Rhetorical Moves in Research Article Introductions of Students of Linguistics Master Program

Jevi Mahardika, S. E. Tabiati, Hamamah Hamamah
{"title":"Rhetorical Moves in Research Article Introductions of Students of Linguistics Master Program","authors":"Jevi Mahardika, S. E. Tabiati, Hamamah Hamamah","doi":"10.24843/e-jl.2020.v14.i01.p14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigated the rhetorical moves in the introduction part to the research article written by graduate students in Linguistics master's study programs. The primary purpose of this research is to describe the pattern of rhetorical moves in the research article introductions in the field of Linguistics. The data collection technique was in the form of scientific article documentation consisting of seven research article introductions in English in the field of Linguistics. Researchers collected data in the form of text with document analysis and note-taking techniques. These research articles were taken from four different journal publishers in Indonesia, namely Alphabet, Kelasa, Batra, and Suar Betang. The rhetorical analysis in this study involves the concept of the Project Justifying Model (PJM) proposed by Safnil (2010), which consists of four communicative moves that can describe the rhetorical moves of Indonesian writers. The validity of the data in this rhetorical pattern study used the triangulation of sources or data. The results of this study indicate that the seven introductions have different rhetorical moves. The four research article introductions taken from the Alphabet produced fewer rhetorical steps compared to the other three research articles. The most dominant signal found in the seven research article introductions is (move 4, step A) represents a statement in explaining the purpose of the study. The seven research article introductions found no statements that represented the five steps contained in each move.","PeriodicalId":53334,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2020.v14.i01.p14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigated the rhetorical moves in the introduction part to the research article written by graduate students in Linguistics master's study programs. The primary purpose of this research is to describe the pattern of rhetorical moves in the research article introductions in the field of Linguistics. The data collection technique was in the form of scientific article documentation consisting of seven research article introductions in English in the field of Linguistics. Researchers collected data in the form of text with document analysis and note-taking techniques. These research articles were taken from four different journal publishers in Indonesia, namely Alphabet, Kelasa, Batra, and Suar Betang. The rhetorical analysis in this study involves the concept of the Project Justifying Model (PJM) proposed by Safnil (2010), which consists of four communicative moves that can describe the rhetorical moves of Indonesian writers. The validity of the data in this rhetorical pattern study used the triangulation of sources or data. The results of this study indicate that the seven introductions have different rhetorical moves. The four research article introductions taken from the Alphabet produced fewer rhetorical steps compared to the other three research articles. The most dominant signal found in the seven research article introductions is (move 4, step A) represents a statement in explaining the purpose of the study. The seven research article introductions found no statements that represented the five steps contained in each move.
研究中的修辞动作语言学硕士研究生论文简介
本研究调查了语言学硕士研究生论文引言部分的修辞手法。本研究的主要目的是描述语言学领域研究文章引言中的修辞动作模式。数据收集技术采用科学文章文档的形式,由语言学领域的七篇英文研究文章介绍组成。研究人员通过文件分析和笔记技术以文本的形式收集数据。这些研究文章来自印度尼西亚四家不同的期刊出版商,即Alphabet、Kelasa、Batra和Suar Betang。本研究中的修辞分析涉及萨夫尼尔(2010)提出的项目论证模型(PJM)的概念,该模型由四个可以描述印尼作家修辞动作的交际动作组成。在这项修辞模式研究中,数据的有效性使用了来源或数据的三角测量。研究结果表明,这七个引子具有不同的修辞手法。与其他三篇研究文章相比,取自字母表的四篇研究文章介绍的修辞步骤更少。在七篇研究文章的引言中发现的最主要的信号是(第4步,步骤A)代表了解释研究目的的陈述。七篇研究文章的介绍没有发现任何陈述可以代表每一步中包含的五个步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信