Indonesia’s Foreign and Maritime Policies Under Joko Widodo: Domestic and External Determinants
IF 0.8
Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen
{"title":"Indonesia’s Foreign and Maritime Policies Under Joko Widodo: Domestic and External Determinants","authors":"Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen","doi":"10.1177/23477970211039639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue aims to explain Indonesia’s maritime and foreign policies, under President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo, by looking at the intersection between domestic politics and systemic pressure. The extent to which domestic politics shape Indonesia’s foreign policy has always been an interesting topic. While numerous major scholarly works on Indonesia’s foreign policy have underlined this, most of them are empirically rich, but they lack an adequate theoretical framework (Agung; 1973; Anwar, 1994; Fionna et al., 2018; Hein, 1988; Kahin & Kahin, 1995; Leifer, 1983; Mackie, 1974; McMichael, 1987; Roberts et al., 2015; Shekhar, 2018; Smith, 2000; Sukma, 1999; Suryadinata, 1996; Weatherbee, 2016; Weinstein, 1976).1 This special issue uses neoclassical realism as a theoretical framework to explain how domestic politics interplay with external stimuli in the formulation of Indonesia’s foreign policy. Although structural realism continues to play a major role in explaining a state’s approach to its surrounding environment, there has emerged a growing literature, utilising concepts of neoclassical realism, placing greater emphasis on domestic politics as a complementary explanation. Neoclassical realism, along with variables of domestic politics, are explained at great lengths in the remainder of the articles in this special issue. Randall Schweller argues that the domesticlevel counterpart to structural realism is nationalism, particularly in an age of social media and mass politics (Schweller, 2018). According to him, nationalism had implications on the struggle among nations over issues of power, security and prestige that animate realism. Nationalism could result in the support of the policy of retrenchment or in increased assertiveness. Meanwhile, Steve Chan highlights Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 8(3) 287–303, 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/23477970211039639 journals.sagepub.com/home/aia","PeriodicalId":42502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970211039639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This special issue aims to explain Indonesia’s maritime and foreign policies, under President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo, by looking at the intersection between domestic politics and systemic pressure. The extent to which domestic politics shape Indonesia’s foreign policy has always been an interesting topic. While numerous major scholarly works on Indonesia’s foreign policy have underlined this, most of them are empirically rich, but they lack an adequate theoretical framework (Agung; 1973; Anwar, 1994; Fionna et al., 2018; Hein, 1988; Kahin & Kahin, 1995; Leifer, 1983; Mackie, 1974; McMichael, 1987; Roberts et al., 2015; Shekhar, 2018; Smith, 2000; Sukma, 1999; Suryadinata, 1996; Weatherbee, 2016; Weinstein, 1976).1 This special issue uses neoclassical realism as a theoretical framework to explain how domestic politics interplay with external stimuli in the formulation of Indonesia’s foreign policy. Although structural realism continues to play a major role in explaining a state’s approach to its surrounding environment, there has emerged a growing literature, utilising concepts of neoclassical realism, placing greater emphasis on domestic politics as a complementary explanation. Neoclassical realism, along with variables of domestic politics, are explained at great lengths in the remainder of the articles in this special issue. Randall Schweller argues that the domesticlevel counterpart to structural realism is nationalism, particularly in an age of social media and mass politics (Schweller, 2018). According to him, nationalism had implications on the struggle among nations over issues of power, security and prestige that animate realism. Nationalism could result in the support of the policy of retrenchment or in increased assertiveness. Meanwhile, Steve Chan highlights Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 8(3) 287–303, 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/23477970211039639 journals.sagepub.com/home/aia
佐科·维多多领导下的印尼外交和海洋政策:国内和外部决定因素
本期特刊旨在通过观察国内政治和系统性压力之间的交叉点,解释佐科·佐科维·维多多总统领导下的印尼海洋和外交政策。国内政治在多大程度上影响了印尼的外交政策一直是一个有趣的话题。尽管许多关于印尼外交政策的主要学术著作都强调了这一点,但其中大多数都是经验丰富的,但他们缺乏一个充分的理论框架(Agung;1973;安瓦尔,1994;Fiona等人,2018;Hein,1988;Kahin和Kahin,1995;Leifer,1983;Mackie,1974;McMichael,1987;Roberts等人,2015;Shekhar,2018;Smith,2000;Sukma,1999;Suryadinata,1996;Weatherbee,2016;Weinstein,1976)印度尼西亚外交政策制定过程中与外部刺激因素的相互作用。尽管结构现实主义在解释一个国家对周围环境的态度方面继续发挥着重要作用,但已经出现了越来越多的文献,利用新古典现实主义的概念,更加强调国内政治作为补充解释。新古典现实主义,以及国内政治的变量,在本期特刊的其余文章中都有详细的解释。Randall Schweller认为,与结构性现实主义相对应的国内层面是民族主义,尤其是在社交媒体和大众政治时代(Schweller,2018)。据他说,民族主义对各国在权力、安全和声望问题上的斗争产生了影响,这些问题激发了现实主义。民族主义可能导致对紧缩政策的支持或增强自信。与此同时,Steve Chan重点介绍了《亚洲安全与国际事务杂志》8(3)287–3032021©作者2021转载和许可:in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI:10.1177/2347970211039639 journals.sagepub.com/home/aia
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。