"Should Female Physicians Treat Male Patients?": Doctoring the Other Sex, "Love Sickness," and Representations of the American Woman Doctor, 1850–1900

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
F.D.A. Wegener
{"title":"\"Should Female Physicians Treat Male Patients?\": Doctoring the Other Sex, \"Love Sickness,\" and Representations of the American Woman Doctor, 1850–1900","authors":"F.D.A. Wegener","doi":"10.1353/ARQ.2018.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:One urgent reason for the widespread opposition to the medical education and training of American women in the second half of the nineteenth century was the fact that women certified as doctors would be eligible to treat patients of the other sex, examining their bodies in a manner that provoked accusations of indelicacy or impropriety. Yet many of the period's numerous woman-doctor fictions depict the protagonist favorably ministering to male patients. There also appeared, however, a series of texts in which the medical woman's skills are comically traduced, as an ailing man is treated by a young, attractive female physician whose manipulations arouse the kind of \"love sickness\" that only she is equipped to \"cure.\" Such disparaging images competed with richer, more nuanced representations of women doctoring male patients in shaping the cultural, social, and professional reception of the medical woman in the United States throughout the period.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"74 1","pages":"145 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ARQ.2018.0025","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ARQ.2018.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:One urgent reason for the widespread opposition to the medical education and training of American women in the second half of the nineteenth century was the fact that women certified as doctors would be eligible to treat patients of the other sex, examining their bodies in a manner that provoked accusations of indelicacy or impropriety. Yet many of the period's numerous woman-doctor fictions depict the protagonist favorably ministering to male patients. There also appeared, however, a series of texts in which the medical woman's skills are comically traduced, as an ailing man is treated by a young, attractive female physician whose manipulations arouse the kind of "love sickness" that only she is equipped to "cure." Such disparaging images competed with richer, more nuanced representations of women doctoring male patients in shaping the cultural, social, and professional reception of the medical woman in the United States throughout the period.
“女医生应该治疗男性病人吗?”:治疗异性,“恋爱病”和美国女医生的表现,1850-1900
摘要:19世纪下半叶,美国女性普遍反对医学教育和培训的一个紧迫原因是,获得医生资格的女性将有资格治疗异性患者,以一种不礼貌或不得体的方式检查他们的身体,这会引发指责。然而,在这一时期众多的女医生小说中,有许多都描绘了主人公对男性病人的友善服务。然而,也出现了一系列的文本,在这些文本中,女医生的技能被滑稽地诋毁,因为一个生病的男人被一个年轻、有魅力的女医生治疗,她的操作引起了一种只有她有能力“治愈”的“热恋病”。这些贬损的形象与更丰富、更细致的女性医生男性病人的表现相竞争,形成了整个时期美国对女医生的文化、社会和专业接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信