Chemistry Lesson Plan Design and Teaching: A Case Study of Senior Secondary Schools in the Urban Regions of the Gambia

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Chemistry Lesson Plan Design and Teaching: A Case Study of Senior\nSecondary Schools in the Urban Regions of the Gambia","authors":"","doi":"10.51709/19951272/summer2022/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to understand chemistry lesson plan design and teaching at\nsecondary schools with 14 teachers and 282 students, grade 11, through\nRandomized Post-test Control Group Design, placed in each experimental and\ncontrol group. The experimental group was taught using multifunctional\napproaches, social constructivism, and laboratory experimentations. The\ncontrol group was taught using traditional methods and laboratory\nexperimentations, focusing on concepts of acids, bases, and salts. Indicators\nsuch as lesson topic, objectives, activities, evaluations, and conclusions were\nthematically reviewed, while teaching categories such as lesson organisation,\nactivities teaching, pedagogical approaches, collaborative learning, teacher-\nstudent interaction, instructional resources, and students' academic performance\nwere quantitatively analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to obtain\nfrequency per cent (%), weighted mean, and standard deviation. The finding\nshows that teachers were knowledgeable about designing a chemistry lesson\neven though they followed the same trajectory and were inadequately prepared.\nIn addition, only pedagogical approaches and instructional resources were\nmoderately utilised among the teaching categories. Further, students in the\nexperimental group performed better academically, as measured by their mean\ndifference (12.121), significant (t = 6.142, p =.000), which may be attributed to\nparadigm-shifting from teacher-centred to the students-centred, instructional\nresources, students’ ability, and motivation. Therefore, the current lesson plan\ndesign as a case study in the chemistry classroom implies that effective lesson\nplans and teaching can lead to better learning of core competencies in the\nGambian context if they were to be monitored and improved extensively.\nHowever, a further study may be needed by comparing the difference between\npre-test and post-test scores, as this will indicate a better measure","PeriodicalId":43392,"journal":{"name":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/summer2022/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to understand chemistry lesson plan design and teaching at secondary schools with 14 teachers and 282 students, grade 11, through Randomized Post-test Control Group Design, placed in each experimental and control group. The experimental group was taught using multifunctional approaches, social constructivism, and laboratory experimentations. The control group was taught using traditional methods and laboratory experimentations, focusing on concepts of acids, bases, and salts. Indicators such as lesson topic, objectives, activities, evaluations, and conclusions were thematically reviewed, while teaching categories such as lesson organisation, activities teaching, pedagogical approaches, collaborative learning, teacher- student interaction, instructional resources, and students' academic performance were quantitatively analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to obtain frequency per cent (%), weighted mean, and standard deviation. The finding shows that teachers were knowledgeable about designing a chemistry lesson even though they followed the same trajectory and were inadequately prepared. In addition, only pedagogical approaches and instructional resources were moderately utilised among the teaching categories. Further, students in the experimental group performed better academically, as measured by their mean difference (12.121), significant (t = 6.142, p =.000), which may be attributed to paradigm-shifting from teacher-centred to the students-centred, instructional resources, students’ ability, and motivation. Therefore, the current lesson plan design as a case study in the chemistry classroom implies that effective lesson plans and teaching can lead to better learning of core competencies in the Gambian context if they were to be monitored and improved extensively. However, a further study may be needed by comparing the difference between pre-test and post-test scores, as this will indicate a better measure
化学课程计划设计与教学——以冈比亚城市地区高中为例
本研究以中学11年级14名教师和282名学生为研究对象,通过测试后随机控制组设计,分别分为实验组和对照组,了解中学化学教案的设计和教学情况。实验组采用多功能教学法、社会建构主义和实验室实验相结合的教学方法。对照组采用传统方法和实验室实验进行教学,重点讲授酸、碱和盐的概念。对课程主题、目标、活动、评价和结论等指标进行了专题审查,对课程组织、活动教学、教学方法、协作学习、师生互动、教学资源和学生学业成绩等教学类别进行了定量分析。描述性统计用于获得频率百分比(%)、加权平均值和标准差。研究结果表明,尽管教师们遵循相同的轨迹,并且准备不足,但他们对化学课程的设计还是很了解的。此外,在教学类别中,只有教学方法和教学资源得到适度利用。此外,实验组的学生在学业上表现更好,通过他们的平均差异(12.121)来衡量,显著(t = 6.142, p =.000),这可能归因于范式的转变,从以教师为中心到以学生为中心,教学资源,学生的能力和动机。因此,当前的课程计划作为化学课堂的案例研究表明,有效的课程计划和教学如果得到广泛的监督和改进,可以在冈比亚环境下更好地学习核心能力。然而,可能需要通过比较测试前和测试后分数的差异进行进一步的研究,因为这将表明更好的测量方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FWU Journal of Social Sciences
FWU Journal of Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
57.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信