Philip Ross Bullock and Daniel M. Grimley (eds.) Music's Nordic Breakthrough: Aesthetics, Modernity, and Cultural Exchange, 1890–1930 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2021), ISBN: 978-1-78327-568-7 (hb).

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Tim Howell
{"title":"Philip Ross Bullock and Daniel M. Grimley (eds.) Music's Nordic Breakthrough: Aesthetics, Modernity, and Cultural Exchange, 1890–1930 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2021), ISBN: 978-1-78327-568-7 (hb).","authors":"Tim Howell","doi":"10.1017/S1478572222000159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A book by the Danish critic and theorist Georg Brandes (1842–1927), known in English as Men of the Modern Breakthrough (1883), is the starting point for this volume. Described here as a ‘provocative survey of recent trends in Scandinavian literature and an impassioned call for its aesthetic renewal’ (1), Brandes was critical of its insular and backwards-looking nature, promoting a model found in the younger literary generation of the time. The current editors note the controversial nature of Brandes’s work, especially ‘its stubborn commitment to a curiously anachronistic “great male”model of authorship’(1), but rightly consider it to be a groundbreaking and significant study. Applying Brandes’s concepts to Music is the main thrust ofMusic’s Nordic Breakthrough, while removing any gender imbalance would be a natural part of any publication today. However, when you look at the chapter titles here and note the highlighted case studies, two issues emerge. The ten figures listed (in order) are: Gustav Vigeland, Einer Jónsson, Sergei Diaghilev, Konstantin Korovin, Wilhelm Peterson-Berger, Jean Sibelius, Hugo von Hofmannsthal, Ture Rangström, Fartein Valen, and Jāzeps Vītols. Their artistic diversity, as painters, sculptors, playwrights, dramatists, poets, and composers, is striking. So too is their gender: they are all male. It seems that a ‘commitment to a curiously anachronistic “great male”model of authorship’ is alive and well, as far as the current editors are concerned. The reader may wonder if there were any female Nordic composers at this time (1890– 1930). You bet there were! A series of articles for Finnish Music Quarterly by Susanna Välimäki and Nuppu Koivisto, derived from their book project titled Sävelten tyttäret: Säveltävät naiset Suomen historiassa 1700-luvun lopulta 1900-luvun alkuun (Daughters of Music: Finnish Women Composers, from the late 18th to the early 20th centuries), discusses the lives and music of historical women composers in Finland. Neglect due to gender bias emerges as a strong theme in this survey and Brandes’s attitude in 1883 was typical of that time; but it is hard to fathom the rationale behind current editorial thinking. Moreover, with Finland being the first European country to grant equal voting rights to women (1906), the artistic ramifications of this political breakthrough should surely merit some discussion in a book such as this. There is something worryingly selective about this","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572222000159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A book by the Danish critic and theorist Georg Brandes (1842–1927), known in English as Men of the Modern Breakthrough (1883), is the starting point for this volume. Described here as a ‘provocative survey of recent trends in Scandinavian literature and an impassioned call for its aesthetic renewal’ (1), Brandes was critical of its insular and backwards-looking nature, promoting a model found in the younger literary generation of the time. The current editors note the controversial nature of Brandes’s work, especially ‘its stubborn commitment to a curiously anachronistic “great male”model of authorship’(1), but rightly consider it to be a groundbreaking and significant study. Applying Brandes’s concepts to Music is the main thrust ofMusic’s Nordic Breakthrough, while removing any gender imbalance would be a natural part of any publication today. However, when you look at the chapter titles here and note the highlighted case studies, two issues emerge. The ten figures listed (in order) are: Gustav Vigeland, Einer Jónsson, Sergei Diaghilev, Konstantin Korovin, Wilhelm Peterson-Berger, Jean Sibelius, Hugo von Hofmannsthal, Ture Rangström, Fartein Valen, and Jāzeps Vītols. Their artistic diversity, as painters, sculptors, playwrights, dramatists, poets, and composers, is striking. So too is their gender: they are all male. It seems that a ‘commitment to a curiously anachronistic “great male”model of authorship’ is alive and well, as far as the current editors are concerned. The reader may wonder if there were any female Nordic composers at this time (1890– 1930). You bet there were! A series of articles for Finnish Music Quarterly by Susanna Välimäki and Nuppu Koivisto, derived from their book project titled Sävelten tyttäret: Säveltävät naiset Suomen historiassa 1700-luvun lopulta 1900-luvun alkuun (Daughters of Music: Finnish Women Composers, from the late 18th to the early 20th centuries), discusses the lives and music of historical women composers in Finland. Neglect due to gender bias emerges as a strong theme in this survey and Brandes’s attitude in 1883 was typical of that time; but it is hard to fathom the rationale behind current editorial thinking. Moreover, with Finland being the first European country to grant equal voting rights to women (1906), the artistic ramifications of this political breakthrough should surely merit some discussion in a book such as this. There is something worryingly selective about this
菲利普·罗斯·布洛克和丹尼尔·格里姆利合编。《北欧音乐的突破:美学、现代性与文化交流》,1890 - 1930(伍德布里奇:Boydell出版社,2021),ISBN: 978-1-78327-568-7 (hb)。
丹麦评论家和理论家乔治·布兰德斯(1842-1927)的一本书,在英语中被称为现代突破的人(1883),是本卷的起点。这本书被描述为“对斯堪的纳维亚文学近期趋势的挑衅调查,以及对其审美更新的热情呼吁”(1),布兰德斯对其狭隘和向后看的本质持批评态度,提倡一种在当时年轻一代文学中发现的模式。当前的编辑们注意到布兰德斯作品的争议性,特别是“它固执地坚持一种奇怪的过时的‘伟大的男性’作者模式”(1),但正确地认为这是一项开创性的、有意义的研究。将Brandes的概念应用于音乐是《音乐的北欧突破》的主旨,而消除任何性别失衡将是当今任何出版物的自然组成部分。但是,当您查看这里的章节标题并注意突出的案例研究时,会出现两个问题。列出的十位人物(按顺序排列)是:古斯塔夫·维格兰、艾纳Jónsson、谢尔盖·迪亚基列夫、康斯坦丁·科罗文、威廉·彼得森-伯杰、让·西贝柳斯、雨果·冯·霍夫曼斯塔尔、Ture Rangström、法泰因·瓦伦和Jāzeps v·托尔斯。他们的艺术多样性,如画家、雕塑家、剧作家、戏剧家、诗人和作曲家,是惊人的。他们的性别也是如此:他们都是男性。就目前的编辑而言,“对一种奇怪的过时的‘伟大男性’作者模式的承诺”似乎还活着,而且很好。读者可能想知道在这个时期(1890 - 1930)是否有北欧女性作曲家。当然有!Susanna Välimäki和Nuppu Koivisto在《芬兰音乐季刊》上发表的一系列文章,源自她们的著作Sävelten tyttäret: Säveltävät naiset Suomen historiassa 1700-luvun lopulta 1900-luvun alkuun(音乐的女儿:18世纪末至20世纪初的芬兰女作曲家),讨论了芬兰历史上女作曲家的生活和音乐。性别偏见导致的忽视在这次调查中成为一个强烈的主题,布兰德斯在1883年的态度是当时的典型;但很难理解当前编辑思维背后的基本原理。此外,芬兰是第一个给予女性平等投票权的欧洲国家(1906年),这一政治突破的艺术影响肯定值得在这样一本书中进行讨论。这其中有一些令人担忧的选择性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信