Malpractice Allegations in Adult and Pediatric Emergency Departments Resulting in Death

IF 0.3 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
E. Gürbüz, İ. Üzün, Erdem Hösükler, Bilgin Hösükler
{"title":"Malpractice Allegations in Adult and Pediatric Emergency Departments Resulting in Death","authors":"E. Gürbüz, İ. Üzün, Erdem Hösükler, Bilgin Hösükler","doi":"10.4274/eajem.galenos.2022.83713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to increase the awareness of physicians working in adult and pediatric emergency departments (ED) about malpractice allegations. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of cases with malpractice allegations occurring in ED from the lawsuit files decided by the First Specialization Board of the İstanbul Forensic Medicine Institute between 01/01/2012-31/12/2014. Results: Evaluation was made of 556 cases, comprising 357 (64.2%) males and 199 (35.8%) females, with a mean age of 38.92±24.8 years (minimum: 0, maximum: 87), with the highest number of cases in the 40-59 years age group (n=157, 28.2%). Two-thirds (n=377, 67.8%) of the cases with alleged medical malpractice occurred in a public hospital. The board decided that 24.4% (n=136) of the cases were medical malpractice. Of 556 cases, 1.102 physicians were accused and 151 physicians (13.7%) were found to be at fault by the board. More than half of the physicians accused of medical malpractice (51.7%) were general practitioners. The most common cause of malpractice in 136 files was diagnostic error (n=79, 58.1%). The most common actions of malpractice were failure to diagnose on time, and misdiagnosis (n=29, 21.3%). The most frequent diagnosis was trauma (n=156, 28.1%). Conclusion: Most of the malpractice allegations against the physicians working in the ED were unfounded and dismissed by the board. order to avoid diagnostic errors, it can be recommended that novice general practitioners should not be employed alone in ED without the support of more experienced colleagues.","PeriodicalId":11814,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2022.83713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to increase the awareness of physicians working in adult and pediatric emergency departments (ED) about malpractice allegations. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of cases with malpractice allegations occurring in ED from the lawsuit files decided by the First Specialization Board of the İstanbul Forensic Medicine Institute between 01/01/2012-31/12/2014. Results: Evaluation was made of 556 cases, comprising 357 (64.2%) males and 199 (35.8%) females, with a mean age of 38.92±24.8 years (minimum: 0, maximum: 87), with the highest number of cases in the 40-59 years age group (n=157, 28.2%). Two-thirds (n=377, 67.8%) of the cases with alleged medical malpractice occurred in a public hospital. The board decided that 24.4% (n=136) of the cases were medical malpractice. Of 556 cases, 1.102 physicians were accused and 151 physicians (13.7%) were found to be at fault by the board. More than half of the physicians accused of medical malpractice (51.7%) were general practitioners. The most common cause of malpractice in 136 files was diagnostic error (n=79, 58.1%). The most common actions of malpractice were failure to diagnose on time, and misdiagnosis (n=29, 21.3%). The most frequent diagnosis was trauma (n=156, 28.1%). Conclusion: Most of the malpractice allegations against the physicians working in the ED were unfounded and dismissed by the board. order to avoid diagnostic errors, it can be recommended that novice general practitioners should not be employed alone in ED without the support of more experienced colleagues.
在成人和儿童急诊部门导致死亡的医疗事故指控
目的:本研究旨在提高成人和儿科急诊科医生对医疗事故指控的认识。材料和方法:对伊斯坦布尔法医研究所第一专业委员会于2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日决定的诉讼文件中ED发生的渎职指控案件进行了回顾性分析。结果:对556例病例进行了评估,其中男性357例(64.2%),女性199例(35.8%),平均年龄38.92±24.8岁(最小值:0,最大值:87),其中40-59岁年龄组的病例数最高(n=157,28.2%)。三分之二(n=377,67.8%)的医疗事故发生在公立医院。委员会认定24.4%(n=136)的案件是医疗事故。在556起案件中,1.102名医生被指控,151名医生(13.7%)被委员会认定有过错。被指控医疗事故的医生中,有一半以上(51.7%)是全科医生。在136份档案中,医疗事故最常见的原因是诊断错误(n=79,58.1%)。最常见的医疗事故行为是未能及时诊断和误诊(n=29,21.3%)。最频繁的诊断是创伤(n=156,28.1%)。结论:大多数针对急诊科医生的医疗事故指控都是没有根据的,并被委员会驳回。为了避免诊断错误,可以建议,如果没有更有经验的同事的支持,新手全科医生不应该单独受雇于ED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信