The need for a joint response. Perioperative mortality in Latin America and the time for LASOS Study

Q3 Medicine
J. Calvache, Maria Delgado, L. Stefani, B. Biccard, R. Pearse
{"title":"The need for a joint response. Perioperative mortality in Latin America and the time for LASOS Study","authors":"J. Calvache, Maria Delgado, L. Stefani, B. Biccard, R. Pearse","doi":"10.5554/22562087.e1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We need more than 100 million additional surgical procedures each year in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) to achieve safe, timely and affordable surgery at population level (1, 2). As with any human system, perioperative and medical health care have inherent risks that can vary among populations, including between and within countries, specific settings, and individual providers. Indeed, increasing the volume of surgical activity includes expecting an increase in complications and deaths after surgery, especially in fragile perioperative health systems (3). Perioperative mortality has declined significantly over the past 50 years, with the greatest decline in developed high-income countries, (4) but there has been a paucity of epidemiological research to describe perioperative mortality and complications after surgery, especially in LMICs (5). Latin America includes 33 countries and 14 territories, with a huge diversity in socio-cultural factors, ethnicity, geography, and political systems. These in turn, lead to widespread differences in healthcare provision and the population of patients who require surgery. As an example, Colombia is a predominantly urban country (76% of the population) of over 48 million inhabitants (6) with a widespread variability in the surgical systems across the country. Urban settings show top-quality hospitals and educational programs while rural remote locations have a deficient, fragmented, and disorganized healthcare provision (5). Recent studies have recognized the critical importance of social deprivation and population inequities as risk factors for poor patient outcomes after surgery, (7,8) including timely and affordable access to elective surgical care (9). The availability of objective and robust data allowed clinicians, researchers, and healthcare policymakers to focus on the issues of greatest importance to our patients and contextualize our populations in terms of needs, and availability of surgical services. Nevertheless, in LMICs the large size of the surgical population makes longitudinal epidemiological studies difficult or impossible to be conducted. Routine national datasets are either unavailable or not accessible, and there is little or no research delivery workforce to collect source data. In addition, several barriers to promoting collaborative research have been identified including language barriers, the frailty of health care systems, inappropriate data registries, limitations with approvals from ethical committees and individualism and selfishness in research (10). However, previous collaborative studies during the COVID-19 pandemic were successfully conducted (CovidSurg, CovidSurg-Cancer, CovidSurg Week and CovidSurg 3), including many Latin American countries with a very important number of hospitals, professionals and OPEN","PeriodicalId":36529,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We need more than 100 million additional surgical procedures each year in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) to achieve safe, timely and affordable surgery at population level (1, 2). As with any human system, perioperative and medical health care have inherent risks that can vary among populations, including between and within countries, specific settings, and individual providers. Indeed, increasing the volume of surgical activity includes expecting an increase in complications and deaths after surgery, especially in fragile perioperative health systems (3). Perioperative mortality has declined significantly over the past 50 years, with the greatest decline in developed high-income countries, (4) but there has been a paucity of epidemiological research to describe perioperative mortality and complications after surgery, especially in LMICs (5). Latin America includes 33 countries and 14 territories, with a huge diversity in socio-cultural factors, ethnicity, geography, and political systems. These in turn, lead to widespread differences in healthcare provision and the population of patients who require surgery. As an example, Colombia is a predominantly urban country (76% of the population) of over 48 million inhabitants (6) with a widespread variability in the surgical systems across the country. Urban settings show top-quality hospitals and educational programs while rural remote locations have a deficient, fragmented, and disorganized healthcare provision (5). Recent studies have recognized the critical importance of social deprivation and population inequities as risk factors for poor patient outcomes after surgery, (7,8) including timely and affordable access to elective surgical care (9). The availability of objective and robust data allowed clinicians, researchers, and healthcare policymakers to focus on the issues of greatest importance to our patients and contextualize our populations in terms of needs, and availability of surgical services. Nevertheless, in LMICs the large size of the surgical population makes longitudinal epidemiological studies difficult or impossible to be conducted. Routine national datasets are either unavailable or not accessible, and there is little or no research delivery workforce to collect source data. In addition, several barriers to promoting collaborative research have been identified including language barriers, the frailty of health care systems, inappropriate data registries, limitations with approvals from ethical committees and individualism and selfishness in research (10). However, previous collaborative studies during the COVID-19 pandemic were successfully conducted (CovidSurg, CovidSurg-Cancer, CovidSurg Week and CovidSurg 3), including many Latin American countries with a very important number of hospitals, professionals and OPEN
联合应对的必要性。拉丁美洲围手术期死亡率及LASOS研究时间
我们每年需要在中低收入国家(LMIC)增加1亿多次手术,以在人口水平上实现安全、及时和负担得起的手术(1,2)。与任何人类系统一样,围手术期和医疗保健都有固有的风险,这些风险可能因人群而异,包括国家之间和国家内部、特定环境和个人提供者。事实上,增加手术活动量包括预计手术后并发症和死亡人数会增加,尤其是在脆弱的围手术期健康系统中(3)。在过去50年中,围手术期死亡率显著下降,其中发达高收入国家下降幅度最大,(4)但缺乏流行病学研究来描述围手术期死亡和手术后并发症,尤其是LMIC(5)。拉丁美洲包括33个国家和14个领土,在社会文化因素、种族、地理和政治制度方面具有巨大的多样性。这些反过来又导致了医疗服务和需要手术的患者群体的广泛差异。例如,哥伦比亚是一个以城市为主的国家(占人口的76%),人口超过4800万(6),全国各地的手术系统普遍存在差异。城市环境显示出一流的医院和教育项目,而农村偏远地区的医疗服务不足、分散且无序(5)。最近的研究已经认识到,社会剥夺和人口不平等是导致术后患者预后不佳的风险因素,具有至关重要的意义(7,8),包括及时和负担得起的选择性手术护理(9)。客观可靠数据的可用性使临床医生、研究人员和医疗保健决策者能够专注于对我们的患者最重要的问题,并根据我们的人群的需求和手术服务的可用性来了解他们的情况。然而,在LMIC中,手术人群的庞大规模使得纵向流行病学研究难以或不可能进行。常规的国家数据集要么不可用,要么无法访问,而且几乎没有或根本没有研究人员来收集源数据。此外,还发现了促进合作研究的几个障碍,包括语言障碍、医疗保健系统的脆弱性、不适当的数据登记、伦理委员会批准的限制以及研究中的个人主义和自私(10)。然而,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,先前的合作研究成功进行(CovidSurg、CovidSurg-Cancer、CovidSurg Week和CovidSurg3),包括许多拥有大量医院、专业人员和OPEN的拉丁美洲国家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信