Evaluation of Side Effects After Heterologous Vaccination with BNT162b2 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Vaccinated with Two Doses of Inactive COVID-19 Vaccine

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
H. Demirbakan, Ipek Kocer, Ihsan Berk, A. Bayram
{"title":"Evaluation of Side Effects After Heterologous Vaccination with BNT162b2 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Vaccinated with Two Doses of Inactive COVID-19 Vaccine","authors":"H. Demirbakan, Ipek Kocer, Ihsan Berk, A. Bayram","doi":"10.36519/kd.2022.4301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Vaccination is the most effective way to control the COVID-19 pandemic all over the world. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between antibody titers and vaccine side effects after the BNT162b2 vaccine was administered as a reminder dose in healthcare workers (HCW) who received two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine name CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China).\n\nMethods: A total of 428 HCWs participated in the study. Participants who received the mRNA vaccine as a reminder dose were evaluated with a questionnaire regarding antibody values and vaccine side effects. Three weeks after the first BNT162b2 vaccine, the same questionnaire was applied face-to-face to HCW, and the same questionnaire was applied to those who received a second reminder dose via telephone.\n\nResults: Out of 428, 373 (87.1%) HCWs preferred one and 55 (12.9%) two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine as reminder doses after being vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine. It was observed that side effects were more frequent in women aged 18-40 after a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine (p<0.001). The most common side effects are redness, swelling, and pain at the injection site, with a rate of 59.6%. Fatigue-weakness was the most common systemic reaction, with a rate of 58.6%. Axillary lymphadenopathy was observed seen in 3 (1.1%) HCWs. The median value of IgG titers in the third week after the reminder dose was found to be higher in HCW with side effects than those without side effects (p<0.001). When the cumulative incidence rate of vaccinated people was evaluated over 389 people, no cases were observed on the 14th and 30th days after the first reminder dose of BNT162b2. However, the first case was observed on the 60th day, and after the second reminder dose, cases were seen on the 14th, 30th, and 60th days.\n\nConclusion: Since the side effects detected after the BNT162b2 reminder dose were mild to moderate and progressed with local symptoms, it was concluded that highly protective mRNA vaccines could be safely preferred for protection from COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2022.4301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Vaccination is the most effective way to control the COVID-19 pandemic all over the world. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between antibody titers and vaccine side effects after the BNT162b2 vaccine was administered as a reminder dose in healthcare workers (HCW) who received two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine name CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China). Methods: A total of 428 HCWs participated in the study. Participants who received the mRNA vaccine as a reminder dose were evaluated with a questionnaire regarding antibody values and vaccine side effects. Three weeks after the first BNT162b2 vaccine, the same questionnaire was applied face-to-face to HCW, and the same questionnaire was applied to those who received a second reminder dose via telephone. Results: Out of 428, 373 (87.1%) HCWs preferred one and 55 (12.9%) two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine as reminder doses after being vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine. It was observed that side effects were more frequent in women aged 18-40 after a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine (p<0.001). The most common side effects are redness, swelling, and pain at the injection site, with a rate of 59.6%. Fatigue-weakness was the most common systemic reaction, with a rate of 58.6%. Axillary lymphadenopathy was observed seen in 3 (1.1%) HCWs. The median value of IgG titers in the third week after the reminder dose was found to be higher in HCW with side effects than those without side effects (p<0.001). When the cumulative incidence rate of vaccinated people was evaluated over 389 people, no cases were observed on the 14th and 30th days after the first reminder dose of BNT162b2. However, the first case was observed on the 60th day, and after the second reminder dose, cases were seen on the 14th, 30th, and 60th days. Conclusion: Since the side effects detected after the BNT162b2 reminder dose were mild to moderate and progressed with local symptoms, it was concluded that highly protective mRNA vaccines could be safely preferred for protection from COVID-19.
卫生工作者接种两剂COVID-19灭活疫苗后异源接种BNT162b2疫苗的副反应评价
目的:疫苗接种是全球控制新冠肺炎疫情的最有效途径。我们旨在评估接种两剂名为CoronaVac(科兴生命科学,中国北京)的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型灭活疫苗的医护人员(HCW)接种BNT162b2疫苗作为提醒剂量后抗体滴度与疫苗副作用之间的关系。方法:共有428名HCW参与了这项研究。接受信使核糖核酸疫苗作为提醒剂量的参与者通过关于抗体值和疫苗副作用的问卷进行评估。在接种第一剂BNT162b2疫苗三周后,对HCW进行了面对面的调查,对通过电话接种第二剂提醒疫苗的人进行了同样的调查。结果:在428名HCW中,373名(87.1%)HCW在接种灭活疫苗后首选一剂和55名(12.9%)两剂BNT162b2疫苗作为提醒剂量。据观察,18-40岁的女性在单剂接种BNT162b2疫苗后,副作用更为常见(p<0.001)。最常见的副作用是注射部位的红肿和疼痛,发生率为59.6%。疲劳无力是最常见的全身反应,发生率达58.6%。在3名(1.1%)HCW中观察到腋窝淋巴结病。发现有副作用的HCW在提醒剂量后第三周的IgG滴度中值高于无副作用的人(p<0.001)。当对389人以上的接种者的累计发病率进行评估时,在第一次提醒剂量BNT162b2后的第14天和第30天没有观察到病例。然而,在第60天观察到第一例病例,在第二次提醒剂量后,在第14、30和60天出现病例。结论:由于BNT162b2提醒剂量后检测到的副作用为轻度至中度,并伴有局部症状,因此得出结论,高保护性mRNA疫苗可以安全地优先用于保护新冠肺炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信