Leading Equitable Distance Education During Times of Crisis

IF 0.8 4区教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Education and Urban Society Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1177/00131245221121665

A. Anthony, Dustin Miller

引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 shed light on persistent disparities among K-12 school districts, particularly regarding technology access, its use, and educational outcomes. Although resources exist to inform the design and delivery of distance education at the course level, there is a lack of resources to inform program-level decisions about equitable distance education that impact educators and learners across a school system. Drawing on existing literature on educational equity, this article discusses four ways schools may frame equitable distance education. This article also discusses critical lessons schools learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about sustaining equitable technology-supported learning environments during times of crisis.

查看原文本刊更多论文

危机时期领导公平的远程教育

2019冠状病毒病揭示了K-12学区之间持续存在的差异，特别是在技术获取、使用和教育成果方面。尽管有资源可以在课程层面上为远程教育的设计和交付提供信息，但在影响整个学校系统的教育者和学习者的公平远程教育方面，缺乏资源可以为项目层面的决策提供信息。根据现有的教育公平文献，本文讨论了学校构建公平远程教育的四种方式。本文还讨论了学校从2019冠状病毒病大流行中学到的在危机时期维持公平的技术支持学习环境的重要经验。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Education and Urban Society Multiple-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Education and Urban Society (EUS) is a multidisciplinary journal that examines the role of education as a social institution in an increasingly urban and multicultural society. To this end, EUS publishes articles exploring the functions of educational institutions, policies, and processes in light of national concerns for improving the environment of urban schools that seek to provide equal educational opportunities for all students. EUS welcomes articles based on practice and research with an explicit urban context or component that examine the role of education from a variety of perspectives including, but not limited to, those based on empirical analyses, action research, and ethnographic perspectives as well as those that view education from philosophical, historical, policy, and/or legal points of view.lyses.