Place of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Q3 Health Professions
Mahdi Al-Jeabory, L. Szarpak, Z. Rafique, N. Vasan, Kecskés Attila, A. Gąsecka, W. Gaweł, M. Pruc, M. Malysz, M. Jaguszewski, I. Savytskyi, Natasza Blek, K. Filipiak, F. Peacock
{"title":"Place of tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Mahdi Al-Jeabory, L. Szarpak, Z. Rafique, N. Vasan, Kecskés Attila, A. Gąsecka, W. Gaweł, M. Pruc, M. Malysz, M. Jaguszewski, I. Savytskyi, Natasza Blek, K. Filipiak, F. Peacock","doi":"10.5603/DEMJ.A2021.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. In many cases of TBI-related intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with a high risk of coagulopathy and may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhage growth. Therefore, tranexamic acid (TXA), which is known as an antifibrinolytic agent that reduces bleeding by inhibiting the breakdown of blood clots, might limit ICH expansion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We aimed to quantify the effects of TXA in brain injury and thus performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for studies that were published between the respective database inception, and April 10, 2021. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were identified; these included 5845 patients treated with, and 5380 treated without TXA. The 28-day or in-hospital mortality was 17.8% for the TXA group, compared with 19.3% for the no-TXA group (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.01; p = 0.08). At 6-months follow-up, mortality was 18.3% vs 19.9% (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.63–1.31; p = 0.60), with and without TXA, respectively. A Glasgow Outcome Scale less than 4 points at 28-days follow-up was reported in 3 studies and was 29.8% vs 34.8% (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.82; p = 0.78), with and without TXA, respectively. No differences were found in adverse events between TXA and non-TXA groups. CONCLUSION: Our analysis found showed no statistical significance between TXA and non-TXA treatment of TBI patients, however, in the TXA group a trend to decrease 28-day mortality compared to non-TXA treatment was observed. More high-quality studies are needed to show the significant benefit of using TXA, especially in moderate and severe TBI patient groups.","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/DEMJ.A2021.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. In many cases of TBI-related intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with a high risk of coagulopathy and may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhage growth. Therefore, tranexamic acid (TXA), which is known as an antifibrinolytic agent that reduces bleeding by inhibiting the breakdown of blood clots, might limit ICH expansion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We aimed to quantify the effects of TXA in brain injury and thus performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for studies that were published between the respective database inception, and April 10, 2021. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were identified; these included 5845 patients treated with, and 5380 treated without TXA. The 28-day or in-hospital mortality was 17.8% for the TXA group, compared with 19.3% for the no-TXA group (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.01; p = 0.08). At 6-months follow-up, mortality was 18.3% vs 19.9% (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.63–1.31; p = 0.60), with and without TXA, respectively. A Glasgow Outcome Scale less than 4 points at 28-days follow-up was reported in 3 studies and was 29.8% vs 34.8% (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.82; p = 0.78), with and without TXA, respectively. No differences were found in adverse events between TXA and non-TXA groups. CONCLUSION: Our analysis found showed no statistical significance between TXA and non-TXA treatment of TBI patients, however, in the TXA group a trend to decrease 28-day mortality compared to non-TXA treatment was observed. More high-quality studies are needed to show the significant benefit of using TXA, especially in moderate and severe TBI patient groups.
氨甲环酸在外伤性脑损伤中的作用:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。在许多病例中,tbi相关性颅内出血(ICH)与凝血功能障碍的高风险相关,并可能导致出血增长的风险增加。因此,氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种抗纤溶剂,通过抑制血凝块的分解来减少出血,可能会限制脑出血扩张。材料和方法:我们的目的是量化TXA对脑损伤的影响,因此使用PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、EMBASE和Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)对各自数据库建立至2021年4月10日之间发表的研究进行文献检索。结果:共纳入9项研究;其中5845例接受TXA治疗,5380例未接受TXA治疗。TXA组28天或住院死亡率为17.8%,而无TXA组为19.3% (or = 0.92;95% ci: 0.83, 1.01;P = 0.08)。随访6个月时,死亡率分别为18.3%和19.9% (OR = 0.91;95% ci: 0.63-1.31;p = 0.60),含和不含TXA。3项研究报告了格拉斯哥结局量表在28天随访时低于4分,分别为29.8%和34.8% (OR = 0.91;95% ci: 0.45, 1.82;p = 0.78),含和不含TXA。在TXA组和非TXA组之间没有发现不良事件的差异。结论:我们的分析发现,TBI患者的TXA和非TXA治疗之间没有统计学意义,然而,在TXA组中,与非TXA治疗相比,有降低28天死亡率的趋势。需要更多高质量的研究来证明使用TXA的显著益处,特别是在中度和重度TBI患者群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信