Online learning and work during the pandemic: update on the legal sector

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Devyani Prabhat
{"title":"Online learning and work during the pandemic: update on the legal sector","authors":"Devyani Prabhat","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2022.2040935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on recent literature and a series of conversations with law firm associates, members of barristers chambers, in-house counsel, and law school staff, on how the pandemic has changed their roles or affected their work conditions, this Policy and Education Developments comment piece provides an update on the state of the legal sector during the pandemic focusing on online learning and work during Covid. The primary impression is of both loss because of loosening of the traditional connections that bind the sectors as well as gain through the use of innovative approaches and thinking on core values and practices. Online teaching and learning have undoubtedly become an integral part of the law student experience because of the pandemic and the associated incorporation of remote learning in the law school curriculum. Whether or not this has been warmly embraced, or simply seen as a means to stay afloat, it has facilitated ongoing critical functions while also not curing some loss of personal contact and inability to participate in the usual in-person manner. Face-to-face in-person interactions are more fluid and spontaneous as there are easy interpersonal cues for discussions while online this is more orchestrated and managed through the system of hand raising icons or (sometimes distracting) chats. Thus, peer-to-peer learning as well as group work is easier when everyone is present in the room. Yet law educators have found ways to innovate to replicate some of the responsive and inclusive mechanisms while teaching online, in some instances, going beyond what is possible in in-person scenarios. The innovations are not technologically complex but are generally effective uses of simple tools such as quizzes, polls, and comments boards. An example is that of Professor Imogen Moore (finalist for Teaching Law with Technology prize 2020), who used Padlet as a tool to enhance small group work. She found it an effective way to gather immediate anonymous questions. Students, on their part, found it less stressful to submit queries and it increased their engagement and responsiveness to what was being taught. Students informed her that they found it","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"56 1","pages":"290 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2022.2040935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Drawing on recent literature and a series of conversations with law firm associates, members of barristers chambers, in-house counsel, and law school staff, on how the pandemic has changed their roles or affected their work conditions, this Policy and Education Developments comment piece provides an update on the state of the legal sector during the pandemic focusing on online learning and work during Covid. The primary impression is of both loss because of loosening of the traditional connections that bind the sectors as well as gain through the use of innovative approaches and thinking on core values and practices. Online teaching and learning have undoubtedly become an integral part of the law student experience because of the pandemic and the associated incorporation of remote learning in the law school curriculum. Whether or not this has been warmly embraced, or simply seen as a means to stay afloat, it has facilitated ongoing critical functions while also not curing some loss of personal contact and inability to participate in the usual in-person manner. Face-to-face in-person interactions are more fluid and spontaneous as there are easy interpersonal cues for discussions while online this is more orchestrated and managed through the system of hand raising icons or (sometimes distracting) chats. Thus, peer-to-peer learning as well as group work is easier when everyone is present in the room. Yet law educators have found ways to innovate to replicate some of the responsive and inclusive mechanisms while teaching online, in some instances, going beyond what is possible in in-person scenarios. The innovations are not technologically complex but are generally effective uses of simple tools such as quizzes, polls, and comments boards. An example is that of Professor Imogen Moore (finalist for Teaching Law with Technology prize 2020), who used Padlet as a tool to enhance small group work. She found it an effective way to gather immediate anonymous questions. Students, on their part, found it less stressful to submit queries and it increased their engagement and responsiveness to what was being taught. Students informed her that they found it
大流行期间的在线学习和工作:法律部门最新情况
根据最近的文献,以及与律师事务所同事、大律师协会成员、内部律师和法学院工作人员就疫情如何改变他们的角色或影响他们的工作条件进行的一系列对话,这篇《政策与教育发展》评论文章提供了疫情期间法律部门状况的最新情况,重点关注疫情期间的在线学习和工作。给人的第一印象是,既因束缚各部门的传统联系的松动而有所损失,又因采用创新方法和对核心价值和实践的思考而有所收获。由于新冠肺炎疫情以及与之相关的将远程学习纳入法学院课程,在线教学无疑已成为法学院学生体验的一个组成部分。不管这是否受到热烈欢迎,或者仅仅被视为一种维持生存的手段,它促进了正在进行的关键职能,同时也没有解决一些个人联系的丧失和无法以通常的面对面方式参与的问题。面对面的互动更加流畅和自发,因为有简单的人际交流线索来进行讨论,而在线则通过举手图标或(有时分散注意力的)聊天系统进行更精心的安排和管理。因此,当每个人都在场时,点对点学习和小组工作更容易。然而,法律教育工作者已经找到了创新的方法,在在线教学中复制一些响应性和包容性的机制,在某些情况下,超越了面对面教学的可能性。这些创新在技术上并不复杂,但通常是对测验、投票和评论板等简单工具的有效使用。Imogen Moore教授(2020年技术法教学奖的决赛选手)就是一个例子,他使用Padlet作为增强小组工作的工具。她发现这是立即收集匿名问题的有效方法。就学生而言,他们发现提交问题的压力更小,而且这提高了他们对所学内容的参与度和反应能力。学生们告诉她他们找到了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信