Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry

Q1 Health Professions
K. Soh, P. Wallace
{"title":"Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry","authors":"K. Soh, P. Wallace","doi":"10.1002/cpcy.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent interest in high‐sensitivity multiple myeloma (MM) measurable residual disease (MRD) testing is a direct consequence of the high‐quality responses achieved using novel therapeutic agents and better treatment strategies. Traditional diagnostic measures such as immunohistochemistry and morphology have detection sensitivities of only 10−2 to 10−3, which do not reliably predict progression‐free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after these treatments. Contemporary monitoring of MM MRD has switched to more sensitive platforms such as allele‐specific oligonucleotide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ASO‐qPCR), next‐generation sequencing (NGS), and multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC). Though both ASO‐qPCR and NGS have excellent detection sensitivities (10−5 to 10−6), both technologies have lower applicability when compared to MFC. Conventional MFC can easily reach a detection sensitivity of 10−4 and when optimized can achieve a sensitivity of 10−5 to 10−6. Current consensus guidelines require a minimum of 2 million and recommend 5 million events be acquired to reach a minimum sensitivity of 10−5. As conventional immunophenotyping protocols are unable to attain these numbers, alternative MFC staining procedures are required. This article describes two high‐sensitivity MFC approaches that can be used for MM MRD testing. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.","PeriodicalId":11020,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Cytometry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpcy.63","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpcy.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Recent interest in high‐sensitivity multiple myeloma (MM) measurable residual disease (MRD) testing is a direct consequence of the high‐quality responses achieved using novel therapeutic agents and better treatment strategies. Traditional diagnostic measures such as immunohistochemistry and morphology have detection sensitivities of only 10−2 to 10−3, which do not reliably predict progression‐free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after these treatments. Contemporary monitoring of MM MRD has switched to more sensitive platforms such as allele‐specific oligonucleotide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ASO‐qPCR), next‐generation sequencing (NGS), and multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC). Though both ASO‐qPCR and NGS have excellent detection sensitivities (10−5 to 10−6), both technologies have lower applicability when compared to MFC. Conventional MFC can easily reach a detection sensitivity of 10−4 and when optimized can achieve a sensitivity of 10−5 to 10−6. Current consensus guidelines require a minimum of 2 million and recommend 5 million events be acquired to reach a minimum sensitivity of 10−5. As conventional immunophenotyping protocols are unable to attain these numbers, alternative MFC staining procedures are required. This article describes two high‐sensitivity MFC approaches that can be used for MM MRD testing. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
多参数流式细胞术监测多发性骨髓瘤可测残余疾病
最近对高灵敏度多发性骨髓瘤(MM)可测量残余疾病(MRD)检测的兴趣是使用新型治疗剂和更好的治疗策略获得高质量反应的直接结果。免疫组织化学和形态学等传统诊断方法的检测灵敏度仅为10-2至10-3,无法可靠预测这些治疗后的无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)。当代对MM MRD的监测已转向更敏感的平台,如等位基因特异性寡核苷酸定量聚合酶链式反应(ASO‐qPCR)、下一代测序(NGS)和多参数流式细胞术(MFC)。尽管ASO‐qPCR和NGS都具有优异的检测灵敏度(10−5至10−6),但与MFC相比,这两种技术的适用性较低。传统的MFC可以很容易地达到10−4的检测灵敏度,并且在优化时可以达到10−5到10−6的灵敏度。目前的共识指南要求至少200万次,并建议采集500万次事件,以达到10−5的最低灵敏度。由于传统的免疫表型方案无法达到这些数字,因此需要替代的MFC染色程序。本文介绍了两种可用于MM MRD测试的高灵敏度MFC方法。©2019 John Wiley&Sons,股份有限公司版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Protocols in Cytometry
Current Protocols in Cytometry Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published in affiliation with the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry, Current Protocols in Cytometry is a "best practices" collection that distills and organizes the absolute latest techniques from the top cytometry labs and specialists worldwide. It is the most complete set of peer-reviewed protocols for flow and image cytometry available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信