Agreement between Impression of Stroke in the Emergency Department and Diagnosis at the Neurology Department

S. Shams-Vahdati, A. Ala, E. Sadeghi-Hokmabad, N. Parnianfard, Maedeh Gheybi, Nasim Ahmadi Sepehri
{"title":"Agreement between Impression of Stroke in the Emergency Department and Diagnosis at the Neurology Department","authors":"S. Shams-Vahdati, A. Ala, E. Sadeghi-Hokmabad, N. Parnianfard, Maedeh Gheybi, Nasim Ahmadi Sepehri","doi":"10.7575/aiac.abcmed.v.7n.3p.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Missing to detect an ischemic stroke in the emergency department leads to miss acute interventions and treatment with secondary prevention therapy. Our study examined the diagnosis of stroke in the emergency department (ED) and neurology department of an academic teaching hospital. Methods and Materials: A retrospective chart review was performed from March 2017 to March 2018. ED medical document (chart) were reviewed by a stroke neurologist to collect the clinical diagnosis and characteristics of ischemic stroke patients. For determining the cases of misdiagnosed and over diagnosed data, the administrative data codes were compared with the chart adjudicated diagnosis. The adjusted estimate of effect was estimated through testing the significant variables in a multivariable model. The comparisons were done with chi square test. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. Results: Of 861 patients of the study, 54% were males and 43% were females; and the mean age of them was 66.51 ± 15.70. We find no statically significant difference between patient’s Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the emergency department (12.87±3.25) and patients GCS in the neurology department (11.77±5.15). There were 18 (2.2%) overdiagnosed of ischemic stroke, 8 (0.9%) misdiagnosed of ischemic stroke and 36 (4.1%) misdiagnosed of hemorrhagic strokes in the emergency department. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between impression of stroke in the emergency department and diagnosis at the neurology department.","PeriodicalId":92322,"journal":{"name":"Advances in bioscience and clinical medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in bioscience and clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.abcmed.v.7n.3p.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Missing to detect an ischemic stroke in the emergency department leads to miss acute interventions and treatment with secondary prevention therapy. Our study examined the diagnosis of stroke in the emergency department (ED) and neurology department of an academic teaching hospital. Methods and Materials: A retrospective chart review was performed from March 2017 to March 2018. ED medical document (chart) were reviewed by a stroke neurologist to collect the clinical diagnosis and characteristics of ischemic stroke patients. For determining the cases of misdiagnosed and over diagnosed data, the administrative data codes were compared with the chart adjudicated diagnosis. The adjusted estimate of effect was estimated through testing the significant variables in a multivariable model. The comparisons were done with chi square test. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. Results: Of 861 patients of the study, 54% were males and 43% were females; and the mean age of them was 66.51 ± 15.70. We find no statically significant difference between patient’s Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the emergency department (12.87±3.25) and patients GCS in the neurology department (11.77±5.15). There were 18 (2.2%) overdiagnosed of ischemic stroke, 8 (0.9%) misdiagnosed of ischemic stroke and 36 (4.1%) misdiagnosed of hemorrhagic strokes in the emergency department. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between impression of stroke in the emergency department and diagnosis at the neurology department.
急诊科中风印象与神经内科诊断的一致性
背景:在急诊科未能发现缺血性中风会导致错过急性干预和二级预防治疗。我们的研究检查了一家学术教学医院急诊科(ED)和神经内科对中风的诊断。方法和材料:2017年3月至2018年3月进行了回顾性图表审查。脑卒中神经学家查阅ED医学文件(图表),收集缺血性脑卒中患者的临床诊断和特征。为了确定误诊和过度诊断数据的病例,将行政数据代码与图表裁决的诊断进行比较。通过测试多变量模型中的显著变量来估计调整后的效果估计。比较采用卡方检验。统计学意义为P<0.05。结果:861例患者中,54%为男性,43%为女性;平均年龄66.51±15.70岁。急诊科患者的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)(12.87±3.25)和神经内科患者的GCS(11.77±5.15)之间没有静态显著差异。急诊科有18例(2.2%)过度诊断缺血性卒中,8例(0.9%)误诊为缺血性卒中,36例(4.1%)误诊为出血性卒中。结论:急诊科对脑卒中的印象与神经内科的诊断无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信