Comparison and validation of numerical methods to assess hydrodynamic loads on mechanical coupling of multiple bodies

IF 1.4 Q3 ENGINEERING, MARINE
Mahdi Ghesmi, A. von Graefe, V. Shigunov, B. Friedhoff, O. el Moctar
{"title":"Comparison and validation of numerical methods to assess hydrodynamic loads on mechanical coupling of multiple bodies","authors":"Mahdi Ghesmi, A. von Graefe, V. Shigunov, B. Friedhoff, O. el Moctar","doi":"10.1080/09377255.2018.1482100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the design of articulated systems, accurate prediction of loads on mechanical couplings is important for the dimensioning of the coupling, as well as an assessment of local and global structural loads. The paper studies a twofold pushing convoy in shallow water. Several numerical approaches for the prediction of articulation loads are compared with each other and with model tests. Kinematic constraints are applied to couple the bodies at articulation points to model hinge and rigid mechanical couplings. For comparison, contact elements are also used to simulate hinges. Depending on the articulation model numerical computations are conducted in frequency or time domain. Comparison between different numerical methods and with model experiments shows that the proposed methods can predict articulation loads with sufficient accuracy for design purposes. The frequency domain approach with kinematic constraints seems more suitable to compute the hinge coupling forces than time-domain simulations with contact elements.","PeriodicalId":51883,"journal":{"name":"Ship Technology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09377255.2018.1482100","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ship Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2018.1482100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the design of articulated systems, accurate prediction of loads on mechanical couplings is important for the dimensioning of the coupling, as well as an assessment of local and global structural loads. The paper studies a twofold pushing convoy in shallow water. Several numerical approaches for the prediction of articulation loads are compared with each other and with model tests. Kinematic constraints are applied to couple the bodies at articulation points to model hinge and rigid mechanical couplings. For comparison, contact elements are also used to simulate hinges. Depending on the articulation model numerical computations are conducted in frequency or time domain. Comparison between different numerical methods and with model experiments shows that the proposed methods can predict articulation loads with sufficient accuracy for design purposes. The frequency domain approach with kinematic constraints seems more suitable to compute the hinge coupling forces than time-domain simulations with contact elements.
多体机械耦合水动力载荷数值评估方法的比较与验证
在铰接系统的设计中,准确预测机械联轴器上的载荷对于联轴器的尺寸以及局部和整体结构载荷的评估非常重要。本文研究了浅水环境下双推式护航。对几种预测关节载荷的数值方法进行了比较,并与模型试验进行了比较。在铰接点处应用运动学约束对主体进行耦合,以模拟铰链和刚性机械联轴器。为了比较,还使用接触单元来模拟铰链。根据铰接模型的不同,分别在频域和时域进行数值计算。不同数值方法与模型试验的对比表明,该方法能较好地预测关节载荷,具有较高的设计精度。考虑运动约束的频域方法比考虑接触单元的时域模拟更适合计算铰链耦合力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ship Technology Research
Ship Technology Research ENGINEERING, MARINE-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信