Retention in statutory social work from fast-track child and family programs

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
J. Scourfield, J. Carpenter, N. Warner, Nina Maxwell, Laura Venn, Evgenia Stepanova, Chloé O’Donnell, Rebecca K Jones, Martin Elliott, Roger Smith
{"title":"Retention in statutory social work from fast-track child and family programs","authors":"J. Scourfield, J. Carpenter, N. Warner, Nina Maxwell, Laura Venn, Evgenia Stepanova, Chloé O’Donnell, Rebecca K Jones, Martin Elliott, Roger Smith","doi":"10.1177/14680173231194432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Two fast-track child and family social work training programs have been established in England — Step Up to Social Work and Frontline. Trainees’ financial support is far higher than for mainstream social work degrees. One of the reasons claimed for setting up these programs is addressing retention, although critics (of Frontline) predicted graduates would not stay in social work. A 4-year study assessed retention and reasons for leaving social work. Attrition rates from statutory social work were calculated from responses (n = 2543) to annual surveys, plus looking up non-respondents in the professional register. Interviews were conducted with fast-track graduates (n = 80) and employers (n = 29). Findings The overall rate of social work graduates not in statutory social work at 18 months post-qualification was 12% for fast-track programs, and Higher Education Statistics Agency survey data show attrition at 15 months post-qualification as 18% for all social work routes. Frontline's original national recruitment approach was less successful for retention than Step Up to Social Work's regional approach. Perceived local authority support and intrinsic job satisfaction were associated with attrition in longitudinal bivariate analysis. Fast-track graduates leaving statutory social work typically moved to work in social care (including policy roles), health, or education. Applications Early-career attrition appears to be somewhat lower from fast-track programs than from all social work graduates. Longer-term comparison is not yet possible. In promoting retention, employers should be aware of the importance of staff perceptions of the local authority as supportive, and of their intrinsic job satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":47142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231194432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Two fast-track child and family social work training programs have been established in England — Step Up to Social Work and Frontline. Trainees’ financial support is far higher than for mainstream social work degrees. One of the reasons claimed for setting up these programs is addressing retention, although critics (of Frontline) predicted graduates would not stay in social work. A 4-year study assessed retention and reasons for leaving social work. Attrition rates from statutory social work were calculated from responses (n = 2543) to annual surveys, plus looking up non-respondents in the professional register. Interviews were conducted with fast-track graduates (n = 80) and employers (n = 29). Findings The overall rate of social work graduates not in statutory social work at 18 months post-qualification was 12% for fast-track programs, and Higher Education Statistics Agency survey data show attrition at 15 months post-qualification as 18% for all social work routes. Frontline's original national recruitment approach was less successful for retention than Step Up to Social Work's regional approach. Perceived local authority support and intrinsic job satisfaction were associated with attrition in longitudinal bivariate analysis. Fast-track graduates leaving statutory social work typically moved to work in social care (including policy roles), health, or education. Applications Early-career attrition appears to be somewhat lower from fast-track programs than from all social work graduates. Longer-term comparison is not yet possible. In promoting retention, employers should be aware of the importance of staff perceptions of the local authority as supportive, and of their intrinsic job satisfaction.
保留快速通道儿童和家庭项目的法定社会工作
英国已经建立了两个快速通道的儿童和家庭社会工作培训项目——“社会工作入门”和“前线”。实习生的经济支持远远高于主流社会工作学位。尽管(前线)的批评者预测毕业生不会继续从事社会工作,但声称设立这些项目的原因之一是解决留用问题。一项为期4年的研究评估了保留率和离开社会工作的原因。法定社会工作的损耗率根据回答(n = 2543)进行年度调查,并在专业登记册中查找非受访者。对快速通道毕业生进行了访谈(n = 80)和雇主(n = 29)。对于快速通道项目,在获得资格后18个月未从事法定社会工作的社会工作毕业生的总体比例为12%,高等教育统计局的调查数据显示,在所有社会工作路线中,在获得资质后15个月的流失率为18%。Frontline最初的全国招聘方法在留住员工方面不如Step Up to Social Work的地区招聘方法成功。在纵向双变量分析中,感知到的地方当局支持和内在工作满意度与流失有关。离开法定社会工作的快速通道毕业生通常会转到社会护理(包括政策角色)、卫生或教育工作。快速通道项目的早期职业流失率似乎比所有社会工作毕业生的低。长期比较尚不可能。在促进留用方面,雇主应意识到员工对地方当局的支持以及他们内在的工作满意度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Social Work
Journal of Social Work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work is a forum for the publication, dissemination and debate of key ideas and research in social work. The journal aims to advance theoretical understanding, shape policy, and inform practice, and welcomes submissions from all areas of social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信