Letters to the Coeditors

A. de Graaf
{"title":"Letters to the Coeditors","authors":"A. de Graaf","doi":"10.1080/03621537.2022.2046975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hi Bill, I had been looking forward to the Transactional Analysis Journal on Schiffian reparenting for quite some time and have now read the various contributions to it. I’m impressed. It is valuable, so many years after the Schiff debacle, to look back on that unfortunate period in TA’s development. I think, though I share your shock, it is powerful that you put Schiff in a historical perspective in your article. It is too easy to make her a scapegoat. An ongoing and thorough ethical review of our work is the best we can do. I like what Laurie Weiss (1994) wrote in her ethical evaluation of reparenting from 1994:","PeriodicalId":37049,"journal":{"name":"Transactional Analysis Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"172 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactional Analysis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2022.2046975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hi Bill, I had been looking forward to the Transactional Analysis Journal on Schiffian reparenting for quite some time and have now read the various contributions to it. I’m impressed. It is valuable, so many years after the Schiff debacle, to look back on that unfortunate period in TA’s development. I think, though I share your shock, it is powerful that you put Schiff in a historical perspective in your article. It is too easy to make her a scapegoat. An ongoing and thorough ethical review of our work is the best we can do. I like what Laurie Weiss (1994) wrote in her ethical evaluation of reparenting from 1994:
给共同编辑的信
嗨,比尔,我期待《交易分析杂志》关于希夫安修复已经有一段时间了,现在已经阅读了它的各种贡献。我印象深刻。在希夫破产这么多年后,回顾TA发展的那段不幸时期是很有价值的。我认为,尽管我和你一样感到震惊,但你在文章中从历史的角度看待希夫是很有力量的。让她成为替罪羊太容易了。对我们的工作进行持续和彻底的道德审查是我们能做的最好的事情。我喜欢Laurie Weiss(1994)在她对1994年修复的道德评估中所写的:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactional Analysis Journal
Transactional Analysis Journal Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信