Study on evaluation indicator system of disease prevention and control workload for Beijing′s public hospitals

A. Mao, Kun Wang, Y. Meng, Yu-jie Yang, P. Dong, Guangyu Hu, Xiao-ling Yan
{"title":"Study on evaluation indicator system of disease prevention and control workload for Beijing′s public hospitals","authors":"A. Mao, Kun Wang, Y. Meng, Yu-jie Yang, P. Dong, Guangyu Hu, Xiao-ling Yan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the establishment of an evaluation indicator system for disease prevention and control workload at public hospitals, based on the current situation of disease prevention and control work undertaken by public hospitals of and above secondary level in Beijing, and to provide evaluation assistance for them to do better in this regard. \n \n \nMethods \nThis research was based on our pervious study of the current situation description of disease prevention and control work undertaken by public hospitals in Beijing, by which the contents of routine disease prevention and control work at hospitals have been initially established. The unit strength of each work was consulted, and the disease prevention and control work was classified according to the results. Meanwhile the consistency test of the work intensity within the category was carried out. After integration, the classification and evaluation indicator of disease prevention and control work in public hospitals of and above secondary level in Beijing was finally established. \n \n \nResults \nThe workload evaluation indicator system was divided into eight parts: report work, report quality control work, monitoring work, training work, work of public health related clinical diagnosis and treatment, work of clinical examination and vaccination, work of sampling and testing and public health related consultation work. The work intensity of each category ranged from 4.78 to 7.34. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe evaluation indicator system of workload is suitable for the evaluation of basic works. The unified transformation of workload by using the value of work intensity is conducive to management evaluation, but the limitation of the indicators exists in time and region, making it necessary to adjust by the local specific situation at the promotion and application level. \n \n \nKey words: \nHospitals, public; Disease prevention and control; Evaluation; Indicator system","PeriodicalId":56974,"journal":{"name":"中华医院管理杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"738-742"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医院管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the establishment of an evaluation indicator system for disease prevention and control workload at public hospitals, based on the current situation of disease prevention and control work undertaken by public hospitals of and above secondary level in Beijing, and to provide evaluation assistance for them to do better in this regard. Methods This research was based on our pervious study of the current situation description of disease prevention and control work undertaken by public hospitals in Beijing, by which the contents of routine disease prevention and control work at hospitals have been initially established. The unit strength of each work was consulted, and the disease prevention and control work was classified according to the results. Meanwhile the consistency test of the work intensity within the category was carried out. After integration, the classification and evaluation indicator of disease prevention and control work in public hospitals of and above secondary level in Beijing was finally established. Results The workload evaluation indicator system was divided into eight parts: report work, report quality control work, monitoring work, training work, work of public health related clinical diagnosis and treatment, work of clinical examination and vaccination, work of sampling and testing and public health related consultation work. The work intensity of each category ranged from 4.78 to 7.34. Conclusions The evaluation indicator system of workload is suitable for the evaluation of basic works. The unified transformation of workload by using the value of work intensity is conducive to management evaluation, but the limitation of the indicators exists in time and region, making it necessary to adjust by the local specific situation at the promotion and application level. Key words: Hospitals, public; Disease prevention and control; Evaluation; Indicator system
北京市公立医院疾病预防控制工作量评价指标体系研究
目的根据北京市二级以上公立医院疾病预防控制工作的现状,探索建立公立医院疾病防治工作量评价指标体系,为公立医院更好地开展疾病预防控制提供评价依据。方法本研究是在对北京市公立医院疾病预防控制工作现状描述的基础上进行的,初步确立了医院常规疾病预防控制的内容。咨询了各项工作的单位力量,并根据结果对疾病预防控制工作进行了分类。同时对该类别内的工作强度进行了一致性检验。经过整合,最终建立了北京市二级及以上公立医院疾病预防控制工作分类评价指标。结果工作量评估指标体系分为报告工作、报告质量控制工作、监测工作、培训工作、公共卫生相关临床诊疗工作、临床检查和疫苗接种工作、采样检测工作和公共卫生相关咨询工作八个部分。每个类别的工作强度在4.78至7.34之间。结论工作量评价指标体系适用于基础工作的评价。利用工作强度值统一转换工作量有利于管理评价,但指标在时间和区域上存在局限性,需要在推广应用层面根据当地具体情况进行调整。关键词:医院,公共;疾病预防和控制;评估;指示灯系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9658
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信