Evaluation of a care bundle to support healthcare workers wearing N95 masks

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Hermione Shea , Kathren Puyk , Michelle Tuck , Marcus Kusiak , Jaspreet Sidhu , Tracey Bucknall
{"title":"Evaluation of a care bundle to support healthcare workers wearing N95 masks","authors":"Hermione Shea ,&nbsp;Kathren Puyk ,&nbsp;Michelle Tuck ,&nbsp;Marcus Kusiak ,&nbsp;Jaspreet Sidhu ,&nbsp;Tracey Bucknall","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>N95 masks are required to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19, however, they are known to increase the risk of facial skin injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aims to assess staff knowledge, behaviours, and adverse outcomes, in relation to a care bundle, designed to prevent and manage facial skin injury in healthcare workers wearing N95 masks.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasi-experimental study design was used to compare outcomes for staff who were required to wear N95 masks and had access to a care bundle at a major metropolitan health service during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with those who did not. Staff were invited to participate in an anonymous survey.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The convenience sample included 758 participants and of these 31.3% accessed the care bundle. Post introduction of the care bundle, 59.8% developed facial injury compared with 72.7% who did not use the care bundle (p = 0.03). Of staff who accessed the care bundle, 28.7% developed acne<span>, compared with 49.5% who did not access the care bundle (p = 0.001). Statistically significant improvements in uptake of prevention and treatment strategies were found in those who accessed the care bundle, compared with those who did not.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This study has demonstrated the benefits of a care bundle to support healthcare workers wearing N95 masks. The bundle improved staff knowledge and reduced minor facial skin injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ongoing COVID-19 cases necessitate that healthcare workers continue to wear N95 masks for long and indefinite periods, and as such, the field remains an area for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 653-659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

N95 masks are required to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19, however, they are known to increase the risk of facial skin injuries.

Aims

This study aims to assess staff knowledge, behaviours, and adverse outcomes, in relation to a care bundle, designed to prevent and manage facial skin injury in healthcare workers wearing N95 masks.

Method

A quasi-experimental study design was used to compare outcomes for staff who were required to wear N95 masks and had access to a care bundle at a major metropolitan health service during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with those who did not. Staff were invited to participate in an anonymous survey.

Findings

The convenience sample included 758 participants and of these 31.3% accessed the care bundle. Post introduction of the care bundle, 59.8% developed facial injury compared with 72.7% who did not use the care bundle (p = 0.03). Of staff who accessed the care bundle, 28.7% developed acne, compared with 49.5% who did not access the care bundle (p = 0.001). Statistically significant improvements in uptake of prevention and treatment strategies were found in those who accessed the care bundle, compared with those who did not.

Discussion

This study has demonstrated the benefits of a care bundle to support healthcare workers wearing N95 masks. The bundle improved staff knowledge and reduced minor facial skin injuries.

Conclusion

Ongoing COVID-19 cases necessitate that healthcare workers continue to wear N95 masks for long and indefinite periods, and as such, the field remains an area for future research.

支持医护人员佩戴N95口罩的护理包评估
n95口罩是保护医护人员免受COVID-19感染的必要条件,但众所周知,它们会增加面部皮肤损伤的风险。目的本研究旨在评估医护人员的知识、行为和不良后果,这些知识、行为和不良后果与护理包有关,旨在预防和管理佩戴N95口罩的医护人员的面部皮肤损伤。方法采用准实验研究设计,比较在COVID-19大流行期间被要求戴N95口罩并在主要大都市卫生服务机构获得护理包的工作人员与未被要求戴N95口罩的工作人员的结果。员工被邀请参加一项匿名调查。便利性样本包括758名参与者,其中31.3%的人使用了护理包。引入护理包后,59.8%的患者出现面部损伤,而未使用护理包的患者为72.7% (p = 0.03)。在使用护理包的员工中,28.7%的人患了痤疮,而没有使用护理包的员工患痤疮的比例为49.5% (p = 0.001)。与那些没有获得护理包的人相比,获得护理包的人在预防和治疗策略的吸收方面有统计学上的显着改善。本研究证明了护理包支持医护人员佩戴N95口罩的好处。该束提高了工作人员的知识,减少了轻微的面部皮肤损伤。正在发生的COVID-19病例需要医护人员长期和无限期地继续佩戴N95口罩,因此,该领域仍然是未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信