«Freinet Chimneys»: Experimenting with Emancipatory Public Education (Geneva in the 60s to 80s). Piaget’s Dream of an Active School?

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rita Hofstetter
{"title":"«Freinet Chimneys»: Experimenting with Emancipatory Public Education (Geneva in the 60s to 80s). Piaget’s Dream of an Active School?","authors":"Rita Hofstetter","doi":"10.14516/ete.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emancipatory potential of the 1960s had a particular resonance in Swiss education in the French-speaking part of the country. Teachers, parents and unionists, all advocating Freinet pedagogy, demanded that the demonised public education be reformed. Retracing the main steps of their successes and setbacks in the sector of Geneva public education, this article enquires into the rhetorical strategies and tactical alliances the reformists mobilised in order to promote «schools open to life», respectful of the natural longing to learn thanks to educational streams in primary schools dedicated to their cause (the «Freinet chimneys» implemented for a while at the turn of the 1980s). Inputs address the way the leaders of the reform historicised their initiatives so as to establish rightful filiation, calling upon some major figures whilst neglecting others. The scientific approval of Jean Piaget and Elise Freinet, as well as part of the left-wing party in power, might have endorsed the project; nonetheless, the leading figures of Geneva New Education were rarely invoked. How should we interpret these twists and turns? How were the narratives being scripted, and by whom? How were the innovations tested by others and integrated elsewhere so as to support the public education reform? Analysis of the underlying dynamics of this experiment reveal how «everyday» people rose up in a crisis and seized the opportunity to open up a world of possibilities; this can be highlighted through the lenses of the notion of «protagonism», which brings together «ordinary» people and their «extraordinary» politicisation (Bantigny, 2018; Deluermoz & Gobille, 2015).","PeriodicalId":41950,"journal":{"name":"Espacio Tiempo y Educacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espacio Tiempo y Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The emancipatory potential of the 1960s had a particular resonance in Swiss education in the French-speaking part of the country. Teachers, parents and unionists, all advocating Freinet pedagogy, demanded that the demonised public education be reformed. Retracing the main steps of their successes and setbacks in the sector of Geneva public education, this article enquires into the rhetorical strategies and tactical alliances the reformists mobilised in order to promote «schools open to life», respectful of the natural longing to learn thanks to educational streams in primary schools dedicated to their cause (the «Freinet chimneys» implemented for a while at the turn of the 1980s). Inputs address the way the leaders of the reform historicised their initiatives so as to establish rightful filiation, calling upon some major figures whilst neglecting others. The scientific approval of Jean Piaget and Elise Freinet, as well as part of the left-wing party in power, might have endorsed the project; nonetheless, the leading figures of Geneva New Education were rarely invoked. How should we interpret these twists and turns? How were the narratives being scripted, and by whom? How were the innovations tested by others and integrated elsewhere so as to support the public education reform? Analysis of the underlying dynamics of this experiment reveal how «everyday» people rose up in a crisis and seized the opportunity to open up a world of possibilities; this can be highlighted through the lenses of the notion of «protagonism», which brings together «ordinary» people and their «extraordinary» politicisation (Bantigny, 2018; Deluermoz & Gobille, 2015).
«Freinet烟囱»:解放式公共教育的实验(60年代至80年代的日内瓦)。皮亚杰的活跃学校之梦?
20世纪60年代的解放潜力在瑞士法语区的教育中引起了特别的共鸣。教师、家长和工会主义者都主张Freinet教育法,要求对被妖魔化的公共教育进行改革。回顾他们在日内瓦公共教育领域的成功和挫折的主要步骤,本文探讨了改革派为促进“学校向生活开放”而动员的修辞策略和战术联盟,由于小学的教育流致力于他们的事业(在20世纪80年代初实施了一段时间的“Freinet烟囱”),尊重对学习的自然渴望。投入涉及改革领导人将其举措历史化的方式,以建立合法的附属机构,呼吁一些主要人物,而忽视其他人。Jean Piaget和Elise Freinet的科学批准,以及执政的左翼政党的一部分,可能支持了该项目;尽管如此,日内瓦新教育的领军人物却很少被提及。我们应该如何解读这些曲折?这些叙述是如何编写的,是由谁编写的?这些创新是如何被其他人测试并整合到其他地方以支持公共教育改革的?对这项实验的潜在动力的分析揭示了“日常”人们是如何在危机中崛起并抓住机会打开一个充满可能性的世界的;这可以通过“对抗主义”概念的视角来强调,它将“普通”人和他们的“非凡”政治化结合在一起(Bantiny,2018;Deluermoz和Gobille,2015)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Espacio Tiempo y Educacion
Espacio Tiempo y Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信