Old Myths, Turned on Their Heads: Settler Agency, Federal Authority, and the Colonization of Oregon

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
J. Wilm
{"title":"Old Myths, Turned on Their Heads: Settler Agency, Federal Authority, and the Colonization of Oregon","authors":"J. Wilm","doi":"10.1353/ohq.2022.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The modern historiography of Oregon's settler colonization distances itself radically from the euphemistic accounts that were common into the mid-twentieth century. Some assumptions, however, are rarely challenged. In his article, author Julius Wilm addresses three areas where local agency continues to be overemphasized in modern historiography at the expense of national forces or it is misunderstood in its effects. The article covers the negotiation of the “Oregon Question” in the U.S. Congress during the late 1830s and early 1840s, the passage of the Donation Land Claim Act in 1850, and the extreme violence of settler militias against Indigenous people in the war of 1855–1856. As Wilm argues, “re-introducing the U.S. government as an important agent of Oregon’s colonization…provides crucial context for the colonial push into the Pacific Northwest and the violence it unleashed.”","PeriodicalId":43111,"journal":{"name":"OREGON HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"123 1","pages":"326 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OREGON HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ohq.2022.0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The modern historiography of Oregon's settler colonization distances itself radically from the euphemistic accounts that were common into the mid-twentieth century. Some assumptions, however, are rarely challenged. In his article, author Julius Wilm addresses three areas where local agency continues to be overemphasized in modern historiography at the expense of national forces or it is misunderstood in its effects. The article covers the negotiation of the “Oregon Question” in the U.S. Congress during the late 1830s and early 1840s, the passage of the Donation Land Claim Act in 1850, and the extreme violence of settler militias against Indigenous people in the war of 1855–1856. As Wilm argues, “re-introducing the U.S. government as an important agent of Oregon’s colonization…provides crucial context for the colonial push into the Pacific Northwest and the violence it unleashed.”
古老的神话,颠覆了它们:移民局、联邦当局和俄勒冈州的殖民
摘要:俄勒冈州定居者殖民化的现代史学与20世纪中期常见的委婉说法大相径庭。然而,一些假设很少受到质疑。在他的文章中,作者Julius Wilm谈到了三个领域,在这些领域中,地方机构在现代史学中继续被过度强调,而牺牲了国家力量,或者其影响被误解。这篇文章涵盖了19世纪30年代末和19世纪40年代初美国国会对“俄勒冈州问题”的谈判,1850年《捐赠土地索赔法》的通过,以及1855-1856年战争中定居者民兵对土著人民的极端暴力行为。正如Wilm所说,“重新引入美国政府作为俄勒冈州殖民的重要代理人……为殖民地向太平洋西北部的推进及其引发的暴力提供了至关重要的背景。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Oregon Historical Quarterly, a peer-reviewed, public history journal, has been published continuously since 1900 by the Oregon Historical Society, an independent, nonprofit organization. OHQ brings well-researched, well-written history about Oregon and the Pacific Northwest to both scholars and a general audience. With a circulation of around 5,500, OHQ is one of the largest state historical society journals in the United States and is a recognized and respected source for the history of the Pacific Northwest region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信