Characteristics and Factors Associated with Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions Caused by Traditional, Complementary and Conventional Medicine in Malaysia

L. Muthupalaniappen
{"title":"Characteristics and Factors Associated with Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions Caused by Traditional, Complementary and Conventional Medicine in Malaysia","authors":"L. Muthupalaniappen","doi":"10.17576/mh.2019.1402.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional and Complimentary Medicines (TCMs) can potentially cause Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions (ACDRs). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of ACDRs due to TCMs and compare with those due to conventional medicine. This was a retrospective study with 134 cases being diagnosed with ACDR at the Dermatology Clinic of a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur. Most (82.1%) ACDRs were caused by conventional drugs, while 17.9% were due to TCMs. Majority (70-75%) of the ACDRs were of mild to moderate severity. The most common ACDR to TCM was Exfoliative Dermatitis (ED) and Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) (both 16.7%) while maculopapular rash was the most common reaction for conventional medications (25.5%). The onset of adverse reaction to TCM was about 4 weeks (60.2%) while reactions due to conventional medication was earlier (1 to 6 days, 65.4%; p<0.05). The odds of developing delayed ACDR was 14 times more with TCM compared to conventional medicine (p<0.05). This study showed that ED and AGEP were the most common ACDR manifestations of TCM while macuplopapular rash was the most common manifestation of conventional medications. However, most of these reactions were of mild to moderate severity. ACDR due to TCM may manifest long after the initiation of these products and hence its use should be routinely inquired when patients present with skin problems. All suspected cases of ADRs to TCM should be reported to the Malaysian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (MADRAC) for continuous pharmacovigilance of these products.","PeriodicalId":80079,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/mh.2019.1402.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional and Complimentary Medicines (TCMs) can potentially cause Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions (ACDRs). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of ACDRs due to TCMs and compare with those due to conventional medicine. This was a retrospective study with 134 cases being diagnosed with ACDR at the Dermatology Clinic of a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur. Most (82.1%) ACDRs were caused by conventional drugs, while 17.9% were due to TCMs. Majority (70-75%) of the ACDRs were of mild to moderate severity. The most common ACDR to TCM was Exfoliative Dermatitis (ED) and Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) (both 16.7%) while maculopapular rash was the most common reaction for conventional medications (25.5%). The onset of adverse reaction to TCM was about 4 weeks (60.2%) while reactions due to conventional medication was earlier (1 to 6 days, 65.4%; p<0.05). The odds of developing delayed ACDR was 14 times more with TCM compared to conventional medicine (p<0.05). This study showed that ED and AGEP were the most common ACDR manifestations of TCM while macuplopapular rash was the most common manifestation of conventional medications. However, most of these reactions were of mild to moderate severity. ACDR due to TCM may manifest long after the initiation of these products and hence its use should be routinely inquired when patients present with skin problems. All suspected cases of ADRs to TCM should be reported to the Malaysian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (MADRAC) for continuous pharmacovigilance of these products.
马来西亚传统、补充和常规医学引起的皮肤药物不良反应的特点和相关因素
传统和补充药物(tcm)可能会导致皮肤药物不良反应(ACDRs)。本研究的目的是描述中药引起的acdr的特点,并与常规药物引起的acdr进行比较。这是一项回顾性研究,在吉隆坡一家三级医院皮肤科诊所诊断为ACDR的134例患者。以常规药物为主(82.1%),中药为主(17.9%)。大多数(70-75%)的acdr为轻至中度严重程度。中药最常见的ACDR是剥脱性皮炎(ED)和急性全发性脓疱病(AGEP)(均为16.7%),而传统药物最常见的反应是丘疹(25.5%)。中药不良反应发生时间约为4周(60.2%),而常规药物不良反应发生时间较早(1 ~ 6 d, 65.4%);p < 0.05)。中药发生迟发性ACDR的几率是常规药物的14倍(p<0.05)。本研究显示,ED和AGEP是中医最常见的ACDR表现,而黄斑部皮疹是常规药物最常见的ACDR表现。然而,这些反应大多是轻度到中度的严重程度。由于中药引起的ACDR可能在这些产品开始使用很长时间后才出现,因此当患者出现皮肤问题时,应常规询问其使用情况。所有疑似中药不良反应病例应报告给马来西亚药物不良反应咨询委员会(MADRAC),以便对这些产品进行持续的药物警戒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信