Drivers of rural households’ food insecurity in Ethiopia: a comprehensive approach of calorie intake and food consumption score

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Million Sileshi, S. Sieber, Teshome Lejissa, D. Ndyetabula
{"title":"Drivers of rural households’ food insecurity in Ethiopia: a comprehensive approach of calorie intake and food consumption score","authors":"Million Sileshi, S. Sieber, Teshome Lejissa, D. Ndyetabula","doi":"10.1080/03031853.2023.2180041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Most food insecurity studies in developing countries, including Ethiopia, use a single food security indicator to determine the food insecurity status, thus overlooking the multidimensional nature of food security. Using cross-sectional data collected from 408 households in three districts of East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia, this study combined two food security indicators namely calorie intake and Food Consumption Score (FCS) so as to gain more insights on the multidimensional nature of food security and to categorise households into different food insecurity groups. The study further sought to identify factors influencing the households’ food insecurity status. The research findings based respectively on the per capita calorie intake and the FCS indicate that 36.03 and 49.02 percent of the sampled households were food insecure. However, the findings reveal that when the two indicators were combined, 22.06 and 40.93 percent of the households were completely food insecure and transitory food insecure respectively. These findings also suggest that the 40.93 percent (26.96 and 13.97 percent) of households categorised as food secure based on single indicators (i.e., per capita calorie intake and FCS respectively) was unrealistic. Furthermore, findings from the bivariate probit model indicate that food insecurity incidences decreased with the adoption of soil and water conservation, access to irrigation, livestock, access to fertilisers, and household income. It increased with the age of the household head, the household size, and the coping strategy index. Therefore, policies and strategies combating food insecurity should consider a combination of food security indicators.","PeriodicalId":55541,"journal":{"name":"Agrekon","volume":"62 1","pages":"152 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrekon","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2023.2180041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most food insecurity studies in developing countries, including Ethiopia, use a single food security indicator to determine the food insecurity status, thus overlooking the multidimensional nature of food security. Using cross-sectional data collected from 408 households in three districts of East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia, this study combined two food security indicators namely calorie intake and Food Consumption Score (FCS) so as to gain more insights on the multidimensional nature of food security and to categorise households into different food insecurity groups. The study further sought to identify factors influencing the households’ food insecurity status. The research findings based respectively on the per capita calorie intake and the FCS indicate that 36.03 and 49.02 percent of the sampled households were food insecure. However, the findings reveal that when the two indicators were combined, 22.06 and 40.93 percent of the households were completely food insecure and transitory food insecure respectively. These findings also suggest that the 40.93 percent (26.96 and 13.97 percent) of households categorised as food secure based on single indicators (i.e., per capita calorie intake and FCS respectively) was unrealistic. Furthermore, findings from the bivariate probit model indicate that food insecurity incidences decreased with the adoption of soil and water conservation, access to irrigation, livestock, access to fertilisers, and household income. It increased with the age of the household head, the household size, and the coping strategy index. Therefore, policies and strategies combating food insecurity should consider a combination of food security indicators.
埃塞俄比亚农村家庭粮食不安全的驱动因素:热量摄入和粮食消费得分的综合方法
摘要包括埃塞俄比亚在内的发展中国家的大多数粮食不安全研究都使用单一的粮食安全指标来确定粮食不安全状况,从而忽视了粮食安全的多层面性质。本研究利用从埃塞俄比亚东哈拉尔吉地区三个区的408户家庭收集的横断面数据,结合了两个粮食安全指标,即卡路里摄入量和粮食消费得分,以深入了解粮食安全的多维性质,并将家庭分为不同的粮食不安全群体。该研究进一步试图确定影响家庭粮食不安全状况的因素。分别基于人均卡路里摄入量和FCS的研究结果表明,36.03%和49.02%的抽样家庭粮食不安全。然而,调查结果显示,当这两个指标结合在一起时,22.06%和40.93%的家庭分别处于完全粮食不安全和暂时粮食不安全状态。这些发现还表明,根据单一指标(即人均卡路里摄入量和FCS)将40.93%(26.96%和13.97%)的家庭归类为粮食安全家庭是不现实的。此外,双变量probit模型的研究结果表明,随着水土保持、灌溉、牲畜、化肥和家庭收入的采用,粮食不安全发生率下降。它随着户主年龄、家庭规模和应对策略指数的增加而增加。因此,应对粮食不安全的政策和战略应考虑将粮食安全指标结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrekon
Agrekon AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Agrekon publishes scholarly articles that contribute to the existing literature in the domain of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics as it applies to Southern Africa. The editors of Agrekon therefore invite contributions in this context that provide new insights, either through the problems they address, the methods they employ or the theoretical and practical insights gained from the results. The quarterly journal serves as the official publication of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA) and is published by Taylor & Francis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信