Comparison of intensity-based methods for automatic speech rate computation

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS
Loquens Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.3989/loquens.2022.e090
Wendy Elvira-García, M. Farrús, Juan María Garrido Almiñana
{"title":"Comparison of intensity-based methods for automatic speech rate computation","authors":"Wendy Elvira-García, M. Farrús, Juan María Garrido Almiñana","doi":"10.3989/loquens.2022.e090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automatic computation of speech rate is a necessary task in a wide range of applications that require this prosodic feature, in which a manual transcription and time alignments are not available. Several tools have been developed to this end, but not enough research has been conducted yet to see to what extent they are scalable to other languages. \nIn the present work, we take two off-the- shelf tools designed for automatic speech rate computation and already tested for Dutch and English (v1, which relies on intensity peaks preceded by an intensity dip to find syllable nuclei and v3, which relies on intensity peaks surrounded by dips) and we apply them to read and spontaneous Spanish speech. Then, we test which of them offers the best performance. The results obtained with precision and normalized mean squared error metrics showed that v3 performs better than v1. However, recall measurement shows a better performance of v1, which suggests that a more fine-grained analysis on sensitivity and specificity is needed to select the best option depending on the application we are dealing with.","PeriodicalId":41541,"journal":{"name":"Loquens","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Loquens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2022.e090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic computation of speech rate is a necessary task in a wide range of applications that require this prosodic feature, in which a manual transcription and time alignments are not available. Several tools have been developed to this end, but not enough research has been conducted yet to see to what extent they are scalable to other languages. In the present work, we take two off-the- shelf tools designed for automatic speech rate computation and already tested for Dutch and English (v1, which relies on intensity peaks preceded by an intensity dip to find syllable nuclei and v3, which relies on intensity peaks surrounded by dips) and we apply them to read and spontaneous Spanish speech. Then, we test which of them offers the best performance. The results obtained with precision and normalized mean squared error metrics showed that v3 performs better than v1. However, recall measurement shows a better performance of v1, which suggests that a more fine-grained analysis on sensitivity and specificity is needed to select the best option depending on the application we are dealing with.
基于强度的语音速率自动计算方法的比较
在需要这种韵律特征的广泛应用中,语音速率的自动计算是一项必要的任务,在这些应用中,手动转录和时间比对是不可用的。为此已经开发了几种工具,但还没有进行足够的研究来了解它们在多大程度上可以扩展到其他语言。在目前的工作中,我们采用了两种现成的工具,它们是为自动语速计算而设计的,并且已经在荷兰语和英语中进行了测试(v1,它依赖于强度峰值之前的强度下降来找到音节核,v3,它依赖着强度峰值周围的下降),我们将它们应用于阅读和自发的西班牙语语音。然后,我们测试它们中哪一个提供了最好的性能。用精度和归一化均方误差度量获得的结果表明,v3的性能优于v1。然而,召回测量显示v1的性能更好,这表明需要对敏感性和特异性进行更精细的分析,以根据我们正在处理的应用程序选择最佳选项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Loquens
Loquens LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信