Risk factors of hemorrhage transformation after ischemic stroke and its prediction model

Liqun Yu, Sheng-liang Shi, Ye Zhang, Haifang Zhu
{"title":"Risk factors of hemorrhage transformation after ischemic stroke and its prediction model","authors":"Liqun Yu, Sheng-liang Shi, Ye Zhang, Haifang Zhu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-8799.2017.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo establish a prediction model by analyzing the related risk factors of hemorrhage transformation (HT) after ischemic stroke. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective study was performed on 327 cases of patients with ischemic stroke who were admitted from January 2015 to September 2016.The pathogenesis,clinical manifestation and general data of patients were retrospectively analyzed.The risk factors of HT were selected by logistic regression analysis and other methods,a new prediction model was established,and the evaluation boundary value of the ROC curve was obtained,which was greater than the evaluation boundary value was in HT high risk group. \n \n \nResults \nAtrial fibrillation ( OR=4.940,95%CI: 1.879~12.988,P<0.05 ),systolic blood pressure higher than 160 mmHg ( OR=2.762,95%CI: 1.175~6.494,P<0.05,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa ),massive cerebral infarction ( OR=3.796,95%CI: 1.495~9.635,P<0.05),NIHSS score more than 10 points ( OR=5.665,95%CI: 2.289~14.021,P<0.05),thrombolytic treatment ( OR=3.086,95%CI: 4.981~96.257,P<0.05) were independent risk factors for HT.Prediction model: Logit P=-3.588+ 1.579×X1+ 1.016×X2+ 1.334×X3+ 1.734×X4+ 3.086×X5.The AUC was 0.912 (95%CI: 0.873~0.950,P<0.001). When the boundary value was-2,the sensitivity was 88.33%,specificity is 82.02%. \n \n \nConclusion \nAtrial fibrillation history,systolic blood pressure which is higher than 160 mmHg,massive cerebral infarction,NIHSS score is more than 10 point,and thrombolytic treatment are independent risk factors for HT.The patient will have a higher risk of HT,when the boundary value is greater than-2. \n \n \nKey words: \nIschemic stroke; Hemorrhage transformation; Risk factor; Prediction model","PeriodicalId":64135,"journal":{"name":"中国临床实用医学","volume":"8 1","pages":"35-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国临床实用医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-8799.2017.04.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To establish a prediction model by analyzing the related risk factors of hemorrhage transformation (HT) after ischemic stroke. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 327 cases of patients with ischemic stroke who were admitted from January 2015 to September 2016.The pathogenesis,clinical manifestation and general data of patients were retrospectively analyzed.The risk factors of HT were selected by logistic regression analysis and other methods,a new prediction model was established,and the evaluation boundary value of the ROC curve was obtained,which was greater than the evaluation boundary value was in HT high risk group. Results Atrial fibrillation ( OR=4.940,95%CI: 1.879~12.988,P<0.05 ),systolic blood pressure higher than 160 mmHg ( OR=2.762,95%CI: 1.175~6.494,P<0.05,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa ),massive cerebral infarction ( OR=3.796,95%CI: 1.495~9.635,P<0.05),NIHSS score more than 10 points ( OR=5.665,95%CI: 2.289~14.021,P<0.05),thrombolytic treatment ( OR=3.086,95%CI: 4.981~96.257,P<0.05) were independent risk factors for HT.Prediction model: Logit P=-3.588+ 1.579×X1+ 1.016×X2+ 1.334×X3+ 1.734×X4+ 3.086×X5.The AUC was 0.912 (95%CI: 0.873~0.950,P<0.001). When the boundary value was-2,the sensitivity was 88.33%,specificity is 82.02%. Conclusion Atrial fibrillation history,systolic blood pressure which is higher than 160 mmHg,massive cerebral infarction,NIHSS score is more than 10 point,and thrombolytic treatment are independent risk factors for HT.The patient will have a higher risk of HT,when the boundary value is greater than-2. Key words: Ischemic stroke; Hemorrhage transformation; Risk factor; Prediction model
缺血性脑卒中后出血转化的危险因素及预测模型
目的通过分析缺血性脑卒中后出血转化(HT)的相关危险因素,建立预测模型。方法对2015年1月至2016年9月我院收治的327例缺血性脑卒中患者进行回顾性分析。回顾性分析患者的发病机制、临床表现及一般资料。通过logistic回归分析等方法选择HT的危险因素,建立新的预测模型,得到ROC曲线的评价边界值,HT高危组的评价边界值大于HT高危组的评价边界值。结果房颤(OR=4.940,95%CI: 1.879~12.988,P<0.05)、收缩压高于160 mmHg (OR=2.762,95%CI: 1.175~6.494,P<0.05,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、大面积脑梗死(OR=3.796,95%CI: 1.495~9.635,P<0.05)、NIHSS评分大于10分(OR=5.665,95%CI: 2.289~14.021,P<0.05)、溶栓治疗(OR=3.086,95%CI: 4.981~96.257,P<0.05)是HT的独立危险因素。预测模型:Logit P=-3.588+ 1.579×X1+ 1.016×X2+ 1.334×X3+ 1.734×X4+ 3.086×X5。AUC为0.912 (95%CI: 0.873~0.950,P<0.001)。当边界值为-2时,敏感性为88.33%,特异性为82.02%。结论房颤病史、收缩压高于160 mmHg、大面积脑梗死、NIHSS评分大于10分、溶栓治疗是HT的独立危险因素。当边界值大于2时,患者发生HT的风险较高。关键词:缺血性脑卒中;出血转化;风险因素;预测模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6167
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信