The relationship between eDNA density distribution and current fields around an artificial reef in the waters of Tateyama Bay, Japan

Nariaki Inoue, Masaaki Sato, N. Furuichi, T. Imaizumi, Masayuki Ushio
{"title":"The relationship between eDNA density distribution and current fields around an artificial reef in the waters of Tateyama Bay, Japan","authors":"Nariaki Inoue, Masaaki Sato, N. Furuichi, T. Imaizumi, Masayuki Ushio","doi":"10.3897/mbmg.6.87415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring of artificial reefs (ARs) has been conducted through such methods as visual censuses, surveys using fishing gear, and echo sounder. These methods have disadvantages: visual census is not possible at ARs in deeper waters, fishing gear surveys are invasive to fish individuals, and echo sounders have difficulty in species identification. A new AR monitoring method is required to compensate for these disadvantages. While eDNA has become a valid monitoring tool for marine biodiversities, it is influenced by degradation and transport of the molecules that affect information about the spatio-temporal distribution of fish. An understanding of the relationship between current fields and eDNA distribution, particularly in open waters, is critical when using eDNA as an index for fish aggregation at ARs. We investigated the relationship between eDNA distribution and current fields around an AR for four dominant species (Engraulis japonicus, Parapristipoma trilineatum, Scomber spp and Trachurus japonicus) in Tateyama Bay, Japan. The highest density of fish schools is formed directly above or at the upstream side of ARs. If we assume that the center of eDNA originates at these locations at an AR and eDNA is simply transported by currents, a higher density of eDNA would distribute downstream from the AR. However, our results indicate that eDNA distribution is in accord with actual fish distribution, namely eDNA densities are more abundant in the upstream side of ARs. We thus consider that eDNA distribution is more influenced by actual distribution patterns than by the transport processes.","PeriodicalId":18374,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.6.87415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Monitoring of artificial reefs (ARs) has been conducted through such methods as visual censuses, surveys using fishing gear, and echo sounder. These methods have disadvantages: visual census is not possible at ARs in deeper waters, fishing gear surveys are invasive to fish individuals, and echo sounders have difficulty in species identification. A new AR monitoring method is required to compensate for these disadvantages. While eDNA has become a valid monitoring tool for marine biodiversities, it is influenced by degradation and transport of the molecules that affect information about the spatio-temporal distribution of fish. An understanding of the relationship between current fields and eDNA distribution, particularly in open waters, is critical when using eDNA as an index for fish aggregation at ARs. We investigated the relationship between eDNA distribution and current fields around an AR for four dominant species (Engraulis japonicus, Parapristipoma trilineatum, Scomber spp and Trachurus japonicus) in Tateyama Bay, Japan. The highest density of fish schools is formed directly above or at the upstream side of ARs. If we assume that the center of eDNA originates at these locations at an AR and eDNA is simply transported by currents, a higher density of eDNA would distribute downstream from the AR. However, our results indicate that eDNA distribution is in accord with actual fish distribution, namely eDNA densities are more abundant in the upstream side of ARs. We thus consider that eDNA distribution is more influenced by actual distribution patterns than by the transport processes.
日本大山湾海域人工礁周围eDNA密度分布与流场的关系
通过目视普查、使用渔具进行调查和回声测深仪等方法对人工珊瑚礁进行了监测。这些方法有缺点:在更深水域的AR中不可能进行视觉普查,渔具调查对鱼类个体具有入侵性,回声测深仪难以识别物种。需要一种新的AR监测方法来弥补这些缺点。虽然eDNA已成为海洋生物多样性的有效监测工具,但它受到影响鱼类时空分布信息的分子降解和运输的影响。当使用eDNA作为AR处鱼类聚集的指数时,了解当前流场与eDNA分布之间的关系,特别是在开放水域中,至关重要。我们研究了日本Tateyama湾四种优势物种(Engraulis japonicus、Parapristipoma trilineatum、Scomber spp和Trachurus japoniccus)的eDNA分布与AR周围流场之间的关系。鱼群密度最高的是在AR的正上方或上游侧形成的。如果我们假设eDNA的中心起源于AR的这些位置,并且eDNA只是通过洋流输送的,那么更高密度的eDNA将分布在AR的下游。然而,我们的结果表明,eDNA的分布与实际的鱼类分布一致,即eDNA密度在AR的上游更丰富。因此,我们认为eDNA分布更多地受到实际分布模式的影响,而不是受到传输过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信