Flexibility in wild infant chimpanzee vocal behavior

IF 2.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
G. Dezecache, K. Zuberbühler, Marina Davila-Ross, Christoph D. Dahl
{"title":"Flexibility in wild infant chimpanzee vocal behavior","authors":"G. Dezecache, K. Zuberbühler, Marina Davila-Ross, Christoph D. Dahl","doi":"10.1093/jole/lzaa009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How did human language evolve from earlier forms of communication? One way to address this question is to compare prelinguistic human vocal behavior with nonhuman primate calls. An important finding has been that, prior to speech and from early on, human infant vocal behavior exhibits functional flexibility, or the capacity to produce sounds that are not tied to one specific function. This is reflected in human infants’ use of single categories of protophones (precursors of speech sounds) in various affective circumstances, such that a given call type can occur in and express positive, neutral, or negative affective states, depending on the occasion. Nonhuman primate vocal behavior, in contrast, is seen as comparably inflexible, with different call types tied to specific functions and sometimes to specific affective states (e.g. screams mostly occur in negative circumstances). As a first step toward addressing this claim, we examined the vocal behavior of six wild infant chimpanzees during their first year of life. We found that the most common vocal signal, grunts, occurred in a range of contexts that were deemed positive, neutral, and negative. Using automated feature extraction and supervised learning algorithms, we also found acoustic variants of grunts produced in the affective contexts, suggesting gradation within this vocal category. In contrast, the second most common call type of infant chimpanzees, the whimpers, was produced in only one affective context, in line with standard models of nonhuman primate vocal behavior. Insofar as our affective categorization reflects infants’ true affective state, our results suggest that the most common chimpanzee vocalization, the grunt is not affectively bound. Affective decoupling is a prerequisite for chimpanzee grunts (and other vocal categories) to be deemed ‘functionally flexible’. If later confirmed to be a functionally flexible vocal type, this would indicate that the evolution of this foundational vocal capability occurred before the split between the Homo and Pan lineages.","PeriodicalId":37118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jole/lzaa009","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzaa009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

How did human language evolve from earlier forms of communication? One way to address this question is to compare prelinguistic human vocal behavior with nonhuman primate calls. An important finding has been that, prior to speech and from early on, human infant vocal behavior exhibits functional flexibility, or the capacity to produce sounds that are not tied to one specific function. This is reflected in human infants’ use of single categories of protophones (precursors of speech sounds) in various affective circumstances, such that a given call type can occur in and express positive, neutral, or negative affective states, depending on the occasion. Nonhuman primate vocal behavior, in contrast, is seen as comparably inflexible, with different call types tied to specific functions and sometimes to specific affective states (e.g. screams mostly occur in negative circumstances). As a first step toward addressing this claim, we examined the vocal behavior of six wild infant chimpanzees during their first year of life. We found that the most common vocal signal, grunts, occurred in a range of contexts that were deemed positive, neutral, and negative. Using automated feature extraction and supervised learning algorithms, we also found acoustic variants of grunts produced in the affective contexts, suggesting gradation within this vocal category. In contrast, the second most common call type of infant chimpanzees, the whimpers, was produced in only one affective context, in line with standard models of nonhuman primate vocal behavior. Insofar as our affective categorization reflects infants’ true affective state, our results suggest that the most common chimpanzee vocalization, the grunt is not affectively bound. Affective decoupling is a prerequisite for chimpanzee grunts (and other vocal categories) to be deemed ‘functionally flexible’. If later confirmed to be a functionally flexible vocal type, this would indicate that the evolution of this foundational vocal capability occurred before the split between the Homo and Pan lineages.
野生幼年黑猩猩发声行为的灵活性
人类语言是如何从早期的交流形式演变而来的?解决这个问题的一种方法是将语言前人类的发声行为与非人类灵长类动物的叫声进行比较。一个重要的发现是,在说话之前和从早期开始,人类婴儿的发声行为表现出功能灵活性,或产生与特定功能无关的声音的能力。这反映在人类婴儿在各种情感环境中使用单一类别的原音(语音的前兆),因此特定的呼叫类型可以出现在积极、中性或消极的情感状态中,并根据具体情况表达。相比之下,非人类灵长类动物的发声行为被认为是相对不灵活的,不同的叫声类型与特定的功能有关,有时与特定的情感状态有关(例如,尖叫大多发生在负面环境中)。作为解决这一问题的第一步,我们研究了六只野生幼年黑猩猩在出生第一年的发声行为。我们发现,最常见的声音信号,呼噜声,发生在一系列被认为是积极的、中性的和消极的环境中。使用自动特征提取和监督学习算法,我们还发现了在情感环境中产生的咕哝声的声学变体,这表明在这个声音类别中是分级的。相比之下,幼年黑猩猩第二常见的叫声类型,呜咽,只在一种情感环境中产生,符合非人类灵长类动物发声行为的标准模型。就我们的情感分类反映婴儿的真实情感状态而言,我们的研究结果表明,黑猩猩最常见的发声方式,呼噜声并没有被情感束缚。情感脱钩是黑猩猩咕哝声(和其他发声类别)被视为“功能灵活”的先决条件。如果后来被证实是一种功能灵活的发声类型,这将表明这种基本发声能力的进化发生在人和泛谱系分裂之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language Evolution
Journal of Language Evolution Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信