Understanding the Role of Consent in Data Protection Regime: How Indonesia Can Learn From the GDPR

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
A. Lahuddin
{"title":"Understanding the Role of Consent in Data Protection Regime: How Indonesia Can Learn From the GDPR","authors":"A. Lahuddin","doi":"10.15742/ILREV.V11N2.716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of consent has received considerable critical attention in the data protection regime. The recent development of the data-driven economy, which heavily rely on data processing, have heightened the need for data protection. Furthermore, previous research has established that data processing deals with the individual’s fundamental rights where the processing would be considered as unlawful without prior individual’s consent. However, the Indonesian Government seems to not address these issues of consent in the data processing seriously, since currently there is no general data protection law. Conversely, the European Union’s (‘EU’) legislative history shows the reliance on consent as a measure for legitimising data processing. The General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’) provides the most comprehensive requirements of consent as a lawful ground of data processing. Interestingly, the concept of consent is a dominant feature in Indonesia’s proposed Personal Data Protection Law (‘PDPL’) which first introduced in 2015. The present research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of conditions of consent in the proposed PDPL, using the GDPR as the benchmark of the comparative analysis. The analysis revealed that the proposed PDPL fails to address the conditions of consent as comprehensive as the GDPR. It is argued that the substance of the proposed PDPL content was more or less a copy-paste of the concept and provisions from the GDPR without knowing the objective of such concept and provisions. This research provided a valuable opportunity to demonstrate that it is essential to include a comprehensive condition of consent within Indonesian data protection legislation.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ILREV.V11N2.716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of consent has received considerable critical attention in the data protection regime. The recent development of the data-driven economy, which heavily rely on data processing, have heightened the need for data protection. Furthermore, previous research has established that data processing deals with the individual’s fundamental rights where the processing would be considered as unlawful without prior individual’s consent. However, the Indonesian Government seems to not address these issues of consent in the data processing seriously, since currently there is no general data protection law. Conversely, the European Union’s (‘EU’) legislative history shows the reliance on consent as a measure for legitimising data processing. The General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’) provides the most comprehensive requirements of consent as a lawful ground of data processing. Interestingly, the concept of consent is a dominant feature in Indonesia’s proposed Personal Data Protection Law (‘PDPL’) which first introduced in 2015. The present research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of conditions of consent in the proposed PDPL, using the GDPR as the benchmark of the comparative analysis. The analysis revealed that the proposed PDPL fails to address the conditions of consent as comprehensive as the GDPR. It is argued that the substance of the proposed PDPL content was more or less a copy-paste of the concept and provisions from the GDPR without knowing the objective of such concept and provisions. This research provided a valuable opportunity to demonstrate that it is essential to include a comprehensive condition of consent within Indonesian data protection legislation.
理解同意在数据保护制度中的作用:印度尼西亚如何从GDPR中学习
在数据保护制度中,同意问题受到了相当重要的关注。近年来,数据驱动型经济的发展严重依赖于数据处理,这提高了对数据保护的需求。此外,先前的研究已经确定,数据处理涉及个人的基本权利,如果未经个人事先同意,处理将被视为非法。然而,印度尼西亚政府似乎没有认真处理数据处理中的这些同意问题,因为目前没有一般的数据保护法。相反,欧盟(“EU”)的立法历史表明,将同意作为数据处理合法化的一种措施。通用数据保护条例(“GDPR”)提供了最全面的同意要求,作为数据处理的合法依据。有趣的是,同意的概念是印度尼西亚于2015年首次提出的个人数据保护法(“PDPL”)的主要特征。本研究旨在评估拟议的PDPL中同意条件的有效性,并以GDPR作为比较分析的基准。分析显示,拟议的PDPL未能像GDPR那样全面地解决同意条件。本文认为,拟议的PDPL内容的实质或多或少是对GDPR概念和规定的复制粘贴,而不了解这些概念和规定的目的。这项研究提供了一个宝贵的机会,证明在印度尼西亚的数据保护立法中纳入一个全面的同意条件是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信