{"title":"Diplomacy and the Modern Novel: France, Britain, and the Mission of Literature ed. by Isabelle Daunais and Allan Hepburn (review)","authors":"D. Cohen","doi":"10.1353/mod.2023.a902612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"215 through which Julie experiments with and rejects norms of white womanhood and also at times aligns herself metaphorically with the enslaved Black characters in the film. As Stern argues, this pattern concludes with Julie riding off on a cart of yellow fever victims—a different kind of “social death” than that described by Orlando Patterson, but one which illustrates the kind of “affinity” across racial lines that Stern traces across Davis’s career (50). One result of Stern’s careful readings of costume and makeup is a stunning account of whiteness in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? As the penultimate chapter, this reading of Jane’s maniacal efforts as a clutching at white privilege and politics of resentment in the film’s present of 1962 represents a culmination of the work Stern has carefully prepared to this point. She argues, “Bette Davis’s whiteface masquerade . . . would mark an attempt to solidify her social status above the African American housekeeper. She believes Elvira has kicked her down the chain of being. As ultra-white, there can be no mistaking her station” (153). The argument of this chapter is one that will make readers want to revisit this cult classic to consider its deeper significance and perhaps teach the film rather than leaving it to late-night screenings. In addition to being an enjoyable read, it is easy to imagine this book being incorporated into classes on race and popular culture alongside other recent books such as Miriam Petty’s Stealing the Show and Alisha Gaines’s Black for a Day. Together, these books consider the way fan attachments and star turns complicate theories of cross-racial identification and the staging of racial difference. Turning to an iconic white actress and her racialized performances onscreen and off, Bette Davis Black and White offers a model for engagement with stardom that may be at once deeply personal and idiosyncratic and culturally significant.","PeriodicalId":18699,"journal":{"name":"Modernism/modernity","volume":"30 1","pages":"215 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernism/modernity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2023.a902612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
215 through which Julie experiments with and rejects norms of white womanhood and also at times aligns herself metaphorically with the enslaved Black characters in the film. As Stern argues, this pattern concludes with Julie riding off on a cart of yellow fever victims—a different kind of “social death” than that described by Orlando Patterson, but one which illustrates the kind of “affinity” across racial lines that Stern traces across Davis’s career (50). One result of Stern’s careful readings of costume and makeup is a stunning account of whiteness in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? As the penultimate chapter, this reading of Jane’s maniacal efforts as a clutching at white privilege and politics of resentment in the film’s present of 1962 represents a culmination of the work Stern has carefully prepared to this point. She argues, “Bette Davis’s whiteface masquerade . . . would mark an attempt to solidify her social status above the African American housekeeper. She believes Elvira has kicked her down the chain of being. As ultra-white, there can be no mistaking her station” (153). The argument of this chapter is one that will make readers want to revisit this cult classic to consider its deeper significance and perhaps teach the film rather than leaving it to late-night screenings. In addition to being an enjoyable read, it is easy to imagine this book being incorporated into classes on race and popular culture alongside other recent books such as Miriam Petty’s Stealing the Show and Alisha Gaines’s Black for a Day. Together, these books consider the way fan attachments and star turns complicate theories of cross-racial identification and the staging of racial difference. Turning to an iconic white actress and her racialized performances onscreen and off, Bette Davis Black and White offers a model for engagement with stardom that may be at once deeply personal and idiosyncratic and culturally significant.
215中,朱莉尝试并拒绝白人女性的规范,有时也会隐喻性地与电影中被奴役的黑人角色结盟。正如Stern所说,这种模式的结局是Julie骑着一车黄热病患者离开——这与Orlando Patterson所描述的“社会死亡”不同,但它说明了Stern在Davis的职业生涯中所追溯的那种跨越种族界限的“亲和力”(50)。斯特恩仔细阅读服装和妆容的一个结果是,在《简宝宝发生了什么?作为倒数第二章,这本书解读了简在1962年的电影中对白人特权和怨恨政治的疯狂努力,代表了斯特恩为此精心准备的工作的高潮。她认为,“贝蒂·戴维斯的白脸伪装……将标志着她试图巩固自己在非裔美国管家之上的社会地位。她认为埃尔维拉已经把她踢下了存在的链条。作为超白人,她的地位是毋庸置疑的”(153)。这一章的论点会让读者想重温这部邪典,思考它更深层次的意义,也许可以教这部电影,而不是让它在深夜上映。除了令人愉快的阅读之外,很容易想象这本书与米里亚姆·佩蒂的《偷秀》和艾丽莎·盖恩斯的《一天的黑人》等其他新书一起被纳入种族和流行文化课程。这些书共同考虑了粉丝依恋和明星转向如何使跨种族认同理论和种族差异的分期复杂化。贝蒂·戴维斯(Bette Davis Black and white)讲述了一位标志性的白人女演员,以及她在银幕内外的种族化表演,她为与明星的互动提供了一个模式,这可能同时具有深刻的个人、特质和文化意义。
期刊介绍:
Concentrating on the period extending roughly from 1860 to the present, Modernism/Modernity focuses on the methodological, archival, and theoretical exigencies particular to modernist studies. It encourages an interdisciplinary approach linking music, architecture, the visual arts, literature, and social and intellectual history. The journal"s broad scope fosters dialogue between social scientists and humanists about the history of modernism and its relations tomodernization. Each issue features a section of thematic essays as well as book reviews and a list of books received. Modernism/Modernity is now the official journal of the Modernist Studies Association.