Mai Atef, E. Sheikh, M. Ellithy, K. Naguib, Amr Shafik Tawfik
{"title":"Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer","authors":"Mai Atef, E. Sheikh, M. Ellithy, K. Naguib, Amr Shafik Tawfik","doi":"10.21608/RESONCOL.2019.12516.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer yields equivalent or better outcome in terms of efficacy, toxicity, cosmesis and cost-effectiveness. However, its role in node-positive breast cancer is less clear. \nAim: To compare between adjuvant conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. \nMethods: Prospective pilot study of 66 node-positive breast cancer patients recruited over 1 year in a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant conventional radiotherapy 200 cGy x 25 fractions with 200 cGy x 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (control arm) or hypofractionated radiotherapy 266 cGy x 16 fractions with 266 cGy x 4 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (intervention arm). The end points were disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome, ipsilateral arm lymphedema and acute skin reactions. \nResults: Disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (p = 0.6) and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 87% and 89% in the hypofractionated and conventional arms. The rate of excellent/good cosmetic score was higher in the hypofractionated arm than the conventional as rated by patients (71% vs. 46%, p = 0.182) and physicians (29% vs. 8%, p = 0.32). Hypofractionation, when compared to conventional fractionation, was associated with less arm lymphedema (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.149), dry desquamation (28% vs. 53%, p = 0.04), skin darkness (0% vs. 15%, p = 0.054) and wet desquamation (16% vs. 21%, p = 0.601). \nConclusion: Hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients is equivalent to conventional fractionation as regards disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome and arm lymphedema with less early skin reactions.","PeriodicalId":33915,"journal":{"name":"Research in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/RESONCOL.2019.12516.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer yields equivalent or better outcome in terms of efficacy, toxicity, cosmesis and cost-effectiveness. However, its role in node-positive breast cancer is less clear.
Aim: To compare between adjuvant conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.
Methods: Prospective pilot study of 66 node-positive breast cancer patients recruited over 1 year in a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant conventional radiotherapy 200 cGy x 25 fractions with 200 cGy x 5 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (control arm) or hypofractionated radiotherapy 266 cGy x 16 fractions with 266 cGy x 4 fractions boost to the tumor bed in case of breast conservation (intervention arm). The end points were disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome, ipsilateral arm lymphedema and acute skin reactions.
Results: Disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (p = 0.6) and the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 87% and 89% in the hypofractionated and conventional arms. The rate of excellent/good cosmetic score was higher in the hypofractionated arm than the conventional as rated by patients (71% vs. 46%, p = 0.182) and physicians (29% vs. 8%, p = 0.32). Hypofractionation, when compared to conventional fractionation, was associated with less arm lymphedema (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.149), dry desquamation (28% vs. 53%, p = 0.04), skin darkness (0% vs. 15%, p = 0.054) and wet desquamation (16% vs. 21%, p = 0.601).
Conclusion: Hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients is equivalent to conventional fractionation as regards disease-free survival, cosmetic outcome and arm lymphedema with less early skin reactions.