Do Social Networks have Effects on the Risk Attitude of Commercial Poultry Farmers? Evidence from Southwest Nigeria

Q4 Social Sciences
O. A. Obayelu, Olukemi Olumuyiwa Olowe, Temitope Grace Faleye
{"title":"Do Social Networks have Effects on the Risk Attitude of Commercial Poultry Farmers? Evidence from Southwest Nigeria","authors":"O. A. Obayelu, Olukemi Olumuyiwa Olowe, Temitope Grace Faleye","doi":"10.1515/plua-2017-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Poultry production decision setting is full of risk and imperfect information. Attitude towards risk is a measure of farmers’ willingness to take risks which is an important determinant in their production decisions. Strong social capital emanating from social networks can lead to efficient risk management strategies, thereby minimizing risks faced by the farmers. Therefore, the effects of social capital on the risk attitude of small-scale commercial poultry farmers in Oyo state were assessed. Data were collected from two hundred small-scale farmers and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, factorial analysis, multinomial logit and a two-stage least square. Results showed that 52.5%, 37.5% and 10% of the poultry farmers were risk averse, risk neutral and risk preferring, respectively. About 31.4% and 68.6% of the female and male farmers respectively were risk averse. Close to a fifth, a quarter and two-thirds of the risk averse, risk neutral and risk takers respectively contributed 21-30% of the decisions in the associations. Fourteen percent of the farmers belonged to homogeneous groups. The choice of being risk averse was affected by marital status, educational level, family size, percentage spent on poultry income and aggregate social capital. There was no reverse causality between risk attitude and social capital.","PeriodicalId":30922,"journal":{"name":"Rural Sustainability Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"13 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/plua-2017-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Poultry production decision setting is full of risk and imperfect information. Attitude towards risk is a measure of farmers’ willingness to take risks which is an important determinant in their production decisions. Strong social capital emanating from social networks can lead to efficient risk management strategies, thereby minimizing risks faced by the farmers. Therefore, the effects of social capital on the risk attitude of small-scale commercial poultry farmers in Oyo state were assessed. Data were collected from two hundred small-scale farmers and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, factorial analysis, multinomial logit and a two-stage least square. Results showed that 52.5%, 37.5% and 10% of the poultry farmers were risk averse, risk neutral and risk preferring, respectively. About 31.4% and 68.6% of the female and male farmers respectively were risk averse. Close to a fifth, a quarter and two-thirds of the risk averse, risk neutral and risk takers respectively contributed 21-30% of the decisions in the associations. Fourteen percent of the farmers belonged to homogeneous groups. The choice of being risk averse was affected by marital status, educational level, family size, percentage spent on poultry income and aggregate social capital. There was no reverse causality between risk attitude and social capital.
社交网络对商业家禽养殖户的风险态度有影响吗?来自尼日利亚西南部的证据
摘要家禽生产决策设置充满了风险和不完善的信息。对风险的态度是衡量农民承担风险意愿的一个指标,这是他们生产决策的一个重要决定因素。来自社会网络的强大社会资本可以带来有效的风险管理策略,从而最大限度地减少农民面临的风险。因此,评估了社会资本对奥约州小型商业家禽养殖户风险态度的影响。数据收集自200名小规模农民,并使用描述性和推断统计学、因子分析、多项logit和两阶段最小二乘法进行分析。结果表明,52.5%、37.5%和10%的家禽养殖户厌恶风险、中性风险和偏好风险。女性和男性农民分别有31.4%和68.6%的人厌恶风险。接近五分之一、四分之一和三分之二的风险厌恶者、风险中性者和风险承担者分别贡献了协会21-30%的决策。14%的农民属于同类群体。规避风险的选择受到婚姻状况、教育水平、家庭规模、家禽收入支出百分比和总社会资本的影响。风险态度与社会资本之间不存在反向因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural Sustainability Research
Rural Sustainability Research Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信