Interprofessional Education: Graduate Students’ Perspectives

J. Leflore, M. Bond, Mindi Anderson, Susan Baxley, Desiree A. Díaz
{"title":"Interprofessional Education: Graduate Students’ Perspectives","authors":"J. Leflore, M. Bond, Mindi Anderson, Susan Baxley, Desiree A. Díaz","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2017V7N1A219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This program evaluation used qualitative methodology to describe students’ expectations, concerns, needed supports, and experiences in a yearlong Interprofessional Education program. Methods and Findings: Focus groups were used to obtain the views of nurse practitioner and Master of social work students. Students participated in focus groups at the program beginning and completion. Interprofessional education competencies, expectations, and concerns were examined. Results showed that at the beginning, students indicated a desire to understand the other’s professional role. They also expressed concerns. During the post-program interviews, students indicated a desire to have had more classes and work together in clinical practice. Limitations included a lack of participation of all students in the final focus groups. Conclusions: Student input in a program is essential. Further research is needed. Keywords: Interprofessional education (IPE); Qualitative research; Student evaluation; Graduate education","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22230/JRIPE.2017V7N1A219","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2017V7N1A219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: This program evaluation used qualitative methodology to describe students’ expectations, concerns, needed supports, and experiences in a yearlong Interprofessional Education program. Methods and Findings: Focus groups were used to obtain the views of nurse practitioner and Master of social work students. Students participated in focus groups at the program beginning and completion. Interprofessional education competencies, expectations, and concerns were examined. Results showed that at the beginning, students indicated a desire to understand the other’s professional role. They also expressed concerns. During the post-program interviews, students indicated a desire to have had more classes and work together in clinical practice. Limitations included a lack of participation of all students in the final focus groups. Conclusions: Student input in a program is essential. Further research is needed. Keywords: Interprofessional education (IPE); Qualitative research; Student evaluation; Graduate education
跨专业教育:研究生的视角
背景:该项目评估使用定性方法来描述学生在为期一年的跨专业教育项目中的期望、担忧、需要的支持和经历。方法和发现:采用焦点小组的方法,获得执业护士和社会工作硕士生的意见。学生们在课程开始和结束时参加了焦点小组。研究了跨专业的教育能力、期望和关注点。结果表明,在一开始,学生们表示希望了解对方的职业角色。他们也表达了关切。在项目结束后的面试中,学生们表示希望有更多的课程,并在临床实践中共同努力。局限性包括没有让所有学生参加最后的重点小组。结论:学生在课程中的投入是必不可少的。还需要进一步的研究。关键词:跨专业教育;定性研究;学生评价;研究生教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书