Resting metabolic rate in healthy Singaporeans: Performance of the Harris-Benedict equation and a new predictive model

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Natalie Tan, K. Tham, Chun Keong Eric Ho, C. Ng
{"title":"Resting metabolic rate in healthy Singaporeans: Performance of the Harris-Benedict equation and a new predictive model","authors":"Natalie Tan, K. Tham, Chun Keong Eric Ho, C. Ng","doi":"10.1177/20101058231156628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction equations for resting metabolic rate (RMR) are valuable in managing patients’ weight; however, no accurate equation exists for Singaporeans. To develop and cross-validate a predictive regression equation for RMR in Singaporeans, using indirect calorimetry as the reference method. 104 healthy Singaporeans (34.3 ± 12.2 years) participated, comprising 34 men and 70 women. Anthropometric measurements and demographics information were obtained from participants. RMR was measured via indirect calorimetry (TrueOne 2400 system). Stepwise regression analysis was used to develop the most parsimonious predictive equation. Performance of the equation was evaluated using ordinary least products (OLP) regression and Bland–Altman analysis, whilst internal cross-validation was performed by use of the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) method. To compare the new equation with existing ones, the performance of the Harris-Benedict equation was also evaluated. The best predictive equation takes the form RMR(kcal) = 918 + 16.5(weight)-135.7(gender) - 1152(Waist-to-height-ratio) +0.014(International Physical Activity Questionnaire Score), where gender = 1 (female) or 0 (male). OLP regression revealed no systematic bias for the new equation. Bland–Altman analysis showed that its total (systematic and random) error was 212 kcal. Internal model validation using the PRESS method revealed minimal reduction in predictive accuracy. In contrast, OLP regression showed a significant pattern of over-prediction by the Harris-Benedict equation (y-intercept = −280 kcal; 95%CI, −100 to −461 kcal). Our new equation outperformed the Harris-Benedict equation in accurately predicting RMR in Singaporeans. Comprising easily obtained anthropometric and self-reported measures, we envisage its potential relevance in clinical and epidemiological settings.","PeriodicalId":44685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058231156628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prediction equations for resting metabolic rate (RMR) are valuable in managing patients’ weight; however, no accurate equation exists for Singaporeans. To develop and cross-validate a predictive regression equation for RMR in Singaporeans, using indirect calorimetry as the reference method. 104 healthy Singaporeans (34.3 ± 12.2 years) participated, comprising 34 men and 70 women. Anthropometric measurements and demographics information were obtained from participants. RMR was measured via indirect calorimetry (TrueOne 2400 system). Stepwise regression analysis was used to develop the most parsimonious predictive equation. Performance of the equation was evaluated using ordinary least products (OLP) regression and Bland–Altman analysis, whilst internal cross-validation was performed by use of the predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) method. To compare the new equation with existing ones, the performance of the Harris-Benedict equation was also evaluated. The best predictive equation takes the form RMR(kcal) = 918 + 16.5(weight)-135.7(gender) - 1152(Waist-to-height-ratio) +0.014(International Physical Activity Questionnaire Score), where gender = 1 (female) or 0 (male). OLP regression revealed no systematic bias for the new equation. Bland–Altman analysis showed that its total (systematic and random) error was 212 kcal. Internal model validation using the PRESS method revealed minimal reduction in predictive accuracy. In contrast, OLP regression showed a significant pattern of over-prediction by the Harris-Benedict equation (y-intercept = −280 kcal; 95%CI, −100 to −461 kcal). Our new equation outperformed the Harris-Benedict equation in accurately predicting RMR in Singaporeans. Comprising easily obtained anthropometric and self-reported measures, we envisage its potential relevance in clinical and epidemiological settings.
健康新加坡人的静息代谢率:Harris-Benedict方程的性能和一个新的预测模型
静息代谢率(RMR)预测方程在管理患者体重方面是有价值的;然而,对于新加坡人来说,没有准确的公式。以间接量热法为参考方法,建立并交叉验证新加坡人RMR预测回归方程。104名健康新加坡人(34.3±12.2岁)参与研究,其中男性34人,女性70人。从参与者那里获得了人体测量数据和人口统计信息。RMR采用间接量热法(TrueOne 2400系统)测量。采用逐步回归分析建立了最简洁的预测方程。使用普通最小积(OLP)回归和Bland-Altman分析对方程的性能进行评估,同时使用预测残差平方和(PRESS)方法进行内部交叉验证。为了将新方程与现有方程进行比较,还对Harris-Benedict方程的性能进行了评价。最佳预测方程为RMR(kcal) = 918 + 16.5(体重)-135.7(性别)- 1152(腰高比)+0.014(国际体育活动问卷得分),其中性别= 1(女性)或0(男性)。OLP回归显示新方程没有系统偏差。Bland-Altman分析显示其总(系统和随机)误差为212千卡。使用PRESS方法的内部模型验证显示预测准确性的最小降低。相比之下,OLP回归显示出哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程(y-截距= - 280 kcal;95%CI,−100 ~−461 kcal)。我们的新方程在准确预测新加坡人的RMR方面优于哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程。包括容易获得的人体测量和自我报告的测量,我们设想其在临床和流行病学设置的潜在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信