Becoming a research participant: Decision-making needs of individuals with neuromuscular diseases

V. Gauthier, Marie-Eve Poitras, Mélissa Lavoie, B. Gallais, Samar Muslemani, Michel Boivin, Marc Tremblay, C. Gagnon
{"title":"Becoming a research participant: Decision-making needs of individuals with neuromuscular diseases","authors":"V. Gauthier, Marie-Eve Poitras, Mélissa Lavoie, B. Gallais, Samar Muslemani, Michel Boivin, Marc Tremblay, C. Gagnon","doi":"10.3233/trd-220057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Research has shown that some people with neuromuscular diseases may have a lower level of education due to lower socioeconomic status and possibly compromised health literacy. In view of these data, it appears important to document their decision-making needs to ensure better support when faced with the decision to participate or not in research projects. OBJECTIVES: 1) To document the decision-making needs of individuals with neuromuscular diseases to participate in research; 2) To explore their preferences regarding the format of knowledge translation tools related to research participation. Methods: This qualitative study is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A two-step descriptive study was conducted to capture the decision-making needs of people with neuromuscular diseases related to research participation: 1) Individual semi-directed interviews (with people with neuromuscular diseases) and focus groups (with healthcare professionals); 2) Synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: The semi-directed interviews (n = 11), the two focus groups (n = 11) and the literature synthesis (n = 50 articles) identified information needs such as learning about ongoing research projects, scientific advances and research results, the potential benefits and risks associated with different types of research projects, and identified values surrounding research participation: helping other generations, trust, obtaining better clinical follow-up, and socialization. CONCLUSION: This paper provides useful recommendations to support researchers and clinicians in developing material to inform individuals with neuromuscular diseases about research participation.","PeriodicalId":75246,"journal":{"name":"Translational science of rare diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational science of rare diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/trd-220057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that some people with neuromuscular diseases may have a lower level of education due to lower socioeconomic status and possibly compromised health literacy. In view of these data, it appears important to document their decision-making needs to ensure better support when faced with the decision to participate or not in research projects. OBJECTIVES: 1) To document the decision-making needs of individuals with neuromuscular diseases to participate in research; 2) To explore their preferences regarding the format of knowledge translation tools related to research participation. Methods: This qualitative study is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A two-step descriptive study was conducted to capture the decision-making needs of people with neuromuscular diseases related to research participation: 1) Individual semi-directed interviews (with people with neuromuscular diseases) and focus groups (with healthcare professionals); 2) Synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: The semi-directed interviews (n = 11), the two focus groups (n = 11) and the literature synthesis (n = 50 articles) identified information needs such as learning about ongoing research projects, scientific advances and research results, the potential benefits and risks associated with different types of research projects, and identified values surrounding research participation: helping other generations, trust, obtaining better clinical follow-up, and socialization. CONCLUSION: This paper provides useful recommendations to support researchers and clinicians in developing material to inform individuals with neuromuscular diseases about research participation.
成为研究参与者:神经肌肉疾病患者的决策需求
背景:研究表明,由于社会经济地位较低,一些患有神经肌肉疾病的人的教育水平可能较低,健康素养可能受损。鉴于这些数据,记录他们的决策需求似乎很重要,以确保在面临参与或不参与研究项目的决定时得到更好的支持。目的:1)记录神经肌肉疾病患者参与研究的决策需求;2) 探讨他们对与研究参与相关的知识翻译工具格式的偏好。方法:本定性研究基于渥太华决策支持框架。进行了一项分两步的描述性研究,以了解神经肌肉疾病患者与研究参与相关的决策需求:1)个人半直接访谈(与神经肌肉疾病的患者)和焦点小组(与医疗保健专业人员);2) 文献综述。结果:半定向访谈(n = 11) ,两个焦点组(n = 11) 以及文献综合(n = 50篇文章)确定了信息需求,如了解正在进行的研究项目、科学进展和研究结果、与不同类型的研究项目相关的潜在利益和风险,以及围绕研究参与确定的价值观:帮助其他几代人、信任、获得更好的临床随访和社会化。结论:本文为支持研究人员和临床医生开发材料提供了有用的建议,以告知神经肌肉疾病患者参与研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信