A PREOPERATIVE PLANNING METHOD FOR LONG TUBULAR BONE OSTEOSYNTHESIS

Q4 Medicine
G. P. Kotelnikov, A. Kolsanov, A. Pankratov, S. Ardatov, D. A. Ogurtsov, P. Zelter, A. Rubtsov
{"title":"A PREOPERATIVE PLANNING METHOD FOR LONG TUBULAR BONE OSTEOSYNTHESIS","authors":"G. P. Kotelnikov, A. Kolsanov, A. Pankratov, S. Ardatov, D. A. Ogurtsov, P. Zelter, A. Rubtsov","doi":"10.35693/2500-1388-2020-5-4-267-271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To compare the shape and size of human contralateral humerus bones based on the «Autoplan» program to justify the possibility of using healthy bone in a preoperative planning for bone osteosynthesis (on the example of the humerus). Methods. 20 patients underwent computed tomography of the chest, shoulder girdleand upper extremities. Two-dimensional medical imaging of separate layers were converted into three-dimensional models of the humerus bone STL format, which is used for 3D printing in all 3D printers. Preliminary registration to superimpose the mirrored left humerus bone on the right one was carried out for at least 4 key points; their matching in shape and size was analyzed. A comparison was made of the contralateral humerus bones of one patient according to computed tomograms of 20 people. The main anatomical landmarks of the humerus bones and the distance between adjacent points were selected for comparison when the bones were superimposed on each other. Superimposed humeral bones were compared using the Hausdorff distance calculation algorithm, which is used to measure the difference between scanned models and the ground-truth model separately. To visualize the result of calculating of Hausdorff distance, that is, the difference between the bones, color mapping of the latter was performed, where the proximity to red color means the difference tends to zero, the proximity to blue - to 1 cm (the maximal obtained difference). Results. The greatest difference was recorded in humeral heads - up to 6.8 mm, and in the epicondyle: the medial epicondyle - up to 4.5 mm, the lateral epicondyle - up to 4.4 mm. Color mapping allowed to see that the difference between the heads of the humerus increases from the center of the articular surface to the attachment points of the capsule. At the level of the diaphysis, from the anatomical neck to the condyles, the size differencesamong allbones in 20 patients was no more than 1.5 mm. Conclusion. Thereby, the comparison of the shape and size of the contralateral bones of the human humerus based on the «Autoplan» program will allow applying a three-dimensional model of healthy contralateral bone in the preoperative planning for bone osteosynthesis: thus reducing the surgical risks and injury for the patient. What this paper adds For the first time, the use of a 3-dimensional model for a preoperative planning method for long tubular bone osteosynthesis using the contralateral healthy bone for affected bone has been proposed. It has been found that in the preoperative period during osteosynthesis of the diaphysis of long tubular bones, it is possible to use a healthy contralateral bone for plate of the damaged bone (on the example of the humerus fracture). The identity of the shape and size of the humerus diaphyses with an accuracy of 1.5 mm has been proved, and the possibility of using a 3-dimensional model of a healthy bone for preoperative planning for long tubular bone osteosynthesis is justified.","PeriodicalId":38373,"journal":{"name":"Novosti Khirurgii","volume":"29 1","pages":"213-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosti Khirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35693/2500-1388-2020-5-4-267-271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To compare the shape and size of human contralateral humerus bones based on the «Autoplan» program to justify the possibility of using healthy bone in a preoperative planning for bone osteosynthesis (on the example of the humerus). Methods. 20 patients underwent computed tomography of the chest, shoulder girdleand upper extremities. Two-dimensional medical imaging of separate layers were converted into three-dimensional models of the humerus bone STL format, which is used for 3D printing in all 3D printers. Preliminary registration to superimpose the mirrored left humerus bone on the right one was carried out for at least 4 key points; their matching in shape and size was analyzed. A comparison was made of the contralateral humerus bones of one patient according to computed tomograms of 20 people. The main anatomical landmarks of the humerus bones and the distance between adjacent points were selected for comparison when the bones were superimposed on each other. Superimposed humeral bones were compared using the Hausdorff distance calculation algorithm, which is used to measure the difference between scanned models and the ground-truth model separately. To visualize the result of calculating of Hausdorff distance, that is, the difference between the bones, color mapping of the latter was performed, where the proximity to red color means the difference tends to zero, the proximity to blue - to 1 cm (the maximal obtained difference). Results. The greatest difference was recorded in humeral heads - up to 6.8 mm, and in the epicondyle: the medial epicondyle - up to 4.5 mm, the lateral epicondyle - up to 4.4 mm. Color mapping allowed to see that the difference between the heads of the humerus increases from the center of the articular surface to the attachment points of the capsule. At the level of the diaphysis, from the anatomical neck to the condyles, the size differencesamong allbones in 20 patients was no more than 1.5 mm. Conclusion. Thereby, the comparison of the shape and size of the contralateral bones of the human humerus based on the «Autoplan» program will allow applying a three-dimensional model of healthy contralateral bone in the preoperative planning for bone osteosynthesis: thus reducing the surgical risks and injury for the patient. What this paper adds For the first time, the use of a 3-dimensional model for a preoperative planning method for long tubular bone osteosynthesis using the contralateral healthy bone for affected bone has been proposed. It has been found that in the preoperative period during osteosynthesis of the diaphysis of long tubular bones, it is possible to use a healthy contralateral bone for plate of the damaged bone (on the example of the humerus fracture). The identity of the shape and size of the humerus diaphyses with an accuracy of 1.5 mm has been proved, and the possibility of using a 3-dimensional model of a healthy bone for preoperative planning for long tubular bone osteosynthesis is justified.
长管骨成骨术的术前规划方法
目标。比较基于«Autoplan»程序的人类对侧肱骨的形状和大小,以证明在骨成骨术前计划中使用健康骨骼的可能性(以肱骨为例)。方法:20例患者行胸部、肩带及上肢计算机断层扫描。将各层二维医学影像转换为肱骨STL格式的三维模型,在所有3D打印机中进行3D打印。至少对4个关键点进行初步配准,将镜像的左肱骨叠加在右肱骨上;分析了它们在形状和尺寸上的匹配。根据20人的计算机断层扫描图对1例患者的肱骨进行了比较。选取肱骨的主要解剖标志和相邻点之间的距离进行重叠时的比较。使用Hausdorff距离计算算法对叠加的肱骨进行比较,该算法用于分别测量扫描模型与ground-truth模型之间的差异。为了可视化计算Hausdorff距离的结果,即骨骼之间的差异,对后者进行颜色映射,其中接近红色表示差异趋于零,接近蓝色-接近1 cm(最大获得的差异)。结果。最大的差异记录在肱骨头-高达6.8毫米,在上髁:内侧上髁-高达4.5毫米,外侧上髁-高达4.4毫米。彩色映射可以看到肱骨头之间的差异从关节面中心到关节囊的附着点都在增加。在骨干水平,从解剖颈到髁突,20例患者所有骨的大小差异不超过1.5 mm。结论。因此,基于«Autoplan»程序的人体肱骨对侧骨骼的形状和大小的比较将允许在骨合成的术前计划中应用健康对侧骨骼的三维模型:从而降低手术风险和患者的伤害。本文首次提出了使用三维模型进行对侧健康骨置换受损骨的长管骨植骨术术前规划方法。研究发现,在长管骨骨干植骨术的术前阶段,可以使用健康的对侧骨作为受损骨的钢板(以肱骨骨折为例)。肱骨骨干的形状和大小的准确性可达1.5 mm,使用健康骨骼的三维模型进行长管骨成骨术前规划的可能性是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Novosti Khirurgii
Novosti Khirurgii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信