{"title":"In Defence of Danish Writers. The Daily Workings of the Press Bureau; or the Struggle for Sovereignty, 1940–1943","authors":"T. Andersen","doi":"10.1080/03468755.2022.2084156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates the way in which cultural censorship was practiced in Nazi-occupied Denmark, focusing on the Danish Press Bureau’s censorship of books in the period 1940–1943. From April 1940 to August 1943, the explicit German acceptance of Denmark as an independent state constituted a certain degree of internal sovereignty; often referred to as the illusion of sovereignty in Danish historiography. On the basis of new empirical studies and records of the Press Bureau, and with particular emphasis on two significant cases, this article argues that this illusion of sovereignty had an impact on the Danish administration of censorship, and it demonstrates the importance within the Press Bureau of maintaining the outward show of sovereignty. The article reveals that the formal political setting of the occupation had real administrative implications in negotiating with the German occupier in the sense that Danish authorities within the Press Bureau to some extent acted autonomously and even challenged direct German orders in relation to censorship. In doing so, the Press Bureau succeeded in defending Danish writers against further German pressures in some cases, which adds new insights regarding the peculiar form of political sovereignty that was constituted in Denmark.","PeriodicalId":45280,"journal":{"name":"SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY","volume":"48 1","pages":"206 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2022.2084156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article investigates the way in which cultural censorship was practiced in Nazi-occupied Denmark, focusing on the Danish Press Bureau’s censorship of books in the period 1940–1943. From April 1940 to August 1943, the explicit German acceptance of Denmark as an independent state constituted a certain degree of internal sovereignty; often referred to as the illusion of sovereignty in Danish historiography. On the basis of new empirical studies and records of the Press Bureau, and with particular emphasis on two significant cases, this article argues that this illusion of sovereignty had an impact on the Danish administration of censorship, and it demonstrates the importance within the Press Bureau of maintaining the outward show of sovereignty. The article reveals that the formal political setting of the occupation had real administrative implications in negotiating with the German occupier in the sense that Danish authorities within the Press Bureau to some extent acted autonomously and even challenged direct German orders in relation to censorship. In doing so, the Press Bureau succeeded in defending Danish writers against further German pressures in some cases, which adds new insights regarding the peculiar form of political sovereignty that was constituted in Denmark.
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of History presents articles on Scandinavian history and review essays surveying themes in recent Scandinavian historical research. It concentrates on perspectives of national historical particularities and important long-term and short-term developments. The editorial policy gives particular priority to Scandinavian topics and to efforts of placing Scandinavian developments into a larger context. Studies explicitly comparing Scandinavian processes and phenomena to those in other parts of the world are therefore regarded as particularly important. In addition to publishing articles and review essays, the journal includes short book reviews. Review essay proposals and polemical communications are welcomed.