The Temporal and Material Dimension of Creative Work: Against “Automatic Society”

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Noonan
{"title":"The Temporal and Material Dimension of Creative Work: Against “Automatic Society”","authors":"J. Noonan","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2021.1935544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main focus of Bernard Stiegler’s critique of automatic society is the threat that automatic systems pose to human creative work in undermining possibility by eliminating the available time that it takes human beings to think and work through problems posed by the relative independence of the material world. When humans work creatively, they do not automatically translate ideas into reality. Instead, the object constantly poses unexpected challenges that must be reflected upon and worked through. Surprisingly, even Marx ignored the temporal dimension of work involving the material world. Through the example of artistic work, this essay illustrates and begins sketching a solution to the threat that automatic society poses to creative work. Against Marx, it shows that artistic work is never a case of simply imprinting an idea on a passive material substratum but is always a struggle through which the idea changes in the process of its realization.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"415 - 431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1935544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main focus of Bernard Stiegler’s critique of automatic society is the threat that automatic systems pose to human creative work in undermining possibility by eliminating the available time that it takes human beings to think and work through problems posed by the relative independence of the material world. When humans work creatively, they do not automatically translate ideas into reality. Instead, the object constantly poses unexpected challenges that must be reflected upon and worked through. Surprisingly, even Marx ignored the temporal dimension of work involving the material world. Through the example of artistic work, this essay illustrates and begins sketching a solution to the threat that automatic society poses to creative work. Against Marx, it shows that artistic work is never a case of simply imprinting an idea on a passive material substratum but is always a struggle through which the idea changes in the process of its realization.
创造性工作的时间和物质维度:反对“自动化社会”
伯纳德·斯蒂格勒(Bernard Stiegler)对自动化社会的批评主要集中在自动化系统对人类创造性工作构成的威胁上,因为自动化系统消除了人类思考和解决物质世界相对独立性所带来的问题的可用时间,从而破坏了可能性。当人类创造性地工作时,他们不会自动将想法转化为现实。相反,该对象不断提出意想不到的挑战,必须反思和解决。令人惊讶的是,即使是马克思也忽略了涉及物质世界的工作的时间维度。通过艺术作品的例子,这篇文章说明并开始概述一个解决方案,自动化社会对创造性工作构成的威胁。与马克思相反,它表明,艺术工作从来不是简单地将一种思想烙印在被动的物质基础上,而始终是一种斗争,通过这种斗争,思想在实现的过程中发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信