Recalcitrant posterior urethral stenoses: a narrative review of refractory bladder neck contractures and vesicourethral anastomotic stenoses after treatment for localized prostate cancer

Ruth Blum, S. Brandes
{"title":"Recalcitrant posterior urethral stenoses: a narrative review of refractory bladder neck contractures and vesicourethral anastomotic stenoses after treatment for localized prostate cancer","authors":"Ruth Blum, S. Brandes","doi":"10.21037/AMJ-20-191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posterior urethral stenoses, more specifically, bladder neck contracture (BNC) and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS), are a troublesome and dreaded complication after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Patients can develop bothersome and recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and other urinary complications that diminish their quality of life. The diagnosis and management of these patients can be cumbersome and overwhelming to physicians as many require multiple interventions. We reviewed the current literature to better define the incidence of BNC/VUAS after different treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer and to determine the best management strategies. In general, the incidence is higher in radiated patients and takes significantly longer to present, compared to those that are treated with surgery alone. The risk is highest in patients who undergo salvage prostatectomy with an incidence of up to forty percent. A graded approach should be taken to management, as repeated attempts of minimally invasive methods are relatively successful. More aggressive treatment, either endoscopic or surgical, can result in severe de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and require staged placement of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and requires an educated and motivated patient. Robotic assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques are increasing in popularity and show promising results with lower rates of incontinence. Urinary diversion should also be considered in the treatment algorithm for these patients as it is sometimes the best option. However, larger, less heterogeneous studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":72157,"journal":{"name":"AME medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AME medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AMJ-20-191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Posterior urethral stenoses, more specifically, bladder neck contracture (BNC) and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS), are a troublesome and dreaded complication after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Patients can develop bothersome and recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and other urinary complications that diminish their quality of life. The diagnosis and management of these patients can be cumbersome and overwhelming to physicians as many require multiple interventions. We reviewed the current literature to better define the incidence of BNC/VUAS after different treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer and to determine the best management strategies. In general, the incidence is higher in radiated patients and takes significantly longer to present, compared to those that are treated with surgery alone. The risk is highest in patients who undergo salvage prostatectomy with an incidence of up to forty percent. A graded approach should be taken to management, as repeated attempts of minimally invasive methods are relatively successful. More aggressive treatment, either endoscopic or surgical, can result in severe de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and require staged placement of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and requires an educated and motivated patient. Robotic assisted laparoscopic (RAL) techniques are increasing in popularity and show promising results with lower rates of incontinence. Urinary diversion should also be considered in the treatment algorithm for these patients as it is sometimes the best option. However, larger, less heterogeneous studies are needed.
顽固性后尿道狭窄:局限性前列腺癌治疗后顽固性膀胱颈挛缩和膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的叙述回顾
后尿道狭窄,更具体地说,膀胱颈挛缩(BNC)和膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄(VUAS)是局限性前列腺癌治疗后的一个麻烦和可怕的并发症。患者可出现恼人的、反复出现的下尿路症状(LUTS)和其他泌尿系统并发症,从而降低患者的生活质量。这些患者的诊断和管理对医生来说可能是繁琐和压倒性的,因为许多人需要多种干预措施。我们回顾了目前的文献,以更好地定义局限性前列腺癌不同治疗方式后BNC/ vas的发生率,并确定最佳的管理策略。一般来说,与单纯接受手术治疗的患者相比,放射治疗的患者发病率更高,出现的时间也要长得多。在接受补救性前列腺切除术的患者中,风险最高,发生率高达40%。由于微创方法的反复尝试相对成功,因此应采取分级方法进行管理。更积极的治疗,无论是内镜还是手术,都可能导致严重的新生压力性尿失禁(SUI),需要分阶段放置人工尿括约肌(AUS),并且需要一个受过良好教育和积极主动的患者。机器人辅助腹腔镜(RAL)技术越来越受欢迎,并显示出有希望的结果与较低的失禁率。在这些患者的治疗算法中也应该考虑尿分流,因为它有时是最好的选择。然而,需要更大、更少异质性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信