Sliders, visual analogue scales, or buttons: Influence of formats and scales in mobile and desktop surveys

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY
V. Toepoel, Frederik Funke
{"title":"Sliders, visual analogue scales, or buttons: Influence of formats and scales in mobile and desktop surveys","authors":"V. Toepoel, Frederik Funke","doi":"10.1080/08898480.2018.1439245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In an experiment dealing with the use of personal computer, tablet, or mobile, scale points (up to 5, 7, or 11) and response formats (bars or buttons) are varied to examine differences in mean scores and nonresponse. The total number of “not applicable” answers does not vary significantly. Personal computer has the lowest item nonresponse, followed by mobile and tablet, and a lower mean score than for mobile. Slider bars showed lower mean scores and more nonresponses than buttons, indicating that they are more prone to bias and difficult in use. Sider bars, which work with a drag-and-drop principle, perform worse than visual analogue scales working with a point-and-click principle and buttons. Five-point scales have more nonresponses than eleven-point scales. Respondents evaluate 11-point scales more positively than shorter scales.","PeriodicalId":49859,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Population Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08898480.2018.1439245","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Population Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2018.1439245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

ABSTRACT In an experiment dealing with the use of personal computer, tablet, or mobile, scale points (up to 5, 7, or 11) and response formats (bars or buttons) are varied to examine differences in mean scores and nonresponse. The total number of “not applicable” answers does not vary significantly. Personal computer has the lowest item nonresponse, followed by mobile and tablet, and a lower mean score than for mobile. Slider bars showed lower mean scores and more nonresponses than buttons, indicating that they are more prone to bias and difficult in use. Sider bars, which work with a drag-and-drop principle, perform worse than visual analogue scales working with a point-and-click principle and buttons. Five-point scales have more nonresponses than eleven-point scales. Respondents evaluate 11-point scales more positively than shorter scales.
滑块、视觉模拟刻度或按钮:移动和桌面调查中格式和刻度的影响
摘要在使用个人电脑、平板电脑或移动设备的实验中,量表点(最多5、7或11)和响应格式(条形或按钮)会发生变化,以检查平均得分和无响应的差异。“不适用”答案的总数变化不大。个人电脑的无反应项目最低,其次是手机和平板电脑,平均得分低于手机。滑块显示出比按钮更低的平均得分和更多的无反应,这表明它们更容易产生偏见,使用起来也更困难。使用拖放原理的边栏比使用点击原理和按钮的视觉模拟标尺表现更差。五分量表的无反应比十一分量表多。受访者对11分量表的评价比短量表更积极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mathematical Population Studies
Mathematical Population Studies 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical Population Studies publishes carefully selected research papers in the mathematical and statistical study of populations. The journal is strongly interdisciplinary and invites contributions by mathematicians, demographers, (bio)statisticians, sociologists, economists, biologists, epidemiologists, actuaries, geographers, and others who are interested in the mathematical formulation of population-related questions. The scope covers both theoretical and empirical work. Manuscripts should be sent to Manuscript central for review. The editor-in-chief has final say on the suitability for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信