Smoke and Mirrors: The Chicago Defender, Tobacco Sponsorship, and the Health of the African American Public Sphere

Q4 Social Sciences
Joseph P. Jones, Earnest L. Perry
{"title":"Smoke and Mirrors: The Chicago Defender, Tobacco Sponsorship, and the Health of the African American Public Sphere","authors":"Joseph P. Jones, Earnest L. Perry","doi":"10.1080/00947679.2022.2124764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the relationship between the Chicago Defender and its largest national sponsor, the tobacco industry, from 1947–1975. As a member of the Black press during an age of increasing civil rights activism and intensified media competition, the Defender had difficulty attracting national commercial sponsorship. Tobacco companies were the lone exception and patronage meant more than advertising space. Analyzing editorials, articles, feature columns, advertising, letters to the editor, and internal tobacco industry documents, the authors found a purposeful commercial sponsor given a disproportionate voice. The Defender provided tobacco companies access to a constituting force of the African American 1 social imaginary and an outlet to embed themselves in the African American community and Black identity. Tobacco executives intentionally targeted Black media outlets, and sponsorship extended far beyond the Defender. Placed in historical context and considering an advocacy press’s primary role of serving a community, the authors question the independence allotted by such funding. By studying the best traditions of the Black press—and how it was influenced by its most important commercial sponsor—this study reaffirms journalism’s foundational purpose as a principled and inclusive tool of democratic worldmaking.","PeriodicalId":38759,"journal":{"name":"Journalism history","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.2022.2124764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the relationship between the Chicago Defender and its largest national sponsor, the tobacco industry, from 1947–1975. As a member of the Black press during an age of increasing civil rights activism and intensified media competition, the Defender had difficulty attracting national commercial sponsorship. Tobacco companies were the lone exception and patronage meant more than advertising space. Analyzing editorials, articles, feature columns, advertising, letters to the editor, and internal tobacco industry documents, the authors found a purposeful commercial sponsor given a disproportionate voice. The Defender provided tobacco companies access to a constituting force of the African American 1 social imaginary and an outlet to embed themselves in the African American community and Black identity. Tobacco executives intentionally targeted Black media outlets, and sponsorship extended far beyond the Defender. Placed in historical context and considering an advocacy press’s primary role of serving a community, the authors question the independence allotted by such funding. By studying the best traditions of the Black press—and how it was influenced by its most important commercial sponsor—this study reaffirms journalism’s foundational purpose as a principled and inclusive tool of democratic worldmaking.
烟雾与镜子:芝加哥捍卫者、烟草赞助与非裔美国人公共领域的健康
本文考察了1947年至1975年间《芝加哥后卫报》与其最大的国家赞助商烟草业之间的关系。在民权运动日益激烈和媒体竞争加剧的时代,作为黑人新闻界的一员,《捍卫者》很难吸引到全国性的商业赞助。烟草公司是唯一的例外,赞助不仅仅意味着广告空间。通过分析社论、文章、专题专栏、广告、给编辑的信件和烟草业内部文件,作者们发现,一个有目的的商业赞助商被赋予了不成比例的话语权。《捍卫者》为烟草公司提供了接触非裔美国人社会想象的构成力量的途径,以及将自己融入非裔美国人社区和黑人身份的途径。烟草公司高管有意将目标对准黑人媒体,赞助范围远远超出了《捍卫者》。在历史背景下,考虑到倡导新闻的主要作用是为社区服务,作者质疑这种资助分配的独立性。通过研究黑人新闻界的最佳传统,以及它是如何受到其最重要的商业赞助者的影响,本研究重申了新闻业作为民主世界形成的原则和包容性工具的基本目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journalism history
Journalism history Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信