Comparative Assessment of Isolated Liver Chemoperfusion Techniques

A. Kaprin, V. Unguryan, L. Petrov, S. A. Ivanov, V. V. Nazarova, Y. Pobedintseva, E. V. Filimonov, E. Kruglov
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Isolated Liver Chemoperfusion Techniques","authors":"A. Kaprin, V. Unguryan, L. Petrov, S. A. Ivanov, V. V. Nazarova, Y. Pobedintseva, E. V. Filimonov, E. Kruglov","doi":"10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-1-5-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Metastatic liver injury is a  distinct oncological problem, irrespective of primary malignancy. Resection surgery is not always feasible in such patients. Isolated liver chemoperfusion is a promising treatment option in multiple small-focal metastatic organic lesions. This technique is technically complex, which limits its broader evaluation and adoption in clinical practice. The diversity of isolated liver chemoperfusion techniques does not allow an adequate assessment of world experience and requires further research. The important considerations with introducing isolated liver chemoperfusion are: an optimal surgical technique, liver isolation control method, as well as physiological arterial and portal blood flow maintenance.Materials and methods. A total of 21 patients were surveyed over June 2020 — December 2021. The patients were divided into 3 prospective cohorts: A) arteriocaval chemoperfusion, midline laparotomy access, technical-guided liver isolation, B) arteriocaval chemoperfusion, “in J laparotomy” access, ICG-guided liver isolation, C) arterio-porto-caval chemoperfusion, “in J laparotomy” access, ICG-guided liver isolation. A procedure’s tolerance was assessed with: the duration of surgery, postoperative ICU bed-days, total postoperative bed-days, hepatic cytolysis rates, chemotherapy side-effects severity.Results and discussion. The duration of surgery shortened with “in J laparotomy”. Haemotoxicity did not differ between cohorts A and B, albeit appearing significantly lower in cohort C. The cytolytic syndrome duration statistically significantly reduced in C vs. A and B cohorts.Conclusion. All the isolated liver chemoperfusion techniques employed are patient-safe. In ICG-guided liver isolation, the agent leakage into systemic blood flow is less likely, indicating a lower haemotoxicity. Arterioportal isolated chemoperfusion is more physiological compared to other techniques, thus facilitating lower hepatotoxicity. The use of “in J laparotomy” significantly reduces liver mobilisation and vascular cannulation times. ","PeriodicalId":52846,"journal":{"name":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-1-5-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Metastatic liver injury is a  distinct oncological problem, irrespective of primary malignancy. Resection surgery is not always feasible in such patients. Isolated liver chemoperfusion is a promising treatment option in multiple small-focal metastatic organic lesions. This technique is technically complex, which limits its broader evaluation and adoption in clinical practice. The diversity of isolated liver chemoperfusion techniques does not allow an adequate assessment of world experience and requires further research. The important considerations with introducing isolated liver chemoperfusion are: an optimal surgical technique, liver isolation control method, as well as physiological arterial and portal blood flow maintenance.Materials and methods. A total of 21 patients were surveyed over June 2020 — December 2021. The patients were divided into 3 prospective cohorts: A) arteriocaval chemoperfusion, midline laparotomy access, technical-guided liver isolation, B) arteriocaval chemoperfusion, “in J laparotomy” access, ICG-guided liver isolation, C) arterio-porto-caval chemoperfusion, “in J laparotomy” access, ICG-guided liver isolation. A procedure’s tolerance was assessed with: the duration of surgery, postoperative ICU bed-days, total postoperative bed-days, hepatic cytolysis rates, chemotherapy side-effects severity.Results and discussion. The duration of surgery shortened with “in J laparotomy”. Haemotoxicity did not differ between cohorts A and B, albeit appearing significantly lower in cohort C. The cytolytic syndrome duration statistically significantly reduced in C vs. A and B cohorts.Conclusion. All the isolated liver chemoperfusion techniques employed are patient-safe. In ICG-guided liver isolation, the agent leakage into systemic blood flow is less likely, indicating a lower haemotoxicity. Arterioportal isolated chemoperfusion is more physiological compared to other techniques, thus facilitating lower hepatotoxicity. The use of “in J laparotomy” significantly reduces liver mobilisation and vascular cannulation times. 
离体肝化学灌流技术的比较评价
背景。转移性肝损伤是一个独特的肿瘤学问题,与原发恶性无关。切除手术对这类患者并不总是可行的。孤立肝化学灌注是一种很有前途的治疗选择,在多发性小局灶转移性有机病变。该技术技术复杂,限制了其在临床实践中的广泛评估和采用。孤立肝化学灌注技术的多样性不允许对世界经验进行充分的评估,需要进一步研究。引入孤立性肝化学灌流的重要考虑因素是:最佳手术技术,肝隔离控制方法,以及生理动脉和门静脉血流维持。材料和方法。在2020年6月至2021年12月期间,共有21名患者接受了调查。将患者分为3个前瞻性队列:A)动脉-腔静脉化疗灌流,开腹中线通道,技术引导下的肝脏隔离;B)动脉-腔静脉化疗灌流,“剖腹”通道,icg引导下的肝脏隔离;C)动脉-门-腔静脉化疗灌流,“剖腹”通道,icg引导下的肝脏隔离。通过手术时间、术后ICU住院日、术后总住院日、肝细胞溶解率、化疗副作用严重程度评估手术耐受性。结果和讨论。“剖腹术”缩短了手术时间。血液毒性在A组和B组之间没有差异,但在C组中明显降低。与A组和B组相比,C组的溶细胞综合征持续时间在统计学上显著缩短。所有采用的离体肝化学灌注技术都是患者安全的。在icg引导下的肝脏分离中,药物渗漏到全身血流的可能性较小,表明血液毒性较低。与其他技术相比,动脉门静脉分离的化学灌注更具有生理性,因此有助于降低肝毒性。使用“in J剖腹术”可显著减少肝脏活动和血管插管次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信