The Impact of the EU’s Economic and Fiscal Policy Measures on the Budgeting Process of Estonia

Q3 Social Sciences
Kati Keel
{"title":"The Impact of the EU’s Economic and Fiscal Policy Measures on the Budgeting Process of Estonia","authors":"Kati Keel","doi":"10.32994/hk.v21i2.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the global financial crisis in 2008-2010, the governance framework of the European Union’s economic and fiscal policy has undergone several changes. The Stability and Growth Pact - the core of the EU’s fiscal governance framework - has been reinforced by the “sixpack”, the “two-pack”, the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union, and the rules are grounded in the European Semester process. After 10 years since the initial major changes were introduced into the EU’s legislative framework and given the current times of fiscal uncertainty as well as ongoing discussions on revising and improving the Stability and Growth Pact rules once again, it is of utmost importance to understand the impacts these past reforms have had on member states in the first place. The paper serves two purposes. First and foremost, the main goal of the paper is to build on the existing knowledge on Europeanization in order to bring into one single framework a whole set of different policy measures and their potential impact on the member state’s budgeting processes. Secondly, the theoretical discussion is followed by an empirical case study of Estonia. The case study not only illustrated and mapped out potential impacts that the EU’s economic and fiscal governance measures can have on a national budgetary process and demonstrated the potential degree of domestic change in response to these various policy measures, but also provided preliminary insights in the possible mediating factors that could additionally influence domestic adaption.","PeriodicalId":39182,"journal":{"name":"Halduskultuur","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Halduskultuur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32994/hk.v21i2.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the global financial crisis in 2008-2010, the governance framework of the European Union’s economic and fiscal policy has undergone several changes. The Stability and Growth Pact - the core of the EU’s fiscal governance framework - has been reinforced by the “sixpack”, the “two-pack”, the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union, and the rules are grounded in the European Semester process. After 10 years since the initial major changes were introduced into the EU’s legislative framework and given the current times of fiscal uncertainty as well as ongoing discussions on revising and improving the Stability and Growth Pact rules once again, it is of utmost importance to understand the impacts these past reforms have had on member states in the first place. The paper serves two purposes. First and foremost, the main goal of the paper is to build on the existing knowledge on Europeanization in order to bring into one single framework a whole set of different policy measures and their potential impact on the member state’s budgeting processes. Secondly, the theoretical discussion is followed by an empirical case study of Estonia. The case study not only illustrated and mapped out potential impacts that the EU’s economic and fiscal governance measures can have on a national budgetary process and demonstrated the potential degree of domestic change in response to these various policy measures, but also provided preliminary insights in the possible mediating factors that could additionally influence domestic adaption.
欧盟经济和财政政策措施对爱沙尼亚预算编制过程的影响
2008-2010年全球金融危机后,欧盟经济和财政政策的治理框架发生了几次变化。《稳定与增长公约》是欧盟财政治理框架的核心,它得到了“六包”、“两包”、《经济和货币联盟稳定、协调和治理条约》的加强,这些规则以欧洲学期进程为基础。自最初的重大改革引入欧盟立法框架10年以来,鉴于当前的财政不确定性,以及正在进行的关于再次修订和改进《稳定与增长公约》规则的讨论,首先了解这些过去的改革对成员国的影响至关重要。这份文件有两个目的。首先,本文的主要目标是在现有的欧洲化知识的基础上,将一整套不同的政策措施及其对成员国预算编制过程的潜在影响纳入一个单一的框架。其次,在理论讨论之后,对爱沙尼亚进行了实证案例研究。该案例研究不仅说明并描绘了欧盟的经济和财政治理措施可能对国家预算过程产生的潜在影响,并展示了应对这些各种政策措施的国内变化的潜在程度,还对可能进一步影响国内适应的可能中介因素提供了初步见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Halduskultuur
Halduskultuur Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信