Development of bacterial resistance to the antimicrobials recovered from an aqueous fruit extract of Xylopia aethiopica

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Nnoli O. Chidinma, Adetayo E. Temidayo, Ogunjobi A. Adeniyi
{"title":"Development of bacterial resistance to the antimicrobials recovered from an aqueous fruit extract of Xylopia aethiopica","authors":"Nnoli O. Chidinma, Adetayo E. Temidayo, Ogunjobi A. Adeniyi","doi":"10.21608/nrmj.2021.199318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the use of antibiotics for the treatment of numerous infections and diseases increased significantly, and led to noticeable reduction in the rate of mortality and morbidity. The increased development of multidrug resistant bacterial strains that is attributable to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to the search for new antimicrobials of plants origin. This study aimed to assess the potentials of the multidrug resistant bacterial strains to develop resistance to the aqueous fruit extract of Xylopia aethiopica. The tested bacterial strains were; Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. In this study, on using the in vitro agar well diffusion assay; the bacterial strains exhibited different diameters of zones of inhibition; ranging from 1.75± 1.06 mm to 12.75± 1.06 mm, on treatment with various concentrations of the aqueous fruit extract. The recorded MIC value for E. coli was 250 mg/ ml, while the other bacterial strains recorded 125 mg/ ml. On the other hand, the obtained MBC value for Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis was 2000 mg/ ml, whereas E. coli and P. aeruginosa recorded 1000 mg/ ml. However, the MBC of B. cereus was not detected. The bacterial strains were subjected to a sub-optimal concentration of the extract after exposure for 5, 10, 15 and 20 d. After exposure for 20 d, P. aeruginosa expressed sensitivity only at 2000 mg /ml of the extract with a diameter of inhibition of 4.25± 0.35 mm. E. coli exhibited sensitivity at 2000 and 1000 mg/ ml, recording diameters of inhibition of 4.5± 0.71 mm and 2.50± 0.71 mm, respectively. The other strains exhibited resistance on treatment with 250 mg/ ml of the extract, except for B. cereus, which recorded inhibition diameter of 3.50 ±0.71 mm. This study demonstrated that exposure of the MDR resistant bacterial strains to a sub-optimal concentration of the aqueous fruit extract of Xylopia aethiopica could initiate resistance development.","PeriodicalId":34593,"journal":{"name":"Novel Research in Microbiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novel Research in Microbiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/nrmj.2021.199318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the use of antibiotics for the treatment of numerous infections and diseases increased significantly, and led to noticeable reduction in the rate of mortality and morbidity. The increased development of multidrug resistant bacterial strains that is attributable to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to the search for new antimicrobials of plants origin. This study aimed to assess the potentials of the multidrug resistant bacterial strains to develop resistance to the aqueous fruit extract of Xylopia aethiopica. The tested bacterial strains were; Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. In this study, on using the in vitro agar well diffusion assay; the bacterial strains exhibited different diameters of zones of inhibition; ranging from 1.75± 1.06 mm to 12.75± 1.06 mm, on treatment with various concentrations of the aqueous fruit extract. The recorded MIC value for E. coli was 250 mg/ ml, while the other bacterial strains recorded 125 mg/ ml. On the other hand, the obtained MBC value for Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis was 2000 mg/ ml, whereas E. coli and P. aeruginosa recorded 1000 mg/ ml. However, the MBC of B. cereus was not detected. The bacterial strains were subjected to a sub-optimal concentration of the extract after exposure for 5, 10, 15 and 20 d. After exposure for 20 d, P. aeruginosa expressed sensitivity only at 2000 mg /ml of the extract with a diameter of inhibition of 4.25± 0.35 mm. E. coli exhibited sensitivity at 2000 and 1000 mg/ ml, recording diameters of inhibition of 4.5± 0.71 mm and 2.50± 0.71 mm, respectively. The other strains exhibited resistance on treatment with 250 mg/ ml of the extract, except for B. cereus, which recorded inhibition diameter of 3.50 ±0.71 mm. This study demonstrated that exposure of the MDR resistant bacterial strains to a sub-optimal concentration of the aqueous fruit extract of Xylopia aethiopica could initiate resistance development.
从异木霉果实水提取物中回收抗菌药物的细菌耐药性研究进展
最近,用于治疗多种感染和疾病的抗生素的使用显著增加,并导致死亡率和发病率显著降低。由于滥用抗生素,多药耐药菌株的发展越来越多,这导致了对植物来源的新型抗菌药物的探索。本研究旨在评估多药耐药菌株对异木霉果实水提取物产生耐药性的潜力。测试的菌株为:;表皮葡萄球菌、腐生葡萄球菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和大肠杆菌。在本研究中,采用体外琼脂阱扩散法;菌株表现出不同直径的抑制区;范围为1.75±1.06mm至12.75±1.06mm。大肠杆菌的MIC记录值为250 mg/ml,而其他菌株的MIC值为125 mg/ml。另一方面,腐生葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌的MBC值为2000 mg/ml,大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的MBC记录值为1000 mg/ml。然而,没有检测到蜡样芽孢杆菌的MBC。细菌菌株在暴露5、10、15和20天后接受次优浓度的提取物。暴露20天后,铜绿假单胞菌仅在2000 mg/ml提取物下表现出敏感性,抑制直径为4.25±0.35 mm。大肠杆菌在2000和1000 mg/ml下表现出灵敏度,记录的抑制直径分别为4.5±0.71 mm和2.50±0.71 mm,分别地除蜡状芽孢杆菌外,其他菌株在用250mg/ml提取物处理时表现出耐药性,其抑制直径为3.50±0.71mm。本研究表明,耐多药菌株暴露于亚最佳浓度的异木霉果实水提取物中可以引发耐药性的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信