FIT FÜR DIE WISSENSCHAFT? NEUE FORMEN DES REPUTATIONSGEWINNS

Q2 Medicine
Synergy Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.24818/syn/2022/18/1.12
Doris Sava
{"title":"FIT FÜR DIE WISSENSCHAFT?\nNEUE FORMEN DES REPUTATIONSGEWINNS","authors":"Doris Sava","doi":"10.24818/syn/2022/18/1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competitive financing of research and the increased competition caused research\npractice to focus on citation indices and the scientific community on rankings, the demand\nfor an improved response from research and for more visibility are developments that have\noften been criticized by the public. The change in the scientific landscape and the culture of\nquantification due to the competition for funds, grants and positions, the establishment of\nreputation through long lists of publications and third-party funding, decisive criteria for\nprofessions and recruitment, reveal grievances in the scientific community. The article\ntherefore shows the consequences of these developments and names some challenges that the\nhumanities, and in particular the philological disciplines, encounter in meeting scientific\nstandards.","PeriodicalId":38079,"journal":{"name":"Synergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/syn/2022/18/1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The competitive financing of research and the increased competition caused research practice to focus on citation indices and the scientific community on rankings, the demand for an improved response from research and for more visibility are developments that have often been criticized by the public. The change in the scientific landscape and the culture of quantification due to the competition for funds, grants and positions, the establishment of reputation through long lists of publications and third-party funding, decisive criteria for professions and recruitment, reveal grievances in the scientific community. The article therefore shows the consequences of these developments and names some challenges that the humanities, and in particular the philological disciplines, encounter in meeting scientific standards.
准备好了吗?新形式的信誉
研究经费的竞争和日益激烈的竞争导致研究实践将重点放在引文索引上,科学界关注排名,对研究改进反应的需求和对更大知名度的需求是经常受到公众批评的发展。由于对资金、拨款和职位的竞争,通过一长串的出版物和第三方资助建立声誉,决定性的职业和招聘标准,科学景观和量化文化的变化揭示了科学界的不满。因此,本文展示了这些发展的后果,并指出了人文学科,特别是语言学学科在达到科学标准方面遇到的一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Synergy
Synergy Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信