Pain estimation after coronary angiography based on vital signs by using artificial neural networks

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mohammad Amin Younesieh Heravi, A. Gazerani, M. Yaghubi, Zakiehe A. Amini, P. Salimi, Zahra Z. Falahi
{"title":"Pain estimation after coronary angiography based on vital signs by using artificial neural networks","authors":"Mohammad Amin Younesieh Heravi, A. Gazerani, M. Yaghubi, Zakiehe A. Amini, P. Salimi, Zahra Z. Falahi","doi":"10.35975/APIC.V25I1.1433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronary angiography is gold standard method to diagnose coronary arteries diseases. The aim of this study was to estimate pain after coronary angiography based on vital signs for determining best position by using artificial neural networks ANN. \nMethodology: This study used a database containing 86 subjects that refer to angiography center. For each subject Vital signs were measured that included blood pressure, percent of blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature. The Numeric Rating scale (NRS) was used to determine pain intensity. The vital signs were the inputs and the pain value was the corresponding output. These data were applied to train the ANN in the learning process. The model was implemented in MATLAB software. The results of pain estimation were compared with the results of NRS method and the error rate was calculated. \nResults: The absolute error and error percentage between NRS method and the present method were 5.41 ± 2.63 mmHg, 4.09 ± 1.59%. The results indicated that the pain measurement by NRS method and pain value predicted with trained ANN differ by only less than 11%. It is obvious that the neural network prediction fit properly to the NRS results. \nConclusion: The results of proposed method were closely in agreement with the results of the NRS. so this method can be suggested for reliving the pain and determining the best patient's position after the angiography procedure. \nKey words: Artificial neural network; Coronary angiography; Pain \nCitation: Heravi MAY, Yaghubi MS, Amini ZA, Salimi PS, Falahi ZZ, Gazerani AG. Pain estimation after coronary angiography based on vital signs by using artificial neural networks. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(1):27–32. \nDOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i1.1433 \nReceived: 21 November 2020, Reviewed: 2 December 2020, Accepted: 12 December 2020","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/APIC.V25I1.1433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary angiography is gold standard method to diagnose coronary arteries diseases. The aim of this study was to estimate pain after coronary angiography based on vital signs for determining best position by using artificial neural networks ANN. Methodology: This study used a database containing 86 subjects that refer to angiography center. For each subject Vital signs were measured that included blood pressure, percent of blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature. The Numeric Rating scale (NRS) was used to determine pain intensity. The vital signs were the inputs and the pain value was the corresponding output. These data were applied to train the ANN in the learning process. The model was implemented in MATLAB software. The results of pain estimation were compared with the results of NRS method and the error rate was calculated. Results: The absolute error and error percentage between NRS method and the present method were 5.41 ± 2.63 mmHg, 4.09 ± 1.59%. The results indicated that the pain measurement by NRS method and pain value predicted with trained ANN differ by only less than 11%. It is obvious that the neural network prediction fit properly to the NRS results. Conclusion: The results of proposed method were closely in agreement with the results of the NRS. so this method can be suggested for reliving the pain and determining the best patient's position after the angiography procedure. Key words: Artificial neural network; Coronary angiography; Pain Citation: Heravi MAY, Yaghubi MS, Amini ZA, Salimi PS, Falahi ZZ, Gazerani AG. Pain estimation after coronary angiography based on vital signs by using artificial neural networks. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(1):27–32. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i1.1433 Received: 21 November 2020, Reviewed: 2 December 2020, Accepted: 12 December 2020
基于生命体征的人工神经网络冠状动脉造影术后疼痛评估
背景:冠状动脉造影是诊断冠状动脉疾病的金标准方法。本研究的目的是根据生命体征估计冠状动脉造影后的疼痛,以使用人工神经网络确定最佳位置。方法:本研究使用了一个包含86名受试者的数据库,这些受试者都是血管造影中心的受试者。测量每个受试者的生命体征,包括血压、血氧饱和度百分比、心率、呼吸频率和体温。数值评定量表(NRS)用于确定疼痛强度。生命体征是输入,疼痛值是相应的输出。这些数据被用于在学习过程中训练神经网络。该模型在MATLAB软件中实现。将疼痛估计的结果与NRS方法的结果进行比较,并计算误差率。结果:NRS方法与现有方法的绝对误差和误差百分比分别为5.41±2.63mmHg和4.09±1.59%。结果表明,NRS方法的疼痛测量与训练后的神经网络预测的疼痛值相差不到11%。很明显,神经网络预测与NRS结果拟合良好。结论:所提出的方法的结果与NRS的结果非常一致。因此该方法可用于缓解疼痛和确定血管造影术后患者的最佳位置。关键词:人工神经网络;冠状动脉造影;疼痛引文:Heravi MAY,Yaghubi MS,Amini ZA,Salimi PS,Falahi ZZ,Gazerani AG。使用人工神经网络基于生命体征的冠状动脉造影后疼痛估计。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;25(1):27–32.DOI:10.35975/apic.v25i.1433接收日期:2020年11月21日,审核日期:2020月2日,接受日期:2020 12月12日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信