Confronting the past and changing the future? Public inquiries into institutional child abuse, Ireland and Australia

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
K. Gleeson, Sinéad Ring
{"title":"Confronting the past and changing the future? Public inquiries into institutional child abuse, Ireland and Australia","authors":"K. Gleeson, Sinéad Ring","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2020.1855950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses the framework of transitional justice to examine two prominent examples of national public inquiries into institutional child abuse: the Irish Commission into Child Abuse of 2000–09 and the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse of 2013–2017. It provides a detailed account of the practical workings of each inquiry in the context of the Irish and Australian political and legal environments, with a view to highlighting the particular nation-building function each played in informing a narrative about transitioning from the past to the present. Public inquiries are increasingly used by democratic states as a form of political and legal reckoning for mass crimes committed on children in the care of the state, with inspiration drawn from other examples of the political redress of atrocities (such as war crimes). While transitional justice approaches to peacetime human rights abuses have much to offer in their promise of truth recovery and accountability, they are limited in their ability to achieve justice in the context of consolidated democracies where the ‘transition’ from the past to the present is ambiguous and incomplete. This article points to the benefits of the national public inquiry approach to addressing institutional child abuse, while offering cautions about the expectations of transitional justice in this context, through the landmark examples of Ireland and Australia.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"109 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10383441.2020.1855950","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1855950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article uses the framework of transitional justice to examine two prominent examples of national public inquiries into institutional child abuse: the Irish Commission into Child Abuse of 2000–09 and the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse of 2013–2017. It provides a detailed account of the practical workings of each inquiry in the context of the Irish and Australian political and legal environments, with a view to highlighting the particular nation-building function each played in informing a narrative about transitioning from the past to the present. Public inquiries are increasingly used by democratic states as a form of political and legal reckoning for mass crimes committed on children in the care of the state, with inspiration drawn from other examples of the political redress of atrocities (such as war crimes). While transitional justice approaches to peacetime human rights abuses have much to offer in their promise of truth recovery and accountability, they are limited in their ability to achieve justice in the context of consolidated democracies where the ‘transition’ from the past to the present is ambiguous and incomplete. This article points to the benefits of the national public inquiry approach to addressing institutional child abuse, while offering cautions about the expectations of transitional justice in this context, through the landmark examples of Ireland and Australia.
直面过去,改变未来?爱尔兰和澳大利亚对机构虐待儿童的公开调查
本文利用过渡时期司法的框架来研究国家对机构虐待儿童的公开调查的两个突出例子:2000-2009年的爱尔兰虐待儿童委员会和2013-2017年的澳大利亚皇家机构应对儿童性虐待委员会。它详细介绍了爱尔兰和澳大利亚政治和法律环境中每项调查的实际运作情况,以期突出每项调查在讲述从过去到现在的过渡过程中所发挥的特定国家建设功能。民主国家越来越多地将公开调查作为对国家照顾的儿童犯下的大规模罪行进行政治和法律清算的一种形式,其灵感来自其他政治纠正暴行(如战争罪)的例子。虽然对和平时期侵犯人权行为的过渡司法方法在承诺恢复真相和追究责任方面有很大作用,但在巩固民主的背景下,从过去到现在的“过渡”是模糊和不完整的,它们实现正义的能力有限。本文通过爱尔兰和澳大利亚的里程碑式例子,指出了国家公共调查方法在解决机构虐待儿童问题上的好处,同时对过渡时期司法在这方面的期望提出了警告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信