Old-Age Provision and Homeownership – Fiscal Incentives and Other Public Policy Options M. Eckardt, J. Dötsch, & S. Okruch (eds) Springer International Publishing, 2018

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Akshay Shanker
{"title":"Old-Age Provision and Homeownership – Fiscal Incentives and Other Public Policy Options M. Eckardt, J. Dötsch, & S. Okruch (eds) Springer International Publishing, 2018","authors":"Akshay Shanker","doi":"10.1017/S1474747221000135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to an ageing population, a larger and larger share of individuals in Europe and across the developed world will come to depend on retirement income, placing significant pressure on publicly funded pensions. As a result, discussion of retirement policy now includes not only public pensions, but private and occupational pensions and housing as forms of retirement saving and sources of retirement income. However, little is known about how public pensions (both publicly funded and contributory pensions), occupational and private pensions and housing interact. Retirement policy outcomes, in terms of income adequacy, equity and fiscal sustainability, will depend on the economic and behavioural relationships between these three potential sources of retirement income and the diverse policy and institutional contexts within countries. This book provides insight into the policy and institutional context across Europe by collecting eight papers, six of which are country case studies of Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (UK). The book is structured in four parts. Part I consists of two papers and overviews pensions and homeownership across Europe. Part II focuses on case-studies of countries with high homeownership and well-developed private and/or occupational pension markets (Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK), part III collects case-studies on countries with high-home ownership rates yet under-developed private and occupational pension systems (Hungary and Italy) and part IV gives a case study of Germany, with low home-ownership and an under-developed private and occupational pension system. Each case study details the historical trends and policy and institutional state of play regarding public pensions, occupational and private pensions and the housing and mortgage market. The first paper in part I by Eckardt summarizes data on household asset allocation, and it is striking to see the high levels of housing assets as a proportion of household wealth, with housing assets accounting for approximately 80% of household wealth across Europe. While housing as a share of household assets is consistent across Europe, there is diversity in the proportion of people owning a house, participation rates in mortgages and the age profile of homeownership, suggesting how differences in policies and social context may shape the distribution of housing and mortgaging behaviour. The high levels of housing assets in household balance sheets along with the dual role that housing can play – a form of shelter and a store of wealth for retirement – points to why housing is an important consideration for retirement policy making. However, Eckardt argues that little is known about the economic interaction between housing and pensions. In particular, whether housing substitutes or complements pension saving remains a question open to further research. In the second paper of part I, Megyeri analyses the relationship between old age poverty and oldage home-ownership in Europe. The paper shows the risk of old age poverty is higher amongst singleperson households, women and those above 75 years of age. While the risk of poverty amongst homeowners is lower, it is surprisingly only slightly lower (13% amongst homeowners compared to 13.8%","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"21 1","pages":"298 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1474747221000135","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747221000135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Due to an ageing population, a larger and larger share of individuals in Europe and across the developed world will come to depend on retirement income, placing significant pressure on publicly funded pensions. As a result, discussion of retirement policy now includes not only public pensions, but private and occupational pensions and housing as forms of retirement saving and sources of retirement income. However, little is known about how public pensions (both publicly funded and contributory pensions), occupational and private pensions and housing interact. Retirement policy outcomes, in terms of income adequacy, equity and fiscal sustainability, will depend on the economic and behavioural relationships between these three potential sources of retirement income and the diverse policy and institutional contexts within countries. This book provides insight into the policy and institutional context across Europe by collecting eight papers, six of which are country case studies of Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (UK). The book is structured in four parts. Part I consists of two papers and overviews pensions and homeownership across Europe. Part II focuses on case-studies of countries with high homeownership and well-developed private and/or occupational pension markets (Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK), part III collects case-studies on countries with high-home ownership rates yet under-developed private and occupational pension systems (Hungary and Italy) and part IV gives a case study of Germany, with low home-ownership and an under-developed private and occupational pension system. Each case study details the historical trends and policy and institutional state of play regarding public pensions, occupational and private pensions and the housing and mortgage market. The first paper in part I by Eckardt summarizes data on household asset allocation, and it is striking to see the high levels of housing assets as a proportion of household wealth, with housing assets accounting for approximately 80% of household wealth across Europe. While housing as a share of household assets is consistent across Europe, there is diversity in the proportion of people owning a house, participation rates in mortgages and the age profile of homeownership, suggesting how differences in policies and social context may shape the distribution of housing and mortgaging behaviour. The high levels of housing assets in household balance sheets along with the dual role that housing can play – a form of shelter and a store of wealth for retirement – points to why housing is an important consideration for retirement policy making. However, Eckardt argues that little is known about the economic interaction between housing and pensions. In particular, whether housing substitutes or complements pension saving remains a question open to further research. In the second paper of part I, Megyeri analyses the relationship between old age poverty and oldage home-ownership in Europe. The paper shows the risk of old age poverty is higher amongst singleperson households, women and those above 75 years of age. While the risk of poverty amongst homeowners is lower, it is surprisingly only slightly lower (13% amongst homeowners compared to 13.8%
杨建军,张建军,张建军,等(编):《养老保障与住房所有权——财政激励与其他公共政策选择》Dötsch
由于人口老龄化,欧洲和整个发达国家越来越多的人将依赖退休收入,这给公共资助的养老金带来了巨大压力。因此,现在对退休政策的讨论不仅包括公共养老金,还包括作为退休储蓄形式和退休收入来源的私人和职业养老金和住房。然而,人们对公共养老金(包括公共资助和缴费型养老金)、职业和私人养老金以及住房如何相互作用知之甚少。就收入充足性、公平性和财政可持续性而言,退休政策的结果将取决于这三个潜在的退休收入来源与各国不同的政策和体制背景之间的经济和行为关系。本书通过收集八篇论文,深入了解了整个欧洲的政策和制度背景,其中六篇是德国、匈牙利、爱尔兰、意大利、荷兰和英国的国家案例研究。这本书由四部分组成。第一部分由两篇论文组成,概述了整个欧洲的养老金和住房。第二部分侧重于住房拥有率高、私人和/或职业养老金市场发达的国家的案例研究(爱尔兰、荷兰和英国),第三部分收集住房拥有率较高但私人和职业养老金制度不发达的国家(匈牙利和意大利)的案例研究,住房拥有率低,私人和职业养老金制度发展不足。每个案例研究都详细介绍了公共养老金、职业和私人养老金以及住房和抵押贷款市场的历史趋势、政策和制度状况。Eckardt在第一部分的第一篇论文总结了家庭资产配置的数据,令人震惊的是,住房资产在家庭财富中所占比例很高,住房资产约占整个欧洲家庭财富的80%。虽然住房在整个欧洲的家庭资产中所占的份额是一致的,但拥有住房的人的比例、抵押贷款的参与率和拥有住房的年龄分布存在差异,这表明政策和社会背景的差异可能会影响住房的分配和抵押行为。家庭资产负债表中的高水平住房资产,以及住房可以发挥的双重作用——一种住房形式和退休财富的储存——表明了为什么住房是制定退休政策的重要考虑因素。然而,Eckardt认为,人们对住房和养老金之间的经济互动知之甚少。特别是,住房是替代还是补充养老金储蓄仍然是一个有待进一步研究的问题。在第一部分的第二篇论文中,Megyeri分析了欧洲老年贫困与老年住房所有权之间的关系。该论文表明,单身家庭、妇女和75岁以上的人中老年贫困的风险更高。虽然房主的贫困风险较低,但令人惊讶的是,贫困风险仅略低(房主为13%,而房主为13.8%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信