{"title":"Socio-pragmatic potential of (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy in Internet memes featuring Donald Trump","authors":"A. Martynyuk, O. Meleshchenko","doi":"10.1075/msw.20010.mar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present study explores (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy in Twitter-based Internet memes featuring Donald Trump,\n focusing both on the patterns of conceptual interaction of metaphor and metonymy and their socio-pragmatic potential to influence\n Internet users. The results of the study reveal four types of (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy employed in the analyzed Internet memes.\n The types are differentiated in accordance with the complexity of the metaphoric source: metaphtonymy with a simple metaphoric\n source, metaphtonymy with a metaphoric source structured by simple metonymy, metaphtonymy with a metaphoric source structured by\n metonymic chain, and metaphtonymy with a metaphoric source structured by radial metonymy. In all the four types, the metaphoric\n target is structured by metonymic amalgam – a metonymic complex in which metonymies that are based on different\n ICMs merge due to the association of contiguity that is relevant in the current communicative and social/political context.\n Besides metonymic amalgam, the study introduces the notion of radial metonymy – a metonymic complex that emerges\n when one metonymic source gives access to several metonymic targets. We argue that the analyzed metaphtonymies rest on conceptual\n incongruity created to trigger negative evaluative inferences and emotional responses to shape Trump’s image.","PeriodicalId":51936,"journal":{"name":"Metaphor and the Social World","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metaphor and the Social World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20010.mar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The present study explores (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy in Twitter-based Internet memes featuring Donald Trump,
focusing both on the patterns of conceptual interaction of metaphor and metonymy and their socio-pragmatic potential to influence
Internet users. The results of the study reveal four types of (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy employed in the analyzed Internet memes.
The types are differentiated in accordance with the complexity of the metaphoric source: metaphtonymy with a simple metaphoric
source, metaphtonymy with a metaphoric source structured by simple metonymy, metaphtonymy with a metaphoric source structured by
metonymic chain, and metaphtonymy with a metaphoric source structured by radial metonymy. In all the four types, the metaphoric
target is structured by metonymic amalgam – a metonymic complex in which metonymies that are based on different
ICMs merge due to the association of contiguity that is relevant in the current communicative and social/political context.
Besides metonymic amalgam, the study introduces the notion of radial metonymy – a metonymic complex that emerges
when one metonymic source gives access to several metonymic targets. We argue that the analyzed metaphtonymies rest on conceptual
incongruity created to trigger negative evaluative inferences and emotional responses to shape Trump’s image.
期刊介绍:
The journal Metaphor and the Social World aims to provide a forum for researchers to share with each other, and with potential research users, work that explores aspects of metaphor and the social world. The term “social world” signals the importance given to context (of metaphor use), to connections (e.g. across social, cognitive and discourse dimensions of metaphor use), and to communication (between individuals or across social groups). The journal is not restricted to a single disciplinary or theoretical framework but welcomes papers based in a range of theoretical approaches to metaphor, including discourse and cognitive linguistic approaches, provided that the theory adequately supports the empirical work. Metaphor may be dealt with as either a matter of language or of thought, or of both; what matters is that consideration is given to the social and discourse contexts in which metaphor is found. Furthermore, “metaphor” is broadly interpreted and articles are welcomed on metonymy and other types of figurative language. A further aim is to encourage the development of high-quality research methodology using metaphor as an investigative tool, and for investigating the nature of metaphor use, for example multi-modal discourse analytic or corpus linguistic approaches to metaphor data. The journal publishes various types of articles, including reports of empirical studies, key articles accompanied by short responses, reviews and meta-analyses with commentaries. The Forum section publishes short responses to papers or current issues.