Urgent Need of Continuing Medical Education: The Key for Patient Awareness of Labor Epidural Analgesia – A Survey of Chinese Perinatal Care Providers

P. Zhao, Ling-Qun Hu, Chunyuan Liu, Huiling Li, Anna Huang, Shuwei Yang, Zhenyu Cai
{"title":"Urgent Need of Continuing Medical Education: The Key for Patient Awareness of Labor Epidural Analgesia – A Survey of Chinese Perinatal Care Providers","authors":"P. Zhao, Ling-Qun Hu, Chunyuan Liu, Huiling Li, Anna Huang, Shuwei Yang, Zhenyu Cai","doi":"10.1097/FM9.0000000000000094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This survey was designed to understand the misconceptions about labor epidurals. Methods: This voluntary and anonymous online survey on wenjuan.com was conducted from September 1st, 2015 to January 1st, 2016 via mainly WeChat groups dedicated to perinatal healthcare providers in China. The questionnaire included items inquiring the knowledge and opinions about labor epidural analgesia related to maternal complications, baby safety, and effect on laboring. Incomplete surveys were excluded from the data analysis. The data was presented as percentages and a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appreciate, was used to quantitatively compare the results. Results: A total of 1412 respondents completed surveys with 42.9% (606/1412) of them being anesthesiologists, 35.1% (495/1412) being obstetricians, 11.8% (167/1412) being midwives, 3.7% (52/1412) being labor and delivery nurses, and 6.5% (92/1412) being hospital administrators and unspecified. The study revealed a lack of knowledge in labor pain control. Although 82.4% (1164/1412) of respondents were familiar with labor epidural analgesia, 8.9% (126/1412) did not know how it works, and 1.1% (15/1412) never heard it in a multiple-choice question. The three main groups (anesthesiologists, obstetricians, and midwives/labor and delivery nurses) were chosen for comparisons. Opinions among these three groups concerning five questions in the three main concerns were evaluated using a statistical significance of P < 0.05. Conclusion: The results in our survey indicated an urgent need of continuing medical education to multidisciplinary specialties to improve evidence-based medical practices as these misconceptions have existed for over 10 years in the medical professionals. Lack of public awareness fueled by misconceptions related to labor epidural analgesia may be associated with a lack of professional knowledge. Correct knowledge in professionals needs to be disseminated to the public in order to dispel possible misconceptions and rumors about labor epidural analgesia. This would not only enhance patient understanding of their care but also improve maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":74121,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","volume":"3 1","pages":"169 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FM9.0000000000000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This survey was designed to understand the misconceptions about labor epidurals. Methods: This voluntary and anonymous online survey on wenjuan.com was conducted from September 1st, 2015 to January 1st, 2016 via mainly WeChat groups dedicated to perinatal healthcare providers in China. The questionnaire included items inquiring the knowledge and opinions about labor epidural analgesia related to maternal complications, baby safety, and effect on laboring. Incomplete surveys were excluded from the data analysis. The data was presented as percentages and a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appreciate, was used to quantitatively compare the results. Results: A total of 1412 respondents completed surveys with 42.9% (606/1412) of them being anesthesiologists, 35.1% (495/1412) being obstetricians, 11.8% (167/1412) being midwives, 3.7% (52/1412) being labor and delivery nurses, and 6.5% (92/1412) being hospital administrators and unspecified. The study revealed a lack of knowledge in labor pain control. Although 82.4% (1164/1412) of respondents were familiar with labor epidural analgesia, 8.9% (126/1412) did not know how it works, and 1.1% (15/1412) never heard it in a multiple-choice question. The three main groups (anesthesiologists, obstetricians, and midwives/labor and delivery nurses) were chosen for comparisons. Opinions among these three groups concerning five questions in the three main concerns were evaluated using a statistical significance of P < 0.05. Conclusion: The results in our survey indicated an urgent need of continuing medical education to multidisciplinary specialties to improve evidence-based medical practices as these misconceptions have existed for over 10 years in the medical professionals. Lack of public awareness fueled by misconceptions related to labor epidural analgesia may be associated with a lack of professional knowledge. Correct knowledge in professionals needs to be disseminated to the public in order to dispel possible misconceptions and rumors about labor epidural analgesia. This would not only enhance patient understanding of their care but also improve maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.
迫切需要继续医学教育:提高患者分娩硬膜外镇痛意识的关键——对中国围产期护理人员的调查
摘要目的:本调查旨在了解人们对硬膜外分娩的误解。方法:于2015年9月1日至2016年1月1日在问卷网进行自愿匿名在线调查,主要通过国内围产期医疗服务提供者的微信小组进行。问卷内容包括分娩时硬膜外镇痛的相关知识和意见、产妇并发症、婴儿安全及对分娩的影响。不完整的调查排除在数据分析之外。数据以百分比表示,并使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来定量比较结果。结果:共有1412名受访人员完成调查,其中麻醉医师占42.9%(606/1412),产科医师占35.1%(495/1412),助产士占11.8%(167/1412),分娩护理人员占3.7%(52/1412),医院管理人员及相关人员占6.5%(92/1412)。该研究揭示了分娩疼痛控制知识的缺乏。82.4%(1164/1412)的受访者熟悉分娩硬膜外镇痛,8.9%(126/1412)的受访者不知道其工作原理,1.1%(15/1412)的受访者在选择题中从未听说过硬膜外镇痛。选择三个主要组(麻醉师、产科医生和助产士/分娩护士)进行比较。三组对三个主要关注点中的五个问题的意见评价采用P < 0.05的统计学显著性。结论:调查结果表明,在医学专业人员中存在了10多年的这些误解,迫切需要对多学科专业进行继续医学教育,以改善循证医学实践。由于对分娩硬膜外镇痛的误解,公众意识的缺乏可能与缺乏专业知识有关。专业人员的正确知识需要传播给公众,以消除对分娩硬膜外镇痛可能存在的误解和谣言。这不仅可以提高患者对护理的了解,还可以改善产妇、胎儿和新生儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信