Data for local decision-making, not a mere reporting requirement: development of an index to measure facility-level use of HMIS data

Jiage Qian, S. Shiferaw, A. Seme, Ousman E. Esmale, W. Denboba, Elizabeth K. Stierman, L. Zimmerman, A. Creanga
{"title":"Data for local decision-making, not a mere reporting requirement: development of an index to measure facility-level use of HMIS data","authors":"Jiage Qian, S. Shiferaw, A. Seme, Ousman E. Esmale, W. Denboba, Elizabeth K. Stierman, L. Zimmerman, A. Creanga","doi":"10.29392/001c.75141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Well-functioning health management information systems (HMIS) enable decision-making at all health system levels. This study develops an index to measure the use of HMIS data at the facility level. We used two rounds of cross-sectional data collected from 305 health facilities in Ethiopia in 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2020 (post-COVID-19). We constructed a summative, 10-item index using exploratory factor analysis and 2019 index development data; and used Cronbach’s alpha to assess reliability. To examine content validity, we mapped items against a previously published conceptual framework and consulted Ethiopian experts. We then employed one-way ANOVA and t-tests comparing the mean index scores overall and by key facility characteristics between 2019 and 2020. The 10-item index loaded on one factor (Cronbach’s alpha=0.74), and the index scores did not differ significantly by facility characteristics in 2019. The mean index score increased from 7.2 in 2019 to 7.9 in 2020 (P<0.01). During this period, more facilities received feedback on HMIS reports from facility leadership (19.3% difference); received actionable recommendations on performance targets and resource allocation (7.5% and 12.3% difference, respectively); and reviewed maternal deaths (15.1% difference); conversely, the proportion of facilities that held participatory performance review meetings monthly or more often decreased by 13.8% (all P <0.05). We propose a facility-level HMIS data use index and document an upward trend in HMIS data use in Ethiopia immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. Future research should further evaluate and refine the proposed index to support the measurement of HMIS data quality and utilization in Ethiopia and like settings.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.75141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well-functioning health management information systems (HMIS) enable decision-making at all health system levels. This study develops an index to measure the use of HMIS data at the facility level. We used two rounds of cross-sectional data collected from 305 health facilities in Ethiopia in 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2020 (post-COVID-19). We constructed a summative, 10-item index using exploratory factor analysis and 2019 index development data; and used Cronbach’s alpha to assess reliability. To examine content validity, we mapped items against a previously published conceptual framework and consulted Ethiopian experts. We then employed one-way ANOVA and t-tests comparing the mean index scores overall and by key facility characteristics between 2019 and 2020. The 10-item index loaded on one factor (Cronbach’s alpha=0.74), and the index scores did not differ significantly by facility characteristics in 2019. The mean index score increased from 7.2 in 2019 to 7.9 in 2020 (P<0.01). During this period, more facilities received feedback on HMIS reports from facility leadership (19.3% difference); received actionable recommendations on performance targets and resource allocation (7.5% and 12.3% difference, respectively); and reviewed maternal deaths (15.1% difference); conversely, the proportion of facilities that held participatory performance review meetings monthly or more often decreased by 13.8% (all P <0.05). We propose a facility-level HMIS data use index and document an upward trend in HMIS data use in Ethiopia immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. Future research should further evaluate and refine the proposed index to support the measurement of HMIS data quality and utilization in Ethiopia and like settings.
为地方决策提供数据,而不仅仅是报告要求:制定一个指数来衡量HMIS数据在设施一级的使用情况
运行良好的卫生管理信息系统(HMIS)使各级卫生系统的决策成为可能。本研究开发了一个指数来衡量HMIS数据在设施水平上的使用。我们使用了2019年(covid -19前)和2020年(covid -19后)从埃塞俄比亚305家卫生机构收集的两轮横断面数据。我们利用探索性因子分析和2019年指数发展数据构建了一个总结性的10项指数;并使用Cronbach 's alpha来评估可靠性。为了检查内容有效性,我们将项目映射到先前发布的概念框架并咨询了埃塞俄比亚专家。然后,我们采用单因素方差分析和t检验,比较了2019年至2020年期间总体和关键设施特征的平均指数得分。2019年,10项指数只依赖于一个因素(Cronbach’s alpha=0.74),不同设施特征的指数得分没有显著差异。平均指数得分由2019年的7.2分上升至2020年的7.9分(P<0.01)。在此期间,更多的设施收到了设施领导对HMIS报告的反馈(差异为19.3%);收到关于绩效目标和资源分配的可行建议(差异分别为7.5%和12.3%);审查了孕产妇死亡(差异15.1%);相反,每月或更频繁地举行参与式绩效考核会议的设施比例下降了13.8%(均P <0.05)。我们提出了一个设施级HMIS数据使用指数,并记录了在宣布COVID-19大流行后埃塞俄比亚HMIS数据使用的上升趋势。未来的研究应进一步评价和完善拟议的指数,以支持在埃塞俄比亚和类似环境中衡量HMIS数据质量和利用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信