Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy

S. Shrestha, Mamen Prasad Gorhaly, M. Bajracharya
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy","authors":"S. Shrestha, Mamen Prasad Gorhaly, M. Bajracharya","doi":"10.3126/JAIM.V10I1.37086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available. Sujan Shrestha1, Manen Prasad Gorkhaly1, Manil Ratna Bajracharya2","PeriodicalId":75443,"journal":{"name":"Advances in internal medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JAIM.V10I1.37086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available. Sujan Shrestha1, Manen Prasad Gorkhaly1, Manil Ratna Bajracharya2
单丝试验检测糖尿病神经病变的诊断准确性
背景糖尿病周围神经病变(Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, DPN)是糖尿病足的重要独立危险因素,需要一种有效的筛查手段来早期诊断DPN,以防止今后发生溃疡和截肢。本研究旨在探讨单丝试验对糖尿病周围神经病变的诊断准确性。方法本横断面研究于2016年2月至2017年1月在加德满都Mahabouddha的国家医学科学院Bir医院进行。选取住院和门诊共96例糖尿病患者。采用单丝法测量保护感觉丧失(LOPS)评估糖尿病周围神经病变,并采用标准生物传感器与振动感知阈值进行比较。计算单丝试验的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果糖尿病周围神经病变发生率为26%。单丝试验的敏感性为92.0%,特异性为95.8%,阳性预测值为88.5%,阴性预测值为97.1%。单丝测得的LOPS与生物等高线测得的振动感知阈值有较强的相关性。结论单丝试验对DPN的诊断准确性较生物等距仪高。由于单丝检测是一种便宜、容易获得和便携的方法,它可以用于没有生物等高线仪的外围地区。Sujan Shrestha1, Manen Prasad Gorkhaly1, Manil Ratna Bajracharya2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信